Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dro Hearing

Rate this question


Mr cue

Question

it just seem to me there are a lot of us vet on this site wait for transcipt. or a decision i believe these hearing are cost us time if u go informal does that mean its not tape and a decsion can be made or is just part of there game. and who does these transcipt are they all done one place. if so goto school to be court typer because the va will be looking for these lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 46
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

Carlie, I absolutely agree that having the official hearing adds time. I waited 2 months for them to just schedule my hearing only to get to Buffalo and find out that the hearing officer had to cancel for personnal reasons and nobody told me. Another 2 months waiting for a rescheduled hearing (I was told in person in Buffalo that I went to the back of the line after my hearing officer canceled, even though it wasn't my fault. They said that is just the way it is). Now I am 4 months post-hearing waiting for the transcripts plus the 3 months or so that it took VA to even accept my appeal and tell me I would be placed on the DRO list. So I am at 11 months with the DRO not having even opened up my file to look at it. Then I assume that she will either just do a blanket denial or will spend 2-3 months actually reading my file before sending me for a C&P, then another 2 months for a decision. So 15 months....... most of which could've been avoided if I didn't want transcripts.

Of course I could be wrong and I will get a leter today telling me that I am approved on all counts.

HAH!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Carlie, I absolutely agree that having the official hearing adds time.

....... most of which could've been avoided if I didn't want transcripts.

Quint - I do not feel that you getting a transcript of the Hearing adds time - because the Hearing has ALREADY been held. Getting your copy of the transcripts is a part of the Hearing Master's Responsibilities, unless you have a VSO (POA) then the transcripts are to be sent to them.

A Hearing is something that has to be scheduled which takes extra time -

getting a copy of the Hearing Transcript's does not have to be scheduled,

that's my point in this thread.

Hope this helps a vet.

carlie

Edited by carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

If a DRO Meeting is held and the rating is changed or improved did it add time or save time? I say it saved time and it also gave the Veteran another chance to present evidence and win their claim. Lets face it most of the time our claim sits in a dark place doing nothing.

DRO is sometimes called another bite at the apple. I say the time waster is the AMC

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant that having the official hearing adds time to the "total length" of he claim. I was told at my DRO (and in many IRIS's since then) that it takes 3 months to get the transcript of the meeting and that the claim is not worked until the transcripts come back. So there is 3 months minimum added to the entire claim total. My DRO specifically encouraged me NOT to make my hearing official (on tape) so that it would be worked immediately instead of waiting (4 months so far) for the transcripts.

As I've said before, I have read on here about members walking out of the hearing with an agreement that A, B and C were accepted or denied, etc. My hearing was nothing like that at all. My DRO had not reviewed my claim issues or even opened my file before the meeting. She only had my list of items appealed and anytime I mentioned something not on that list she stopped me and told me to file a new claim about that issue (even thought it applied to the appeal).

MY hearing has definately added time to my appeal, but I agree that it will be worth it as the DRO is supposed to review every page of my C-File (at least thats what I have read on here).

My point is don't expect to walk out of the hearing with an agreement with the VA and expect a check to come anytime soon, official hearing or not. Some of us have been lucky and had a good DRO hearing. Others like me.... well as I said before....... I'm sitting here waiting.

Edited by Quint7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I meant that having the official hearing adds time to the "total length" of he claim.

My point is don't expect to walk out of the hearing with an agreement with the VA and expect a check to come anytime soon, official hearing or not. Some of us have been lucky and had a good DRO hearing. Others like me.... well as I said before....... I'm sitting here waiting.

Yes, for sure requesting a DRO Hearing does add time.

The claimant or VSO (POA) should get a copy of the transcript's about

the same time as the decision maker get's their copy of the transcript's.

Quint, FYI - my DRO Hearing was like yours. MY VSO totally sucked

and the DRO's Rating Decision was a rubber stamped denial of the prior Rating Decisions.

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

slphelan,

The DRO at my Hearing at Bay Pines VARO

would NOT allow me to use my own personal

cassett recorder at the Hearing.

carlie

I had a hearing a while back and the transcript was absolutely not accurate to what was said at the hearing by the hearing officer. It was, in fact, "sanitized" of anything that might be construed as adverse to my claim. ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use