Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

New Dea Percocet Daily Limitations?

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Has anyone receiving opiates for chronic pain been informed that the DEA has recently limited the daily dosage to a maximum of four (4) tablets per day as opposed to the previous limit of six (6)?

I was so informed last week by my "new" PCP.

Has anyone been informed that blood and urine labs have been limited to once per 90 days?

I was so informed last week by my "new" PCP.

I have a very strong suspicion that my "new" PCP has a aversion to prescribing narcotics. She is also unwilling to order labs sooner than every 90 days even though my thyroid results have gone off the charts.

I will at least give her the benefit of the doubt if there are others here who have been given similar limitations.

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

Well, my percoset was brought down to 4 a day from 6. They told me this is because I take fentanyl patch. I understand that they are worried about the tylenol in percoset. I do agree that the VA has turned on their heels and are averse to prescribing narcotics now. They are getting heat due to all the prescription drug abuse. The thing with the labs is probably just something to save money. The VA has a cookie cutter approach to pain control. After 6 years of being on narcotics I was told it was all a mistake and I should never have been given narcotics for all these years. Would that be malpractice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

they haven't cut mine back yet I get 140 every 28 days last refill was last week but it won't surprise me to see them cut back on them since they are getting hammered by the FDA due to the liver damage caused by the pills

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

"She is also unwilling to order labs sooner than every 90 days even though my thyroid results have gone off the charts."

Good luck with trying to get labs any sooner. My appointsments are between 90 days to six months for yrs now.

The cut in percocets may be due to acudomenifen, (spelling) the DEA is saying causes liver damage.

Liver, Kidney function and Thyroid is something I would like to see more often with taking Depacote.

Some Dr's have more trouble then others treating patients with chronic pain. You have to find one that knows how to treat chronic pain and takes an interest in relieving it.

I take as low a dose of breakthrough and controlled release as they have. I don't like waking up screaming out of a dead sleep. But don't want to keep getting the dose increased where the medication no longer has an effect. Also it's taking high doses of pain meds is where you can get alot of problems, besides functioning like a zombie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the FDA and DEA and doctors or patients are worried about the acetaminophen in percocet, you could ask your doctor to just give you the oxycodone alone. I believe that they make the oxycodone pills as low as 5 mg. I read where the reason that they put acetaminophen in percocet is because it reduces fever and has a different added analgesic effect. But there are lots of people that get good pain relief with just the oxycodone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use