Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Just Got Soc

Rate this question


broncovet

Question

  • Lead Moderator

I am considering asking for a "Motion for Reconsideration" or even, as Berta has suggested, asking the vA to Cue themselves, because I really do not want to wait another 4 years at the BVA.

I am in a dispute with the VA for my effective date. Essentially, I am contending that, at a VA medical professional's offfice, I made an informal claim for benefits years ago.

I am just curios if you think it will do any good to ask for a MFR or ask the VA to Cue themselves. I only have 60 days to file an I9, or I will "loose" the possibility of an appeal. Do you think its ok to ask for a MFR at the same time I appeal, or, ask the VA to CUE themselves concurrently with this appeal? Thanks..Bronco.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Pete...

I have never heard of having a hearing with a rater. How do you go about this? Send in a 21-4138, or an IRIS? This is good information, Pete.

Probably real good. It could mean you can check the C file, make sure everything is there, and, importantly, ask the rater if everything is there to make a decision. Then, the VA would have little reason to delay you more, if they have already said everything is there to make a decision, assuming, of course, that you can "hold the rater to" what he says. Maybe it should be recorded!

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

I realy think Pete's idea is a good one. I would love to be able to ask them some questions, in person, in front of the rater with the C file. It has been my experience the VARO simply avoids answering my questions. For example, I got a recent copy of my C file, noticing there were hundreds of pages missing..including old RO decisions, VCAA letters, etc. So, I sent an IRIS email asking the question, " Do you have electronic copies of my old RO decisions and VCAA letters, or does the fact that they are missing from my C file mean that my evidence has been lost or shredded by the RO?"

The VA was on the spot, and I knew that. They "ducked" the question and never answered it. Oh, yes they sent me a reply, but they carefully worded it so as not to admit to shredding, but not get caught in a lie, either. This is one advantage of IRIS! I can keep copies of their response, and, if necessary, use their response as evidence to present to a judge! Telephone coversations would not work that way, but since IRIS is a secure email, the VA can't say something like that IRIS was not from the VA it was from a hacker!

If I was in person, in a hearing with a rater, especially with the conversation recorded, then I could simply ask them to answer the question, and wait for a response! They are going to either have to admit to shredding or, get caught in a lie. I already know my evidence was shredded..there is no doubt. The VA wont even give me "Special Handling", per Dr. Peak's fast letter 08-14, in part, because they dont want to admit to more shredding! They know that will open up a can of worms!

My goal would not to be to get the rater in trouble. Frankly, they are peons, and probably just want to get their paycheck and go home. VA management, I am convinced, is the problem. Why? Because one or even 2 "untrained mailroom employees" would not be able to shred Veterans evidence at 47 Regional Offices! The fact is that these

"untrained mailroom employees" ARE TRAINED..and doing exactly what they are told. There is no way that 47 mailroom employees would make the same mistake at once..all of them confusing yesterdays Burger King Wrapper with Veterans evidence and shredding it!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use