Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Alj Denied

Rate this question


giz

Question

those that think that va total and permanant gives you a lock for ssd it dont and the reason for denial was completly made up he just ignored the facts and on the va he just said that he is not bound by the va decision,no kidding thats the best you could come up with.i know i can appeal but it is so frustrating when a judge just ignores three doctors saying i cant work and his own jobs guy saying theirs know job i can do,thanks for letting me vent :) ill keep fighting till i die

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 32
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

This isn’t actually something you brought up, but the first rule of order should be taking care of YOU. So before we get too involved in what to do next about Social Security – do you have the means to take care of yourself financially at the moment? Pay bills? Keep warm? Buy food? Stay safe? Get medical care? Etc.

As I have mentioned – though you have every right to appeal the decision to the AC (Appeals Council) we are talking a year in the very least – most likely much longer. So you need a plan of how you are going to take care of yourself in the meantime.

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am interested to know, did your lawyer provide the judge with a brief, before or during the hearing? If he did, you should have received a copy of it.

The brief would highlight the evidence the attorney wants the Judge to look at, and argue why that shows you are disabled. Most Judges only spend a few hours on each case – so having an attorney highlight the important parts is very beneficial.

This is not to excuse a Judge ignoring evidence. But many Judges might not dig deep for evidence, especially if you are represented by an attorney.

Regardless of whether the lawyer pointed it out though, if the evidence was in the file, and the Judge indicated there was no such evidence – it sounds like grounds for an appeal.

I did post info on the AC review. It is not a review where they ‘re-try,” so to speak, the case. They will be looking for those things in the previous posts – Did the Judge abuse his discretion? Did the Judge misapply the law? Were the Judge’s findings based on substantive evidence? (sounds like this might be where the appeal will focus..).

Are you able to talk to your attorney about the decision? If so, what did they say?

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thanks free and everyone for the help i dont post much, but im always reading everybodys journey thru the madness,thanks again :)

Welcome to the journey through the madness. And hang on tight - it's a hell of ride!

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Something else you might want to consider discussing with an attorney is filing a new claim. You are entitled to file a new claim while your Request for Review is pending. If the new claim is granted - the onset date would be the day after the ALJ Hearing (or whatever point they decide you meet the criteria, if later than the Hearing).So you would still have the 5 month waiting period for benefits. (This date can later be changed if the AC grants review on your initial claim).

I am not sure how well your claim was developed on your initial application - but you most likely could have it better developed now. You have letters from doctors saying you can't work. Submit them. It would be hard for them to say the Judge has already considered them, if the ALJ decision says they didn't exist.

Not sure what you best move is. But you can find more info on submitting a new claim while your appeal is pending at: http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/hallex/I-05/I-5-3-17.html

And it would be best to discuss the matter with an attorney - because there are drawbacks and benefits either way. And it might be best to wait awhile - because you will have more evidence and new info then, and they can always go back up to 12 months (up to the date of the ALJ decision)if they grant it - so you won't actually lose any benefits by waiting, but you might not help your case by re-applying too soon.

(Maybe you will have a new ulcer by that time from your journey through madness:) )

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use