Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Vaoig: Sterilization Of Reusable Medical Equipment An Issue At Fargo Va


pacmanx1

Recommended Posts

  • Moderator

VAOIG: STERILIZATION OF REUSABLE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT AN ISSUE AT FARGO VA

Annual competencies for the colonoscope, the bronchoscope, the cystoscope, and the orthopedic instruments had not been completed.

by Larry Scott, VA Watchdog dot Org

On September 20, 2010, the VA's Office of Inspector General (VAOIG) released the following report:

Combined Assessment Program Review of the Fargo VA Medical Center, Fargo, North Dakota -- Report Number 09-03745-250, 9/20/2010 | Summary | [url=http://www4.va.gov/oig/CAP/VAOIG-09-03745-250.pdf]Report

The Executive Summary is posted below.

Executive Summary: Combined Assessment Program Review of the Fargo VA Medical Center, Fargo, North Dakota

Review Purpose:

The purpose was to evaluate selected activities, focusing on patient care administration and quality management. We conducted the review the week of June 28, 2010.

Review Results:

The review covered eight activities. We made no recommendations in the following activities:

Coordination of Care

Physician Credentialing and Privileging]

Quality Management

Suicide Prevention Safety Plans

The facility's reported accomplishment was the community living center "Wishes on Wings" program where a veteran on hospice status can request to have a wish granted.

Recommendations:

We made recommendations in the following four activities:

Reusable Medical Equipment: Annual competency assessments and training need to be completed and documented for applicable staff, and all standard operating procedures for reusable medical equipment need to reflect current practice.

Environment of Care: Weekly rounds data needs to be consistently tracked, trended, and reported to the oversight committee quarterly. Annual respirator fit testing, training, and medical evaluation need to be completed for all identified staff. The local hand hygiene policy needs to be updated, and clinical staff need to receive feedback. All staff who work on the locked mental health unit and members of the Multidisciplinary Safety Inspection Team need to receive training on environmental hazards that pose a risk to suicidal patients.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safety: The local magnetic resonance imaging safety policy needs to include emergency procedures unique to the area, and staff need to be aware of how to respond to those emergencies.

Medication Management: Community living center clinicians need to document all required influenza vaccine elements. A consistent process for documenting the retrospective review of medication orders placed when the onsite pharmacy is closed needs to be implemented.

Comments

The Acting Veterans Integrated Service Network and Facility Directors agreed with the Combined Assessment Program review findings and recommendations and provided acceptable improvement plans. We will follow up on the planned actions until they are completed.

(original signed by:)

JOHN D. DAIGH, JR., M.D. Assistant Inspector General for Healthcare Inspections

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

People at the VA who allow dirty equipment to be used should go to jail. This would light a fire under their sorry asses to do the right thing. I would never go for any colonoscopy at my VAMC. I even worry about them taking blood or doing dental work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Same here. I ended up going through a procedure at a VAMC with questionable equipment sterilization. Worst weeks of my life - waiting on blood test results checking for the rumored infections. NEVER AGAIN. Thank God I have private insurance.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      First Post
    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use