Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ptsd And Incompetency

Rate this question


Guest jco

Question

I'm 100% SC for PTSD & psychosis since 2004. I had another C&P a couple of weeks ago and am awaiting the outcome, however, I read the VA doctor's write-up. He's recommending me for hospitalization, says I'm not competent to handle my VA affairs, that I'm not employable, and that the impact is total.

I know this is what many people would want to hear, and I recognize this may help me get P&T which is what my SO recommended I put in for. However, I'm wondering about the impacts of being declared "incompetent." Has anyone faced this, and what were the impacts? Should I fight this or just let it ride and blow it off. My wife would (hopefully) be assigned as my competent agent.

Thanks for the new web site and the feedback,

Jeff

Persian Gulf 1991 and Pentagon 9-11-2001

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 12
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

All I can remember is a guy who used to post from Illinois who was sorely abused by the fiduciary that the VA appointed. If you are determined to need help please make sure it is someone like your wife or someone who can be trusted.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Responding to Susans comments and questions:

The physician made the remarks in his conclusions saying, ""Psychosis and PTSD are intertwined. One would tend to exacerbate the other. Occupational and social impairment are both estimated as total. He appears to unemployed and unemployable. LIkelihood of him re turning to the workplace appears nil. Consideration should be given to hospitalization. WIth regards to competency, this examiner agrees with last examiner in Jan 2004, in that the patient is clearly incompetent to manage his affairs for VA purposes." I couldn't remember how much money was put into my account when asked during the examination. Perhaps that is why he ruled me incompetent for VA purposes.

We have good credit, little debt and live carefully. My wife is a good help to me and when able, I try to be the same to her. I will submit my credit score if it comes back as incompetent.

I have not applied for A&A or SSDI. I think I receive enough from the VA. I prefer to be considered competent, so I will try to show our financial status as satisfactory.

Thanks for all your inputs.

Cheers

Jeff

Persian Gulf 1991 Pentagon 9-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSA called my deceased husband in 1992 and said they were declaring him incompetent for SSA benefits purposes due to PTSD and he could appeal it but he told her no he liked it as this stroke (from AO DM) made him unable to see change and denominations on bills and his PN caused him inability to write a check. He told the SSA woman -gee I have PTSD and now I am incompetent and also the VA said I have significant brain damage so now I know what to tell the Student loan people when they hassle me about the loan.(they called here day after day)

VA however had said he was competent.

(actually soon after that he got his student loan written off due to permanent and total disability-we found a law that showed -if he had made one single payment after his disabled date, he could not have gotten the write off. )

A vet I helped get 100% was declared incompetent. His retro was well over 100 thousand clams and he would have spent it in day.

But it took many long months for them to interview and send his wife the money and here after waiting for years at NSC,for SC , he ended up waiting and waiting again.

It can be a two edged sword- Congrats -you did VERY well on your claim!

Edited by Berta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

SSA called my deceased husband in 1992 and said they were declaring him incompetent for SSA benefits purposes due to PTSD and he could appeal it but he told her no he liked it as this stroke (from AO DM) made him unable to see change and denominations on bills and his PN caused him inability to write a check. He told the SSA woman -gee I have PTSD and now I am incompetent and also the VA said I have significant brain damage so now I know what to tell the Student loan people when they hassle me about the loan.(they called here day after day)

VA however had said he was competent.

(actually soon after that  he got his student loan written off due to permanent and total disability-we found a law that showed -if he had made one single payment after his disabled date, he could not have gotten the write off. )

A vet I helped get 100% was declared incompetent. His retro was well over 100 thousand clams and he would have spent it in day.

But it took many long months for them to interview and send his wife the money and here after waiting for years at NSC,for SC , he ended up waiting and waiting again.

It can be a two edged sword- Congrats -you did VERY well on your claim!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

Berta,

Well, there's a big difference between brain disorders (like what your husband encountered due to stroke) and declaring someone incompetent because they have a severe psychiatric disorder. A lot of people in this country, and the VA, believe you must have some level of retardation if you have a psychiatric disability....this, obviously, isn't the case at all and if someone has the where-with-all to find and post to this forum then they can easily spend 20 minutes a month paying some bills when they are having "good" days.

