Jump to content

Sponsored Ads



  • Latest Donations

  • Advertisemnt

  • 14 Questions about VA Disability Compensation Benefits Claims

    questions-001@3x.png

    When a Veteran starts considering whether or not to file a VA Disability Claim, there are a lot of questions that he or she tends to ask. Over the last 10 years, the following are the 14 most common basic questions I am asked about ...
    Continue Reading
     
  • Ads

  • Most Common VA Disabilities Claimed for Compensation:   

    tinnitus-005.pngptsd-005.pnglumbosacral-005.pngscars-005.pnglimitation-flexion-knee-005.pngdiabetes-005.pnglimitation-motion-ankle-005.pngparalysis-005.pngdegenerative-arthitis-spine-005.pngtbi-traumatic-brain-injury-005.png

  • Advertisemnt

  • Advertisemnt

  • Ads

  • Can a 100 percent Disabled Veteran Work and Earn an Income?

    employment 2.jpeg

    You’ve just been rated 100% disabled by the Veterans Affairs. After the excitement of finally having the rating you deserve wears off, you start asking questions. One of the first questions that you might ask is this: It’s a legitimate question – rare is the Veteran that finds themselves sitting on the couch eating bon-bons … Continue reading

Sponsored Ads

  • Searches Community Forums, Blog and more

  • Donation Box

    Please donate to support the community.
    We appreciate all donations!
  • 0
Sign in to follow this  
kathyred

What Is The Issue To Be Decided

Question

I wanted to pose this question to all you wonderful people out there.

First a little back ground

My husband initially filed a claim for chronic asthma in Dec. 2005 after being denied for emphysema in1994.

6/06/2006 RATING DECISION the medical description was Chronic Asthma.

2/03/2007 SOC ISSUE was service connection of lung disorder. In the reasons and bases it states “Your report of asthma in service is not a medical finding. Your bronchitis in service was acute. You do not now have chronic bronchitis. Based on the VA examiner’s finding, service connection for a lung disorder is not shown….”

05/17/07 Filed VA-9 On his VA9 he checked the box that states “I Want To Appeal All Of The Issues Listed On The Statement Of The Case And Any Supplemental Statements Of The Case That My Local Va Office Sent To Me.”

6/04/2007 SSOC ISSUE was service connection of lung disorder. In the reasons and bases it states “…the evidence does not show that the veteran’s current lung condition, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was incurred in or aggravated by his military service…”

10/12/2007 SSOC ISSUE was service connection of lung disorder. In the reasons and bases it states “…chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is not caused by or a result of the veteran’s military service….no formal diagnosis of asthma by a medical care provider…..no documentation found of a diagnosis or treatment of bronchitis…..”

May 2009 The case was remanded to the AMC for developing additional evidence on “...you appeal for a respiratory disability, to include as due to asbestos exposure.”

9/29/2009 SSOC from AMC ISSUE Service connection for a respiratory disability, to include as due to asbestos exposure. In Reasons and bases “….we are unable to establish service connection for a respiratory disability. For the most part, the evidence of record indicates your emphysema is not related to your period of military service.”

Jan 2011 In the denial from the BVA the Board “defines the current issue on appeal as entitlement to service connection for respiratory disability other than COPD/emphysema to include chronic asthma and pulmonary disease due to asbestos exposure.” And goes on to state “….In this regard, to the extent that the clinical evidence indicates that the Veteran’s COPD/emphysema was aggravated by his alleged exposure to diesel exhaust fumes in service, the Veteran is hereby advised at this juncture that as service connection was previously denied in a prior final rating decision and as he has expressly stated that he present claim on appeal is for VA compensation for a respiratory disability other than COPD/emphysema, he may wish to pursue a claim for new and material evidence and apply to reopen his COPD/emphysema claim, per 38 CFR 3.156 (2010).”

