Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Issues Not Addressed At C&p

Rate this question


dougm

Question

Hey all,

I had a C&P today, which addressed the following issues: bilateral flat feet, left wrist pain, left shoulder pain, lower back pain.

The examiner was not asked to address the following items: upper back pain, bipolar disorder, insomnia disorder, hemorrhoids, rhinitis, and chronic bronchitis.

Most of these other issues are well documented (with recent notes from VA treatment) with the exception of the upper back pain. The rhinitis and bronchitis were addressed by a pulmonary specialist, and bipolar/insomnia have been extensively addressed at mental health.

Here is the question. Should I be concerned that these items were not included at the C&P exam, and that I do not have a scheduled mental health C&P? Additionally, does this mean they have already decided against service connecting these items?

Thanks in advance.

Doug

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you claimed the other conditions then you will probably be set up for a C&P. Did you get a VCAA letter on those other conditions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you claimed the other conditions then you will probably be set up for a C&P. Did you get a VCAA letter on those other conditions?

I did claim the other issues at the same time, and responded to all issues in the VCAA letter at the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Doug

If it were me I would ask what was up. If you have a Service Officer they should be able to get someone to Review Officer to talk about it

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Doug,

What the following statement tells me is that you were diagnosed with these conditions.

Most of these other issues are well documented (with recent notes from VA treatment) with the exception of the upper back pain. The rhinitis and bronchitis were addressed by a pulmonary specialist, and bipolar/insomnia have been extensively addressed at mental health.

The VCAA requires that if you file a claim for a condition that has been diagnosed post service a C&P should be scheduled. If they do not provide a C&P they are supposed to provide you with a clear explanation as to why the exams were not scheduled. This would be explained in the decision. The VCAA letters that I have seen do not explain as much as they should. Sometimes the decisions do not explain as much as they should.

This is what I have told veterans many times over the years. If you have the ear of a doctor and he sounds interested in helping; try and get the doctor to write nexus statements and any other letter in support of your claim. The C&P process is not something to depend on. Many veterans on this cite have won claims with IMO’s after the claim was originally denied on the opinion of the C&P exams. Several I know of won without ever having a C&P because a VA doctor or private doctor got involved and wrote good statements that were submitted with the claim.

When my claim was denied my SO had no idea what was going through the heads of the raters until we got the decision. My SO was a rater for twenty years and thought the claim was a slam dunk. Do not be surprised that answers are hard to come by. Keep pushing them for the information you seek. Keep up your appeals and get a good Service officer. I battled them for 8.5 years to win a claim that was as my SO thought a slam dunk winner.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use