Jump to content
  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims


    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   


  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Available Subscriptions

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • 0
Sign in to follow this  

Bva Brown Envelope Received Today


Hi All,

I posted this topic in Sucess Stories and thought I post it here as well. It seems that more people visit this forum than the Sucess Story forum. Please do not get upset I just want answers to my questions. I am editing it to add a 3rd question.

Question what kind of rating do yu think they will give my husband for neck and cervical spine that was granted as secondary to his service-connected left knee injury.?. Question: After Reading TDIU section below under Remand, Do you think they will now grant him his TDIU? Question: What's up with BVA not rating claim after granting claim?.

My husband got his Brown Envelope from the BVA today. We are very happy. My husband had originally put in one claim for neck and cervical spine injuries stating that service connection was warranted for a disability of the cervical spine as it was incurred secondary to his fall caused by his service-connected left knee condition. They granted him service connection for his neck and cervical spine as secondary to his left knee service connection injury. BVA states: "On July 30, 2008 the Veteran fell injuring his neck while getting out of a car.......... A cervical discectomy was performed and...... The most recent records from the Veteran's private physician included a December 2009 MRI report showing numerous central disc protrusions along the cervical spine with central canal narrowing. Therefore the record establishes the presence of a current cervical spine disability. The record also contains medical and lay evidence in support of a nexus between the Veteran's current cervical spine disability and the service-connected residuals of a tibia fracture. The record therefore contains two medical oopinions in favor of the claim and lay statements describing how the Veteran fell due to his left knee disability. A claim will be denied only if the preponderance of the evidence is against the claim. In this case, the evidence weighs in favor of a nexus between the Veteran's residuals from a cervical disc herniation and discectomy and his ervice-connected left knee disability. Accordifngly, the claim is granted." As many of you know his RO denied his claim stating that his primary doctor was not at scene of accident and therefore could not give his IMO that my husband's service connected left knee injury was the cause of him falling and having to undergo neck and cervical spine surgery.

However, decision does not state in it about his neck except what it states above about falling injuring his neck, etc. It also does not give a rating. What's up with that? RO will probably give a low ball rating because they probably are upset that this was granted after they denied it for so long.

Under order in decision it states: "Entiment to service connection for residuals of a cervical disc herniation and discectomy as secondary to service-connected residuals of a left tibia fracture is granted." Under Issues they list 22 issues. Under Remand they state: "The also finds that the Veteran should be afforded an additional VA examination to determine the current severity of his service-connected residuals of a left tibia fracture and left knee subluxation........"

it goes on to state: "With respect to the Veteran's claim for TDIU, the claim is inextrcably interwined with the grant of service connection for a cervical spine disability discussed abgove. After implementing the Board's grant of service connection, the RO should readjudicate the claim for TDIU. The Board notes that the Veteran's residuals of a left tibia fracture, left knee recurrent subluxation, and left knee tender scar are disagilities of a common etiology, and therefore meet the schedular criteria for agrant of TDIU under 38 C.F.R. section 4.16(a)."