I have also noticed that the VA expects a veteran with severe PTSD to be severely disabled ALL of the time. Even though the regs make it clear that psychiatric disorders have "highs and lows", if a rater gets wind that a veteran was able to do something somewhat "normal" you can bet a low-ball rating is not far behind.

I have done extensive research on this topic and I can assure you that there is NO connection between psychiatric disorders and spending problems. I came across a few studies that suggested that even people with disorders synonymous with spending sprees (like bipolar) do not over-spend simply because of the disorder.. the studies suggested a genetic predisposition towards spending problems and the disability just caused it to worsen some.

The VA abuses this program regularly and uses it as a means to spy on vets with PTSD and to give impromptu inspections to ensure that they are as disabled as they say they are....why else would the fiduciary have a policy of making surprise visits on vets that are terrified of change and "surprise" visitors? They "claim" it is to make sure the vet isn't being abused, but their role is not to ensure the safety of vets..they are there to make sure the vets bills are getting paid and their money is being used to support the veteran. This can easily be established by credit reports, bill summaries from creditors, bank statements, etc...whether or not a veteran's house is clean has nothing to do with it.

Personally, I take great offense to this program because there is SO much potential for abuse to veterans. It is, by far, the worst program the VA runs and the SO's can't praise it enough:-(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta and Jay,

Thank you both for your inputs. When the decision comes through, and I expect they will propose incompetency, I have already pulled a credit report and a credit score, which are both excellent. I will send them those documents and a request not to be declared incompetent. The last thing I need is strange people coming to my house at unscheduled times. I can barely get through a C&P trying to tell a strange doctor things it took me two years to tell my therapist in monthly one-on-one's.

I'll let you know how things come out. THis all came about after I applied for P&T. We'll see, but I appreciate both of your comments and insights.

God bless

Jeff

Persian Gulf Vet 1990-1991 Pentagon 9-11

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jeff- I sure recommend that you consider applying for SSA and any award letter from the VA will help on that.

I need to clarify- Rod was still competent in VA and SSA eyes after suffered numerous tias and then a totally disabling stroke. (1992)

The SSA regs state that they will consider ALL disabilties so I called them and asked how they had considered his then 30% PTSD in the initial SSA award for stroke.

They didnt consider PTSD at all. They said they awarded for the stroke so they didnt have to consider it.So I said we want to file for a Reconsideration- SSA tryied to talk me out of it and I got a laywer. He tried to talk me and Rod out of it ans he said it would never work-

I figured get SSA for PTSD and then the VA would stop farting around with Rod's PTSD upgrade claim.

Long story- we filed it without lawyer.

3 months later SSA called here-SSA for PTSD granted-on the reconsideration with an additional year retro.and that is when the incompetency was determined- I stated this wrong above-

it was for the PTSD.

After they talked to Rod about that I got on phone and called the lawyer . He remembered us and I said you just missed out on over 4,000 bucks.

(they used to get 25 %) My husband's retro due to PTSD on Reconsideration appeal from SSA was over $17,000.

We sent the award letter to VA and the DAV.

I called the DAV to ask if it would help. The NSO said well maybe but I dont think so.I said did you ever hear of Washington V Derwonski (COVA)? well of course he never did.

That was early 1993.

The VA awarded 100% P & T for PTSD to Rod retro to 1991 in 1997-6 years later. Lots of good it did him-he had been dead for three years due to AO DMII from Nam. And dead also due to Sec 1151- (they awarded his March 1994 Sec 1151 claim 4 years after his death)

sorry i did not clarify.

OH PS- the SSA - they based their PTSD decision solely on VA records.

He never even saw a SSA doc-they had all the records they needed in the med rec file from VA.

They even had more on his service in 2 branches than the VA did.And lots of shrink stuff not in his c file in Buffalo.

Edited by Berta
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use