Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Dioxin's Dangers Known Beforehand

Rate this question


allan

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Partial reprint of attached article in PDF format

Mum's the word

A declassified letter by V.K. Rowe

at Dow's Biochemical Research

Library to Bioproducts Manager Ross

Milholland dated June 24, 1965

clearly states that the company knew

the dioxin in their products,

including Agent Orange, could hurt

people.

In reference to 2,4,5,-trichlorophenol

and 2,3,7,8,-tetrachlorodibenzodioxin

(components of Agent Orange), Rowe

stated:

"This material is exceptionally toxic;

it has a tremendous potential for

producing chloracne and systemic

injury."

Rowe worried the company would

suffer if word got out.

"The whole 2,4,5-T industry would

be hard hit and I would expect

restrictive legislation, either barring

the material or putting very rigid

controls upon it."

********

The report quotes a 1988 letter from

Dr. James R. Clary, a former

government scientist with the

Chemical Weapons Branch, to Senator

Tom Daschle. Dr. Clary was involved

in designing tanks that sprayed

herbicides and defoliants in Vietnam,

according to the report.

Clary told Daschle:

"When we (military scientists)

initiated the herbicide program in the

1960's, we were aware of the potential

for damage due to dioxin

contamination in the herbicide. We

were even aware that the 'military'

formulation had a higher dioxin

concentration than the 'civilian' version

due to the lower cost and speed of

manufacture. However, because the

material was to be used on the 'enemy,'

none of us were overly concerned. We

never considered a scenario in which

our own personnel would become

contaminated with the herbicide. And,

if we had, we would have expected our

own government to give assistance to

veterans so contaminated."

Chemical warfare: calling a spade a

spade

Supporters of the US's Agent Orange

Campaign prefer to call it an

"herbicide program" rather than

chemical warfare. But official

documents reveal that the US Senate

knew its real name.

In US Senate Congressional Records

dated August 11, 1969, a table

presented to senators showed that

congress clearly classified 2,4-D and

2,4,5-T (main components of Agent

Orange) in the Chemical and Biological

Warfare category.

The table also includes Cacodylic

Acid, a main component of Agent Blue,

another chemical sprayed on Vietnam

to kill plants, in the official Chemical

and Biological Warfare category. The

table describes it as "an arsenic-base

compound.heavy concentrations will

cause arsenical poisoning in humans.

Widely used in Vietnam. It is

composed of 54.29 percent arsenic."

As Vietnam War Scholar and US

Veteran W.D. Ehrhart put it concisely

in a Thanh Nien Daily interview last

week: "It would be hard to describe

Agent Orange as anything other than

a chemical weapon. Dioxin is a

chemical." So is arsenic.

-----Original Message-----

From: Ney, Gerald A CIV [mailto:gerald.ney@navy.mil]

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 2:11 PM

To: ColonelDan

Subject: FW: Dioxin's Dangers Known Beforehand

-----Original Message-----

From: Wayne Dwernychuk [mailto:wdwernychuk@telus.net]

Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 15:02

Subject: Dioxin's Dangers Known Beforehand

You should find this of interest.

Wayne

__._,_.___Attachment(s) from Colonel Dan

1 of 1 File(s)

pdf16x16.gifDioxin's_Dangers_Known_THANHNIEN_p3.pdf "Keep on, Keepin' on"

Dan Cedusky, Champaign IL "Colonel Dan"

See my web site at:

http://www.angelfire.com/il2/VeteranIssues/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 3
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

3 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Every time I see one of those jive DOW advertisements on TV about how they are saving the world I wish an astroid would hit them. I think those in DOW and those who knew about the effects are war criminals because they sprayed that stuff on civilians. AO was sprayed on people we were supposed to be saving from communism. "We are here from the USA and we are going to kill you "

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use