"Finally, the Veteran's June 2009 notice of disagreement expressed disagreement with all the claims addessed by the RO in the March 2009 reating decision, including entitlement to service connection for hypertensive heart disease, eye retinopathy, high cholesterol, and entitlement to special monthly comepensation for loss of the use of a creative organ. These claims were not addressed in any of the May 2010 statements of the case. AS the Veteran has not been provided a statement of the case addressing all the claims included in the June 2009 notice of disagreement a remand is required for the issurance of a statement of the case on the remaining issues. Accordingly, the case is REMANDED for the following action: (1) Send the Veteran a letter that complies with 38 U.S.C.A. section 5103(a) and 38 C.F.R. section 3.159(b) including notice regarding all his claim for secondary service connection and increased rating for residuals of a left tibia fracture and left knee subluxation. (2)The Veteran should be provided a medical release form and specifically requested to execute it to authorize VA to obtain complete medical treatment records from his private primary care physician Dr. X. (3) Obtain records of treatment from Dr. X. If unsuccessful in obtaining this evidence, inform the Veteran and his representative and request them to provide the outstanding evidence. (My husband no longer has a representative, he fired DAV in June, that's why we are surprised that it list them as Representing him at BVA in this decision. Evidently DAV here did not tell Washington.) (4) Afford the Veteran a VA orthopedic examination to determine the current severity of his service-connected residuals of a left tibia fracture and left knee subluxation. The claims folders should be made available to and reviewed by the examiner, and the examiner should note such review in the report. It goes on to list from a-g what the examer should do and how it should be done. (e) states The examiner should state whether it is at least as likely as not that any currently present gout, right knee disability, or left thigh atrophy were caused or aggrevated by the Veteran's service-connected residuals of a left tibia and left knee disability. (f)The examiner should state whether it is at least as likely as not that any current lumbar spine disability was caused or aggravated by the Veteran's service-connected residuals of a left tibia fracture and left knee disability. (g) Then the examiner should opine as to whether without regard to the Veteran's age or the impact of any nonservice

-connected disabilities. It is at least as likely as not that his service-connected disabilities, and, in particular, his residuals of a left tibia fracture and cervical spine disability, either alone or in the aggregate, render him unable to secure or follow a substantially gainful occupation. If the Veteran's service-connected disabilities do not cumulatively render him unemployable, the examiner should suggest the type or types of employment in which the Veteran would be capable of engaging with his current service-connected disailities, given his current skill set and edc=ucational background. (5) Issue a statement of the case to the appellant and his representative on the issues of entitlement to service connection for hypertensive heart disease, eye retinopathy, high cholesterol,and entitlement to special monthly compensation for loss of the use of a creative organ. The Veteran should also be informed of the requirements to perfect an appeal with respect to this issue. (6) Readjudicate the other claims on appeal. If the benefits sought on appeal are not fully granted the RO should issue a supplemental statement of the case before returning the case to the Board, if otherwise in order.

The appellant has the right to submit additional evidence and arguments on the matters the Board has remanded. This claim must be afforded expeditions treatment...... Well we all know that the RO does not pay attention to expeditionsly and I feel these issues won't be resolved for another year or more.

In this decision they give the finding on his CUE claim which they denied, I'll give those findings in the CUE claim section later on.They list all of the 5 things you can do if you are not satisfied with their decision.

Sorry for such a long post.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

No one can give you the answer you are looking for. You have two issues here.

1- The RO will send your husband for a rating on the issues addressed and awarded by the BVA. 2 - Then you will deal with all other issues not properly addressed prior and you will get a SOC on those then another fight may ensue depending on how those are addressed.

IMO , I think the BVA is giving the RO notice that the new rating for the awarded issues will meet the criteria for IU alone, and this should be your main focus right now as the RO will need to address the other claims separately and this will take time.

Just keep on top of the VA on the BVA awards, and if you have a POA make sure they are doing the same........If your husband is suffering depression because of all this, make sure this is also addressed.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites


Thanks JR for your reply. I thought by asking what they think they would give me some answers as to what they think not what the VA would do.

If anyone has cervical spine injury can they please tell us what kind of rating they have. Like I said we expect the VA to low ball him on this rating because they had all this information before them and they denied him. He is already at 60%. He does not have a DAV representative anymore, because his DAV rep. didn't want him to appeal to BVA. However we will keep on top of the situation. I just hope they don't continue to delay in giving him his new rating and IU.

So please anyone who has cervical spine ratings can you give us your rating and what you think in the range he might get. Thanks in advance for your replys.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

JR is correct your question would require a guess at most.

The BVA basically decided your case and now a C&P will have to be done to decide the rate of compensation, and of course how it effects his daily life.

I would like to tell you this will be done yesterday but in reality this will take time. How long have you been waiting for the BVA decision?

