Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Smc S

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

I got a email for lawyers at the NLVSP and they say Bradley is settled law. There was an attempt by the VA to upset it in 2009, but it failed so if you are IU plus 60% go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • Replies 21
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

John....In Bradley they state IU is the same as 100% disabled when deciding an SMC claim, do you know if the 60% is one disability that is rated at 60% or can it be a culmination of ratings that equal 60% or greater..For instance I have TDIU as a rating then I have a 70% plus about 6 20% ratings and 3 10% ratings....Are they saying that TDIU is in itself a rating or are they raising let's say the 70% rating to 100% TDIU so therefore the 70% cannot be used again in deciding a higher level of AA??

I got a email for lawyers at the NLVSP and they say Bradley is settled law. There was an attempt by the VA to upset it in 2009, but it failed so if you are IU plus 60% go for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I would apply.

pr

John....In Bradley they state IU is the same as 100% disabled when deciding an SMC claim, do you know if the 60% is one disability that is rated at 60% or can it be a culmination of ratings that equal 60% or greater..For instance I have TDIU as a rating then I have a 70% plus about 6 20% ratings and 3 10% ratings....Are they saying that TDIU is in itself a rating or are they raising let's say the 70% rating to 100% TDIU so therefore the 70% cannot be used again in deciding a higher level of AA??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is attorney Ron Abram's testimony to H VAC on SMC and Bradley:

http://veterans.house.gov/hearings/Testimony.aspx?TID=59742&Newsid=442&Name=%20Ronald%20B.%20Abrams

100% SC or TDIU SC plus an independent service connected disability at 60 % equals SMC s award.

The key wording is 'independent'.

Personal example:

My husband was 100% SC for PTSD.

He had "independent" DMII, IHD, and as well as CVA found as due to his AO exposure.

The IHD alone requires 60% rating per the AO IHD regs.( The VA has never rated this FTCA disability but has to now under Nehmer and the new IHD regs ans resolve my CUE as to the lack of rating)

100% SC for PTSD plus 60% for SC IHD equals SMC "S" award.

I think he is eligible for "M" because the evidence indicates that at some point his IHD was 100% and it caused his death, and his CVA (SC) was 100%.

Three separate and independent SC awards at 100% with SMC S eligibility should garner the SMC M Award.

(that is a very unusual situation and maybe this will help someone else)

But my point here is that the regs say "independent " disabilities and as far as I know the additional independent disabilty for the "S" award must be rated at least at 60%.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

just to clarify-

3 independent 100% SC awards that satisfy the steps up to SMC "L" levels should garner the M award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Berta...I think I understand what you are saying and that is the 60% rating cannot be a culmination of ratings that will equal the 60% or how the VA applies their math in computing the 60%. You say the key word is "Independent"...now I read here, where the Statute is saying if the veteran

has additional service connected disability or "disabilities" (meaning more than one)....are they saying the culmination of "disabilities" need to be independent of the 100% rating or TDIU or are they saying as I think what I understand you to be saying is that it needs to be a 60% rating in and of itself without adding multiple disabilities to get to the 60% rating? (God, that's confusing even for me and I wrote it....) I know what I mean but sometimes it doesn't flow out from my mind onto print...so forgive me if you are confused in what I am asking..

38 U.S.C. § 1114(s) provides that SMC at the (s) rate will be granted if a veteran has a service-connected disability rated as total, and (1) has additional service-connected disability or disabilities independently ratable at 60 percent or more, or (2) is permanently housebound by reason of a service-connected disability or disabilities.

This is attorney Ron Abram's testimony to H VAC on SMC and Bradley:

http://veterans.hous...d%20B.%20Abrams

100% SC or TDIU SC plus an independent service connected disability at 60 % equals SMC s award.

The key wording is 'independent'.

Personal example:

My husband was 100% SC for PTSD.

He had "independent" DMII, IHD, and as well as CVA found as due to his AO exposure.

The IHD alone requires 60% rating per the AO IHD regs.( The VA has never rated this FTCA disability but has to now under Nehmer and the new IHD regs ans resolve my CUE as to the lack of rating)

100% SC for PTSD plus 60% for SC IHD equals SMC "S" award.

I think he is eligible for "M" because the evidence indicates that at some point his IHD was 100% and it caused his death, and his CVA (SC) was 100%.

Three separate and independent SC awards at 100% with SMC S eligibility should garner the SMC M Award.

(that is a very unusual situation and maybe this will help someone else)

But my point here is that the regs say "independent " disabilities and as far as I know the additional independent disabilty for the "S" award must be rated at least at 60%.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use