Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

For Survivors Of Veterans Who Died After Opct 10,2008

Rate this question


Berta

Question

We discussed this here before when 5121 was changed but it bears repeating- in late 2008 the VA recognized that the 38 USC 5121 regs should be amended to allow a surviving spouse to substitute his or herself for any deceased veteran who had a claim pending at time of their death and amended 38 USC 5121 to reflect this aspect of the Veterans Benefits Improvement Act of 2009:

The standard mantra to widows for decades was "The claim died with the veteran"- and NSOs and vet reps would often not even tell the survivor that they themselves could resurrect the claim by re-opening the claim in their name.

This is the new substitution amendment :

Section 212. SUBSTITUTION UPON DEATH OF CLAIMANT.

This section creates a new statute: 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, Substitution in case of death of claimant. It provides that if a claimant dies while a claim or appeal for any benefit under a law administered by the Secretary is pending, a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title may, not later than one year after the date of the death of the claimant, request to be substituted as the claimant for the purposes of processing the claim to completion.

The new statute allows a person who could be considered an accrued benefits claimant to substitute for a deceased claimant to continue adjudication of the deceased claimant’s claim.

Effective Date- The provisions of the new statute apply with respect to the claim of any claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008.

VBA Action: Regulations will be revised to include the new provision. Pending regulatory change, for requests to be substituted for a deceased claimant:

  • A written claim for substitution must be filed within one year of the date of death of the claimant whose claim is at issue.
  • The claimant who requests to be substituted must be someone who would be eligible under 38 CFR 3.1000, Entitlement under 38 U.S.C. § 5121 to benefits due and unpaid upon death of a beneficiary.
  • Continue adjudication of the claim as if the original claimant was not deceased.
  • If evidence required to substantiate the claim cannot be obtained due to the original claimant’s death, the claim shall be rated based on the evidence of record. If an examination is required, consider 38 CFR § 3.655, Failure to report for Department of Veterans Affairs examination.
  • The date of claim for the request for substitution will be the date the written request for substitution is received in VA.
  • Any representation by a service organization, attorney or agent prior to death does not transfer to the substituted representative. If the individual desires representation he/she must execute a new power of attorney. When a request for substitution is received the new claimant should be advised of this fact.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per NVLSP this change would make the idea of "accrued" benefits obselete-still payable but not technically accrued and the survivor, as substituted claimant would have the opportunity to submit any new evidence they could to support the veteran's claim which -in the past- was evidence that was limited only to that which was in the veteran;'s C file at time of death.(38 USC 5121 and 38 CFR 3.100.)

A formal request for substitution of a deceased claimant has the same time limits as any accrued claim. The request must be made within one year of the veteran';s death to the regional office with jurisdiction over the pending claim at time of the veteran's death.

All retroactive awards under this new amendment also come under the Bonny V Principi auspices- meaning accrued retro is not limited any more to 2 years accrued and the survivor will receive ALL accrued due the veteran less any comp paid in their lifetime.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

So under the new regs the survivor can continue to develop the record for accrued benefits, and not be limited to what was in the record at the time of the veteran's death? (applicable for death after October 2008)

Think Outside the Box!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We discussed this here before when 5121 was changed but it bears repeating- in late 2008 the VA recognized that the 38 USC 5121 regs should be amended to allow a surviving spouse to substitute his or herself for any deceased veteran who had a claim pending at time of their death and amended 38 USC 5121 to reflect this aspect of the Veterans Benefits Improvement Act of 2009:

The standard mantra to widows for decades was "The claim died with the veteran"- and NSOs and vet reps would often not even tell the survivor that they themselves could resurrect the claim by re-opening the claim in their name.

This is the new substitution amendment :

Section 212. SUBSTITUTION UPON DEATH OF CLAIMANT.

This section creates a new statute: 38 U.S.C. § 5121A, Substitution in case of death of claimant. It provides that if a claimant dies while a claim or appeal for any benefit under a law administered by the Secretary is pending, a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title may, not later than one year after the date of the death of the claimant, request to be substituted as the claimant for the purposes of processing the claim to completion.

The new statute allows a person who could be considered an accrued benefits claimant to substitute for a deceased claimant to continue adjudication of the deceased claimant’s claim.

Effective Date- The provisions of the new statute apply with respect to the claim of any claimant who dies on or after October 10, 2008.

VBA Action: Regulations will be revised to include the new provision. Pending regulatory change, for requests to be substituted for a deceased claimant:

  • A written claim for substitution must be filed within one year of the date of death of the claimant whose claim is at issue.
  • The claimant who requests to be substituted must be someone who would be eligible under 38 CFR 3.1000, Entitlement under 38 U.S.C. § 5121 to benefits due and unpaid upon death of a beneficiary.
  • Continue adjudication of the claim as if the original claimant was not deceased.
  • If evidence required to substantiate the claim cannot be obtained due to the original claimant’s death, the claim shall be rated based on the evidence of record. If an examination is required, consider 38 CFR § 3.655, Failure to report for Department of Veterans Affairs examination.
  • The date of claim for the request for substitution will be the date the written request for substitution is received in VA.
  • Any representation by a service organization, attorney or agent prior to death does not transfer to the substituted representative. If the individual desires representation he/she must execute a new power of attorney. When a request for substitution is received the new claimant should be advised of this fact.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Per NVLSP this change would make the idea of "accrued" benefits obselete-still payable but not technically accrued and the survivor, as substituted claimant would have the opportunity to submit any new evidence they could to support the veteran's claim which -in the past- was evidence that was limited only to that which was in the veteran;'s C file at time of death.(38 USC 5121 and 38 CFR 3.100.)

A formal request for substitution of a deceased claimant has the same time limits as any accrued claim. The request must be made within one year of the veteran';s death to the regional office with jurisdiction over the pending claim at time of the veteran's death.

All retroactive awards under this new amendment also come under the Bonny V Principi auspices- meaning accrued retro is not limited any more to 2 years accrued and the survivor will receive ALL accrued due the veteran less any comp paid in their lifetime.

hey,hey moderators how about bump this back to the top. THIS IS IMPORTANT to our SISTERS IN NEED>THANKS
Link to comment
Share on other sites

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use