Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Presumptive Within One Year

Rate this question


dav_marine72

Question

  • HadIt.com Elder

Hi Everyone,

I was service connected for a right and left foot injury out of the gate when I was discharged in 1995. I broke my right foot in boot camp and got a stress fracture in my left at Marine Combat Training. Come to find out over the years that my feet seem to have been the cause of most of my medical misery. Prior to entering service I had nthing wrong with my feet and never saw a doc for them.

The docs figured out that I had severe pes cavus which led to the fractures and my L3-S1 discs rotting out. This was based on all the running and humping out at old camp horno at Pendleton. Anyway they gave me 10% for the right intially and 0% for the left. My right always seemed worse and at the time I wasn't feeling the effects of my back so I acceted the decisions. In 2000 I asked for an increase for my right and left feet based on the severity of each getting worse.

By the time I asked for the increase I had been seen from 96-00 about 10-15 times for my feet. In 1996 less than a year after discharge the VA diagnosed me with pes cavus, equinus, and rigid feet. They tried orthodics and special shoes but it made my feet worse. In 1997 I was diagnosed with pes cavus, equinus, and nerve entrapment on the top of my feet. For those that don't know pes cavus is high arch feet. So any shoes or sneakers I wear kill the top of my feet. Then in early 2000 in addtion to the pes cavus, equinus, and nerve entrapment the civilan doc diagnosed me with tarsal tunnel syndrome. He gaveme steroid shots in both feet but they did nothing. He wanted to operate but I refused. In 2002 I started seeing the VA podiatry again and they gave me special shoes and new orthodics. I was denied all along the way for any increases.

I had a hearing at the RO in 2004 where I asked why they could not try to incorporate my pes cavus, equinus, or nerve entrapment either into the rating or see if they could rate me higher based on any of those aliments. She went back and reviewed the case. In her decision she stated that my pes cavus, equinus, and nerve in trapment could not be linked to my feet injuries in service. She said I would need to try and file service connections for those if I thought they were secondaries. Well years later I found the VA treatment notes showing the dagnosis of pes cavus and equinus less than a year out of service. My feet made their way to the BVA and got shot down during the mean time. Then they went to the CAVC and got sent back on joint remands. Because of all my back problems I put going to podiatry on hold for years. In 2009 I ended up going to a civilan and VA podiatrists. I was diagnosed with severe pes cavus, severe equinus with 0% dorsflexion of my ankles (normal is 10%), arthitis (by xray), and nerve entrapment of the tops of both feet.

So my main question here is since I was diagnosed with pes cavus and equinus back in 96 less than a year out of service and had no feet problems prior to service don't they have to consider all these other feet problems in my ratings?

USMC 1st Battalion 1st Marines 1st Marine Division 91-95

100% P&T

"The willingness with which our young people are likely to serve in any war, no matter how justified, shall be directly proportional to how they perceive the Veterans of earlier wars were treated and appreciated by their nation."

George Washington

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

If you file for conditions within one year of discharge some are considered presumptive. In general, if you don't file for a condition the VA does not grant it. On secondary conditions you have to file a claim based on medical report that makes the link between the secondary and primary SC condition. The VA will not do it on their own. Even if you have an obvious secondary condition the VA will do nothing until you file a claim even on a presumptive condition like agent orange.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use