The Va first referred to this claim when we filed the claim in Dec 2005 as Chronic Asthma and then in Feb 3 2007 on SOC referred to the claim as lung disorder. On 5/17/2007 we filed VA-9 and wanted to appeal all of the issues listed on the SOC and SSOC that were sent to me. Even the remand on 5/19/09 the Issue was entitlement to service connection for a respiratory disability, to include as due to asbestos exposure. The last time this claim was being referred to as Asthma was 2006 and now in 2011 on the BVA decision it was referred to as "respiratory disability other than COPD/emphysema to include chronic asthma and pulmonary disease due to asbestos exposure.”

The main question I have is when the VA started referring to this claim by names other than Chronic Asthma did that open a claim for all respiratory disabilities. Especially since this was done on the SOC prior to the VA-9 being filed?

Thanks for any help you can give me on this Issue.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

This is my take on this:

'Jan 2011 In the denial from the BVA the Board “defines the current issue on appeal as entitlement to service connection for respiratory disability other than COPD/emphysema to include chronic asthma and pulmonary disease due to asbestos exposure.”

I assume they denied COPD as related to asbestos exposure. Asbestos claims almost always need an IMO unless the issue is mesothelioma.

They will use any smoking history as well as any post service occupation to try to show the veteran's asbestos exposure was Not due to service for COPD claims unless there is significant evidence to the contrary (or a strong IMO)

And goes on to state “….In this regard, to the extent that the clinical evidence indicates that the Veteran’s COPD/emphysema was aggravated by his alleged exposure to diesel exhaust fumes in service, the Veteran is hereby advised at this juncture that as service connection was previously denied in a prior final rating decision and as he has expressly stated that he present claim on appeal is for VA compensation for a respiratory disability other than COPD/emphysema, he may wish to pursue a claim for new and material evidence and apply to reopen his COPD/emphysema claim, per 38 CFR 3.156 (2010).”

They are saying this claim is stronger- clinical evidence indicates potentially that diesel exposure aggravated his lung condition and since his present claim is

"for a respiratory disability other than COPD/emphysema" he should claim that as well as re-open the COPD /emphysema claim on the basis of the "alleged exposure to diesel exhaust fumes in service"

You asked:

"The main question I have is when the VA started referring to this claim by names other than Chronic Asthma did that open a claim for all respiratory disabilities. Especially since this was done on the SOC prior to the VA-9 being filed?"

I feel the answer is YES!

But the EED for any potential retro would be =- from what I see here- the date of actual claim for the specific disability(ies).

The BVA is saying that if he succeeds on a re opened claim- then his EED wold be that of the reopened claim.

It looks to me that he was locked into the asbestos claim and that was denied.

If he has significant evidence (I expect this will definitely take a strong IMO) that diesel fuel exposure caused a SC disability and/or aggravated ANY NSC condition he had (meaning the NSC COPD /emphysema) then in this way all disabilities could be considered in receiving a SC rating.

Does he have a vet rep to help him prepare a claim based on the statements of the BVA?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ad

I agree with Berta. What they are in essence doing is they are actually conceding (or, at least opening the door, albeit just a little) ".In this regard, to the extent that the clinical evidence indicates that the Veteran's COPD/emphysema was aggravated by his alleged exposure to diesel exhaust fumes in service" then " he may wish to pursue a claim for new and material evidence and apply to reopen his COPD/emphysema claim, per 38 CFR 3.156 (2010)."

In other words, they have let him know that the stronger of his claim(s) is the original COPD/EMPHYSEMA claim and that he should simply file to RE-open this claim, however, in the request to re-open I would make sure and referr to the request as a request to re-open for a "respiratory disorder" and let THEM figure it out......do not even attempt, at this stage, to diagnos his disability. They will most likely be scheduling a C&P exam (or at least I would think that they would), and you do not indicate if this has been done prior to this stage of the game and what the C&P outcome was vis a vis a diagnosis........................

and, if the C&P diagnosis IS emphysema then I believe that you have a good basis for claiming the earliest effective date as being the date of claim in 1994, but, don't hang you hat on it.

Edited by LarryJ

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Given the way the VA does(or doesn't) do things - - With potential retro going back to 1994. I'd sure consider a lawyer. There is a fair amount of money involved in retro, and, in my opinion, and personal experience, the VA will try to minimize things, even when and if they decide to award.

