Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

Top 10 VA Disability Claims Articles

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Big Brown Envelope

Rate this question

joeyjoeyb

Asked by joeyjoeyb,

 Share

Question

joeyjoeyb Collaborator

joeyjoeyb

Posted
Posted

Put in for increase on 4 things back in Oct 09...went from zero to 10% on 2 of the claims and 2 were deferred. The two increases also put me from 50% to 60%. I am really happy.

I am a little confused on the 2 claims that were deferred. I am not sure what that means exactly. It says in the decision letter that they were deferred for the following information : VA examiner's medical opinion. What does that mean?

Again, wanted to thank this board. I sure wish I knew about it when I retired 4 years ago. Everything just makes alot more sense now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

7 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Berta

Berta

Posted
Posted

It looks to me that they were deferred pending the results of C & P exams. Have they scheduled yo yet for these C & Ps? If I were you I would get a copy of the results of those exams as soon as they are completely to get a leg up on what they might decide.

You did very well so far and this decision didn't take too long compared to most decisions.Are you still employed?

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • HadIt.com Elder
Pete53 Grand Master

Pete53

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

Congrats on your win and deferred means they are not finished yet.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
joeyjoeyb Collaborator

joeyjoeyb

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

It looks to me that they were deferred pending the results of C & P exams. Have they scheduled yo yet for these C & Ps? If I were you I would get a copy of the results of those exams as soon as they are completely to get a leg up on what they might decide.

You did very well so far and this decision didn't take too long compared to most decisions.Are you still employed?

They deferred my hearing loss and tinnitus. Here is the thing. I had a C&P and hearing test for my initial claims in 2007. I claimed a "right ear condition". Because I had my right ear drained a few times while on active duty and it always felt full and had that annoying buzzing. I did the ENT exam and then the hearing test. The ENT doc wrote up the report saying everything looked fine. He asked me if I was experiencing any hearing loss and told him yes and that I had a C&P the following week and we would see what the test shows. Well he submitted his report before I even had the hearing test saying all was good and I had no hearing loss. Well when I did the hearing test, it showed mild hearing loss in the right ear. Denied for right ear condition.

So now fast forward to 2009....my hearing was getting worse along with the buzzing sound. So I went to an ENT in town through tricare and they did a hearing test on me. Well it had gotten alot worse. So I asked my VSO if I could reopen the claim. He said I would have to have new evidence. I submitted a claim for hearing loss and tinnitus. My local ENT approved me for a hearing aid. I went to my C&P on May 19 and had another audio exam. The right ear was worse. The audioligist asked me why did they not do an ENT exam on me back in 2007. I told her they did. Then she said "wow, they did it backwards", they should have done the audio test first and then ENT exam. I wonder why they did that way. I told her, that is what I was trying to explain all along. How could they write a report up in 2007, when he did not even have the hearing test yet. The doctor for my latest C&P hearing test, put that in the C&P notes, that I saw in ENT, but they did not have a hearing test available (because I did not do it until the next week), and that I had my hearing test done AFTER the ENT appointment. And back in 2007 ENT recommended an ENT eval to address conductive hearing loss in right ear. THAT NEVER HAPPENED

So I am not sure if I am waiting for another ENT appointment now. Or is the VA looking to see if I was incorrectly rated back in 2007. If I get 10% for tinnitus (my hearing loss will get me 0% as of now), I am wondering if that could go back to 2006 when I first filed my initial claim. I was rated at 40% initially and got up graded to 50% in Nov 2008. So that 10% for tinnitus would have given me 50% way back in 2006. Do I have a possible CUE here? Do I need to call and set up my own C&P? Or wait to the VA to do it.

I know this is rambling on a bit, but I have wondered since my intital exam, how could they rate my on the hearing loss and tinnitus, when they did my hearing test after the ENT appointment and the ENT doc did not have anything to base his decision on, except for looking in my ear?

Edited by joeyjoeyb
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SLEDGE Mentor

SLEDGE

Posted
Posted

" I know this is rambling on a bit, but I have wondered since my intital exam, how could they rate my on the hearing loss and tinnitus, when they did my hearing test after the ENT appointment and the ENT doc did not have anything to base his decision on, except for looking in my ear? "

Unfortunately, what you are experiencing is normal business as usual at the VA.

The doctors wing it, you don't even have to be there, and the Regional Office does whatever they can to move the paperwork along.

Congress and the VA make a big deal out of the severe backlog of initial claims.

Which congress and the VA caused by going for numbers instead of quality in their work.

We suffer along waiting and the VA jerks receive larger bonus checks.

This is legalized fraud supported by the government.

If they ever change the standard to 'doing-it-right-the-first-time' the backlog will take care of itself, congress will have to use some other contrived BS to get elected and many more disabled veterans will be able to get the right kind of help and eventually return to the workforce.

Keep getting copies of the examination reports and all other papers generated by your involvement with the VA.

Resubmit whatever they should have looked at before the stupid denial.

Try to get everything you turned into the VA date stamped by any VA clerk at any VA facility.

Don't miss any appeal time limits.

Don't do anything rash or stupid yourself.

Don't abandon your claims.

We can't say when but, you will win your earned benefits.

sledge

Those that need help the most are the ones least likely to receive help from the VA.

It's up to us to help each other.

sledge twkelly@hotmail.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stillhere Veteran

stillhere

Posted
Posted

That is a little out of the norm. I had the hearing test and then had to have a ENT approval before I could even get my hearing aids. Did they give you hearing aids? Sometimes I have heard if you our not a cadidate for aides they do the ENT to see if there is any problem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • HadIt.com Elder
Pete53 Grand Master

Pete53

Posted
  • HadIt.com Elder
Posted

If you need a hearing aide they usually give you one without to much of a hassle.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to question listing


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!

  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      Lebro
      Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      stuart55
      stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      stuart55
      stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      Lebro
      Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      Sparklinger
      Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post

  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection

      Tbird posted a record in VA Claims and Benefits Information,

      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
      Tbird

      Picked By

      Tbird,

    • Post in ICD Codes and SCT CODES?WHAT THEY MEAN?

      Timothy cawthorn posted an answer to a question,

      Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
      yellowrose

      Picked By

      yellowrose,

    • Post in Chevron Deference overruled by Supreme Court

      broncovet posted a post in a topic,

      VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in Re-embursement for non VA Medical care.

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,

    • Post in What is the DIC timeline?

      broncovet posted an answer to a question,

      Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
      Lemuel

      Picked By

      Lemuel,
    View All
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use

  I accept