This is a success story. However, I am posting in claims and research because I have a lot more to say about the process than just a statement that we won. Also before I get started and bury a question I have in what will be a long post I will ask the question now.
Does anyone know of the process for having a compensation and pension examiner reprimanded or barred from performing compensation and pension examinations? The compensation and pension examiner wrote a report that was adversarial. He wrote an opinion that stated that the veteran's symptoms in the military were caused by a nonservice connectable condition that predated service. His opinion directly contradicted as existing opinion of record. More importantly it is an accepted medical principle that the cause of the veteran symptoms in the military cannot be attributed any single etiology. There were other errors and presumptions made by the clinician.
The fact that a veteran has the ability to rebut or otherwise present evidence in support of the claim does not excuse an individual who is bound by professional standards of doing a professional job. A labor law attorney I previously worked with presented this argument against a professional involved in a workers compensation law suit. I am very interested in pursuing a complaint against the clinician. If you have any ideas please advise me. If this were a workers compensation claim or civil claim the complaint will be filed with presiding judge.
Now for the success story and how the long battle unfolded.
When I first met the veteran he was homeless and living in his car. I tried to get them to go to the VA hospital and see a social worker. As time went on I realized that he was diagnosed in the military under the DSM II with a non-service connectable personality disorder. After reading the service medical records it was obvious to me that under the DSM-IV he would have been diagnosed with a service connectable panic disorder. For the purpose of obtaining a compensation and pension examination we obtained an opinion from the primary care Dr. The primary care Dr. reviewed the service medical records and determined that his current diagnosis of panic disorder was related to the symptoms in the military. This should have been sufficient to get a compensation and pension examination. Unfortunately, the claim was denied without any exam. This forced me to obtain a report from another clinician. I wrote a brief summary of the history of the claim and sent it to a qualified specialist who worked as a staff clinician at a VA hospital. Fortunately this clinician became interested in the case and reviewed all the records. The clinician wrote a very favorable and strong report.
The new report did in fact cause the regional office to schedule a C&P exam. Unfortunately, the C&P examiner made some wild guesses about the nature of the veteran's lifetime battle with panic disorder. What is most bothersome is the report took advantage of speculative theories and flawed conclusions based on invalid experimental designs. The report ignored any symptoms that could be explained by individual differences of symptoms that are known to occur in service connectable conditions that had been diagnosed by treating clinicians and are a matter of record. The most apparent aberration was the problem of assigning a single etiology to the veteran symptoms. Had the etiology been correct the condition would have been considered to have existed prior to entry into the military. The manner in which this was stated gave the false representation that an unconfirmed theory had somehow been validated. I'm of the opinion the examiner did everything he could to write an adversarial report that would result in a loss of benefits. It appears that the DRO gave weight to the opinion of the examiner who was the staff clinician at a VA hospital rather than the C&P examiner.
The good news is that a DRO service connected the veteran at 50%. I have not seen the decision yet. However, I am very sure that the award was based on the report I obtained from the VAMC staff clinician. We do plan to file for an upgrade. The veteran has not worked in four years and has been receiving Social Security for the panic disorder for the last two years.
Question
Hoppy
This is a success story. However, I am posting in claims and research because I have a lot more to say about the process than just a statement that we won. Also before I get started and bury a question I have in what will be a long post I will ask the question now.
Does anyone know of the process for having a compensation and pension examiner reprimanded or barred from performing compensation and pension examinations? The compensation and pension examiner wrote a report that was adversarial. He wrote an opinion that stated that the veteran's symptoms in the military were caused by a nonservice connectable condition that predated service. His opinion directly contradicted as existing opinion of record. More importantly it is an accepted medical principle that the cause of the veteran symptoms in the military cannot be attributed any single etiology. There were other errors and presumptions made by the clinician.
The fact that a veteran has the ability to rebut or otherwise present evidence in support of the claim does not excuse an individual who is bound by professional standards of doing a professional job. A labor law attorney I previously worked with presented this argument against a professional involved in a workers compensation law suit. I am very interested in pursuing a complaint against the clinician. If you have any ideas please advise me. If this were a workers compensation claim or civil claim the complaint will be filed with presiding judge.
Now for the success story and how the long battle unfolded.
When I first met the veteran he was homeless and living in his car. I tried to get them to go to the VA hospital and see a social worker. As time went on I realized that he was diagnosed in the military under the DSM II with a non-service connectable personality disorder. After reading the service medical records it was obvious to me that under the DSM-IV he would have been diagnosed with a service connectable panic disorder. For the purpose of obtaining a compensation and pension examination we obtained an opinion from the primary care Dr. The primary care Dr. reviewed the service medical records and determined that his current diagnosis of panic disorder was related to the symptoms in the military. This should have been sufficient to get a compensation and pension examination. Unfortunately, the claim was denied without any exam. This forced me to obtain a report from another clinician. I wrote a brief summary of the history of the claim and sent it to a qualified specialist who worked as a staff clinician at a VA hospital. Fortunately this clinician became interested in the case and reviewed all the records. The clinician wrote a very favorable and strong report.
The new report did in fact cause the regional office to schedule a C&P exam. Unfortunately, the C&P examiner made some wild guesses about the nature of the veteran's lifetime battle with panic disorder. What is most bothersome is the report took advantage of speculative theories and flawed conclusions based on invalid experimental designs. The report ignored any symptoms that could be explained by individual differences of symptoms that are known to occur in service connectable conditions that had been diagnosed by treating clinicians and are a matter of record. The most apparent aberration was the problem of assigning a single etiology to the veteran symptoms. Had the etiology been correct the condition would have been considered to have existed prior to entry into the military. The manner in which this was stated gave the false representation that an unconfirmed theory had somehow been validated. I'm of the opinion the examiner did everything he could to write an adversarial report that would result in a loss of benefits. It appears that the DRO gave weight to the opinion of the examiner who was the staff clinician at a VA hospital rather than the C&P examiner.
The good news is that a DRO service connected the veteran at 50%. I have not seen the decision yet. However, I am very sure that the award was based on the report I obtained from the VAMC staff clinician. We do plan to file for an upgrade. The veteran has not worked in four years and has been receiving Social Security for the panic disorder for the last two years.
Edited by HoppyLink to comment
Share on other sites
Top Posters For This Question
2
2
1
1
Popular Days
Jun 1
8
Jun 5
4
Jun 2
2
Jun 6
1
Top Posters For This Question
Hoppy 2 posts
MikeR 2 posts
dav_marine72 1 post
*Bergie* 1 post
Popular Days
Jun 1 2010
8 posts
Jun 5 2010
4 posts
Jun 2 2010
2 posts
Jun 6 2010
1 post
14 answers to this question
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now