Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

C+p Examiner

Rate this question


aidenspapa

Question

SHE STATED IN HER C+P EXAM THAT MY SCHIZOPHRENIA/SCHIZOAFFECTIVE DISORDER WAS FIRST DIAGNOSED IN THE SERVICE AS PER THE SERVICE MEDICAL RECORDS.THEREFORE THE PERSONALITY DISORDER THAT THEY POSTED IN MY SEPERATION PAGES WAS INAPPROPRIATE( THIS IS THE VA C+P EXAMINER STATEING THIS)I WAS DENIED IT IS GOING TO DRO SOON,DO I HAVE A LEG TO STAND ON ACCORDING TO THE C+P EXAMINERS OWN REPORT,I WAS OFFERED SERVICE CONNECTION FROM PSYCH DRS IN USMC ON THE GROUNDS I TOOK MEDS.I REFUSED MEDS,YOUNG+STUPID.SO THEY PUT ME DOWN AS PERS DISORDER=NON COMPENSATIONAL.THANKS FOR FEEDBACK

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

What is strange about this claim is that the evidence in the SMR is so strong that the C&P doctor could not challenge the inservice onset of panic disorder. So the examiner "invents" the PD diagnoses to confuse the issues and offset a high rating. I think there should be a personality disorder diagnosis for clinicians who "invent" PD diagnoses to cheat veterans out of there benefits. We can call it the borderline Bulls--t anti compensation diagnosis disorder.

We actually got the C&P examiner to agree that the SMR from the 70's meets the DSM IV requirement for panic disorder without any current interviews withn the vetyeran.

Below is the requirement that the VA uses to establish PD that we are pre-empting

Personality disorders, which are characterized by developmental defects or pathological trends in the personality structure manifested by a lifelong pattern of action or behavior, or other psychiatric symptomatology shown to have existed prior to service with the same manifestations during service, which was the basis of the service diagnosis, will be accepted as showing pre-service origin. Personality disorders are not diseases or injuries within the meaning of applicable legislation for VA disability compensation purposes. Carpenter v. Brown, 8 Vet. App. 240 (1995); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.303©, 4.9 (2009).

Edited by Hoppy

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

For the record the C&P examiner specifically stated that the veterans unemployability is due to a personality disorder that pre-dated the military. Unemployability was not shown to exist prior to entry into the military. The veterans social security records show increasinly higher earning from the time of high school until entry into the military.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

For the record the C&P examiner specifically stated that the veterans unemployability is due to a personality disorder that pre-dated the military. Unemployability was not shown to exist prior to entry into the military. The veterans social security records show increasinly higher earning from the time of high school until entry into the military. No.it is actually inferred by C+p that i AM SERVICE CONNECTABLE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hoppy

Since me, you and half a dozen hadit members were DX'ed with PD's you have a very good analysis of how to defeat that gimmick. Lots of people with PD's work and are able to function. Half the people that propelled us into financial meltdown have anti-social personality disorders and they run hedge funds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use