Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bob Mcnamara Dies

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Bob McNamara Dies

The infamous Bob McNamara Secretary of Defense during the Kennedy and Johnson Administrations has died at 93.

While many in our Vietnam groups will not comment on the passing of such a vile contemptible politician I will offer up my opinions.

The Vietnam War is sometimes referred to as “McNamara’s Warâ€. However, I think he just told Johnson what he wanted to hear and more than likely or so it seems Johnson himself wanted that war; for whatever his reasons. I believe Kennedy had already decided to pull out with troops being sent home when he was killed. Johnson then reversed that policy with McNamara while complicit simply a political pawn as so many of our Secretaries of Defense have become as well as the head military men from the Joint Chiefs have also fallen into that category of telling the nation what the President wants to be told not the facts. In other words there is no disagreement of policy only the lock step of politics and misleading statements. One only has to look at any of the JCS’s that actually stood up recently and how they were put out to pasture. Of course none bothered to during the Vietnam Era and once again just stood in lock step with the lies and deceit.

But as you already know the government cat on military men and women was let out of the bag in 1979 I think it was with another infamous appointed government cabinet member in Secretary Kissinger stating, “Military men are dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns for foreign policy.†(Reporters Woodward and Bernstein 1979)

Evidence continues today of such when the Homeland Security Secretary suggested they keep on eye on returning Veterans as politically enemies and such.

So there is no doubt there is government disdain for the military throughout our recent history at least as far back as the 1960’s.

While I will not comment on what my hopes for Mr. McNamara’s death have been; I can tell you the following:

Mr. McNamara and his wiz kids were responsible for the M16 fiasco actually forcing the DOD to go to the untried and untested M16. Mr. McNamara and his computer wiz kids taking such irresponsible action as to cancel the production of the M14 so it would force the hands of the DOD and taking the decision once again out of the military. We do not know how many lives in combat personnel it caused. But I would conclude those men are directly responsible with their political policies. No one held accountable. And I can give many examples of such brave men that lost their lives due to a so called combat assault rifle becoming nothing but a club.

In 1967 more than 5,000 scientists a number of them Nobel laureates delivered a petition asking Johnson/McNamara to end Agent Orange usage in Vietnam.

In 1968 The American Association for the Advancement of Science petitioned McNamara to study the short and long term consequence of using Agent Orange. Some scientists urged the Administration to adhere to the international ban on chemical warfare.

As we all know none of this happened, politics with Johnson/McNamara prevailed and the description of the American Military man by Kissinger took its place in history.

In World War Two the casualties were just over 400,000. There is no doubt in my mind these two men are responsible for at least that many Vietnam Veterans early deaths; if not more. Warriors chemically wounded on the field of battle while our government continues to deny the events as they rewrite not only history but medical history. As one very sick member of our group contended you only have to mention Agent Orange in Congress and it is like turning on the light in a cockroach invested house as they all run to hide under rocks and any cover the politician can find.

Not only was McNamara unconcerned, even though warned, on Agent Orange and the other toxic herbicides with his son safe at home in college protesting the war; he then as Secretary of Defense approved the actual biological chemical warfare (BCW) testing of our own military men and women in such programs as Project 112 and SHAD. The results in death and disability and what was created the DOD is still protecting while Congress sits by and does little for those Veterans.

Project 112 and SHAD are some other words in Congress that create the run for cover when the lights are turned on.

In addition, McNamara’s lack of concern for State Department Pawns for what many scientists at the time concluded as chemical warfare not only killed or disabled 100’s of thousands of our Veterans but the generational effects of the totally innocent are now coming home to roost.

Former Secretary of Defense Robert (Bob) McNamara during the Vietnam War dead at the age of 93.

He received a better death than he earned.

Kelley

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Blindly following our leaders always seems get us killed. Henry Kissinger is a horses buttocks. His car broke down once in the country and a farmer came up to help him and he told the farmer proudly that he was Dr. Kissinger. The farmer said "well that's great, you must be new at the animal clinic."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Kissinger was equally as bad as McNamara. I hope he, Mcnamara, LBJ and Nixon are all burning in hell together for what they did to US military and the millions of people in S.E. Asia. They do fit the definition of war criminal. They all lied to either get us into the Vietnam war, or to get us out of it with "honor". If that is honor I would hate to see dishonor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use