Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Class Action Suit

Rate this question


VietVet68

Question

Hi to everyone,

I'm a newbie so if i'm in the wrong forum I'm sorry. I have a question about a suit that was filed. I can't find out the status of the suit other than one letter I got from:

VA Settlement Claims

PO Box 6727

Portland, OR 97228-6727

Here's the back story: I'm a "Life Member" of the DAV and they publish a magazine of current events. I believe it was the June 2009 edition that contained an article about the theft of a computer from a VA employee that had personal information about vets in it. It said that the "United States District Court for the District of Columbia" had begun notifying vets that a settlement had been reached with the Dept. of Veteran Affairs.

This theft occured on May 3, 2006 and the computer was recovered on June 28, 2006.

Specifically the suit is named; RE: VETERANS AFFAIRS (VA) DATA THEFT LITIGATION FOR CLASS NO. ****.

There is a web site to view: www.VeteransClass.com

On July 3, 2009 I submitted my form and sent it in. After hearing nothing since my submission I decided to write them a letter to find ou what was happening. That was on Dec. 3, 2009. I received a letter back from them dated Dec. 11, 2009 that said:

1. "Your claim submission has been received"

2. "It has been assigned a claim number indicated above."

3. "The Claims Administrator is currently processing your claim."

4. "If additional information is required to complete your claim, you will be notified in writing at a later date."

5. "This review process takes time, please be patient.

Does anybody have any knowledge about this suit?

Jack

Life Member:

USMC

DAV

MOPH

VVA

NRA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If class members get 100 dollars out of this case I would be surprised. At some point you may have to prove you were harmed to get extra benefits. The ones who benefit in class action suits are the lawyers and perhaps the first couple of guys who filed the suit. I was in a class action suit against the post office where I worked. It took 12 years to settle. The lawyers got a few million dollars. Two guys who first filed the EEOC case got about 70,000 bucks and the other class members got a few thousands dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If class members get 100 dollars out of this case I would be surprised. At some point you may have to prove you were harmed to get extra benefits. The ones who benefit in class action suits are the lawyers and perhaps the first couple of guys who filed the suit. I was in a class action suit against the post office where I worked. It took 12 years to settle. The lawyers got a few million dollars. Two guys who first filed the EEOC case got about 70,000 bucks and the other class members got a few thousands dollars.

I remember a number years back I was sent something to opt in/out of a class action suit but I forget what it was for. Anyway I opted in and sent the form back. A year or two later I got a check in the mail and a statement saying the case was settled and that my portion of the settlement was inclosed. The check was for 25 cents. It cost more to send in the form.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you were financially damaged by the Data theft-the DAV has a little more info here and a number to call:

http://www.dav.org/voters/NewsArticle.aspx?ID=120

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, I filed a claim to recover the costs for a credit monitoring service during the specified time period. As they said they have $20,000,000 to give away, I want my share. As far as proving I spent the money I was able to get copies of statements directly from Equifax, the credit monitoring service I use, along with copies of my bank statements because the cost was automatically deducted from my checking account. All the announcements were made in 2009 even though it occured in 2006. The judicial system we operate under is OK, but it's sure slow.

Life Member:

USMC

DAV

MOPH

VVA

NRA

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use