I am with you on why doesn't the BVA rate claims but I have seen in the past some they do and some they don't. It appears to me that when the veterans specifically appeals to the BVA on the basis of the wrong rating then in those cases the BVA does order the RO what rate to use based on the information they have with the file.

If you want to just try and guess go to the rate tables and read the qualifications for skeletal injuries and you will see how daunting a task it is.

You won the award and that is the best step!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hi Stillhere, and thanks for your reply.

The BVA answer came fast because we let them know this was being filed under hardship. The claim was sent to BVA on July 10, 2010 and answer came September 20, 2010. We were surprised but happy they answer so fast. However, we don't think they will be as fast as giving him an IU C&P, etc. He had a IU C&P exam in 2009, in which they denied him IU. We are hoping that they don't have to go through all the remand issues before they give him his 2010 IU C&P exam to rate him for IU. In his 2009 IU C&P exam states: "Vet is not able to be successfully employed in any position that requires walking or climbing due to his left and self reported right knee DJD. He would be also unable to perform any job which required standing or sitting for 10-15 minutes due to his NSC C and LS condition. Overall moderately severe functional impairment from these conditions. The C and LS conditions refer to his cervical spine injury.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that is great they are honoring your hardship at the BVA and deciding in your favor there. Lets hope they continue honoring it and get your husband's comped due him right away.

Again I wish there was an easy answer for you but I would recommend that you stay on them as much as possible and I would even contact the BVA if you feel the RO is moving to slow. See if you can get some kind of direct contact to your RO from the BVA (phone # or Fax#) that might help.

Unfortunately I have read bad stories in the past as to RO's dragging their feet when making payments but I do wish you the best!!

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • SHOW YOUR SUPPORT: Ad Free Subscriptions to the Forum available
      Ad free subscriptions are available for the forum. Subscriptions give you the forums ad free and help support the forum and site. Monthly $5 Annually $50 https://community.hadit.com/subscriptions/

      Every bit helps - Thank you.

      • 0 replies
    • Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask
      Choosing a VA Disability Attorney Means Learning What Questions to Ask. Chris Attig - Veterans Law Blog 

      <br style="color:#000000; text-align:start">How to Hire an Attorney For Your VA Claim or Appeal Free Guidebook available on the Veterans Law Blog

      I got an email the other day from a Veteran.  It had 2 or 3 sentences about his claim, and then closed at the end: “Please call me. So-and-so told me you were the best and I want your help.”

      While I appreciate the compliments, I shudder a little at emails like this.  For 2 reasons.

      First, I get a lot of emails like this.  And while I diligently represent my clients – I often tell them we will pursue their claim until we have no more appeals or until we win – I am most assuredly not the best.

      There are a LOT of damn good VA Disability attorneys out there.  (Most, if not all, of the best are members of the National Organization of Veterans Advocates…read about one of them, here)

      Second, I don’t want Veterans to choose their attorney based on who their friend thought was the best.  I want Veterans to choose the VA Disability attorney who is BEST for their case.

      In some situations, that may be the Attig Law Firm.

      But it may also be be Hill and Ponton, or Chisholm-Kilpatrick, or Bergman Moore.  Or any one of the dozens of other attorneys who have made the representation of Veterans their professional life’s work.

      There are hundreds of attorneys that are out there representing Veterans, and I’m here to tell you that who is best for your friend’s case may not be the best for your case.

      How do you Find the Best VA Disability Attorney for your Claim?

      First, you have to answer the question: do you NEED an attorney?

      Some of you don’t...
      • 1 reply
    • VA Emergency Medical Care
      VA Emergency Medical Care
      • 3 replies
    • Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      Veterans Appeals Improvement and Modernization Act
      • 0 replies
    • Thanks Berta for your help. I did receive my 100% today for my IU claim on 6/20/2018. It only took 64 days to complete and it is p&t. Thanks for your words of wisdom. 

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines