Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Court Order To Expedite A Claim?

Rate this question


Hoppy

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Pete, and others,

This subject came up under another thread. However, I started a new topic to deal with this. I am interested in the possibility of a court order or congressional order to expedite a claim. Is this a real possibility???

I have been researching a problem that involves RO's routinely disregarding adjudication procedures that were defined by a federal circuit court review of existing law. The result of the RO's disregard of this procedure is that the RO fails to schedule a C&P exam that would have been scheduled if the RO properly applied the federal circuit courts defined procedures. As a result the claims are routinely denied without the benefit of a C&P. Not only did the RO ignore the federal court in the case I am working on it appears that the BVA is remanding way to many of these determinations. I am of the opinion that this ongoing failure needs to be investigated as a willful disregard for the procedures defined by the court.

This involves an erronous preadjudication determination that a new claim is an attempt to open a previously denied and closed claim. Even tough the veteran submitted a letter explaining this was a new claim the RO adjudicated the claim under the laws applicable to a previously closed claim. The veteran was not provided any explanation of how this determination was made. There was no reference to applicable laws. The veteran recieved a letter explaining that because his claim was previously closed the VA would not schedule any exams.

The veteran is put in a position to obtain an opinion outside the C&P process. I have received price quotes of up to $4,000.00 for a C&P for the claim I am working on.

I have some connections and was able to get the attention of a VA C&P examiner who works at a local VA hospital. The examiner I found has taken an interest in the claim and has written a very good opinion in favor of service connection. What is really good is that in the first paragraph the examiner provides a complete history of their qualifications including the fact that they have performed C&P exams for over ten years.

I am upset that the case was denied based on a report we got from a primary care doctor. Now that we have the new report I want the claim re-adjudicated on the same time line that it would have been adjudicated had the RO obtained the C&P. I am not interested in going through the appeal process because the RO decided to ignore the instructions of a federal court. The claim was not properly processed. I am thinking of contacting the federal court and the congress and advising them that the RO's are ignoring the procedure defined by the federal court.

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

All I can say is "Writ of Mandamus"

On second thought ask for a Hearing at RO. That is the way I got 100% and my claim was sitting at the BVA when I did it. Everyone told me I was a fool. The dumb RO thought that my claim had been remanded. This is personal experience not an opinion

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Yes, I think a personal hearing might get it moving. You at least get the chance to explain your position to a human being. I think getting things fixed at the lowest possible level is best inside the Beast (VA). Congress and the courts have no idea what is going on inside the VA. Since none of them are disabled vets they probably can't conceive of how screwed up things are at the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use