I agree with Berta. What they are in essence doing is they are actually conceding (or, at least opening the door, albeit just a little) ".In this regard, to the extent that the clinical evidence indicates that the Veteran's COPD/emphysema was aggravated by his alleged exposure to diesel exhaust fumes in service" then " he may wish to pursue a claim for new and material evidence and apply to reopen his COPD/emphysema claim, per 38 CFR 3.156 (2010)."

In other words, they have let him know that the stronger of his claim(s) is the original COPD/EMPHYSEMA claim and that he should simply file to RE-open this claim, however, in the request to re-open I would make sure and referr to the request as a request to re-open for a "respiratory disorder" and let THEM figure it out......do not even attempt, at this stage, to diagnos his disability. They will most likely be scheduling a C&P exam (or at least I would think that they would), and you do not indicate if this has been done prior to this stage of the game and what the C&P outcome was vis a vis a diagnosis........................

and, if the C&P diagnosis IS emphysema then I believe that you have a good basis for claiming the earliest effective date as being the date of claim in 1994, but, don't hang you hat on it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are talking about a decade of retro and their are legal questions I would hire a lawyer if I were going to go beyond basic VARO level appeals. The VA is apt to just deny the claim because they don't want to be the guy who makes an award of a couple of hundred thousand dollars. Even when they make gross errors the RO and even BVA don't want to be the ones to hand over multithousand dollar awards. When and if you get to the Court of Vet appeals you want the product that goes to the court to be perfected long before it gets there. Your claim is stirring debate here at Hadit,so you can imagine how the people at the VA see it. The first thing they want to do is CYA for a big award. From experience I can tell you nobody wants to grant huge awards. I can imagine some VA boss saying "I don't care if it is a good claim. I am not paying some damn vet 200,000 bucks on my watch".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you are talking about a decade of retro and their are legal questions I would hire a lawyer if I were going to go beyond basic VARO level appeals. The VA is apt to just deny the claim because they don't want to be the guy who makes an award of a couple of hundred thousand dollars. Even when they make gross errors the RO and even BVA don't want to be the ones to hand over multithousand dollar awards. When and if you get to the Court of Vet appeals you want the product that goes to the court to be perfected long before it gets there. Your claim is stirring debate here at Hadit,so you can imagine how the people at the VA see it. The first thing they want to do is CYA for a big award. From experience I can tell you nobody wants to grant huge awards. I can imagine some VA boss saying "I don't care if it is a good claim. I am not paying some damn vet 200,000 bucks on my watch".

BINGO!

darned good advice

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  

  • Ads

  • Ad

  • Latest News
  • Our picks

    • OK so I had pancreatectomy in 2003 due to an impacted goldstone 2/3 of my  Pancreas was removed I am type one diabetes with very large scars continued diarrhea stomach problems Constant back and shoulder pain I recently received a Nexus letter from my  endocrinologist related to my service in the gulf war.  Any suggestions or advice from anyone
    • I would like to meet other Hadit members who live in Michigan.  We have at least two major VA Hospitals (Battle Creek, Ann Arbor).  Or maybe you go to the the John Dingell in Detroit.  

      I like Ann Arbor.  I like the fact that most of the doctors there are also at the UM Hospital.  I don't like how uickly they seem to turn over though.  
        • Like
      • 5 replies
    • Really?
      I am confused.  A few days ago I spoke to a person at a VARO who said if I die from something other than service-connected my husband gets zero, zilch, squat.  Hmmmmmm, it seems the rules change willy-nilly...I have been rated 100% P & T for over 10 years, MS is static, and I am 56 years of age.

      Can a fellow Veteran shed a light on this?

      Thank you.
        • Haha
      • 15 replies
    • Fund raising for HadIt.com
      The site is supported through ads and ad free subscriptions, we are also asking for any support you would like to send our way. You can give a $1 or more it all helps. Keep in mind though that it is NOT tax deductible and we are NOT a non profit. As the site grows so do the costs and ads and subscription do not always keep pace with the costs. Any help is appreciated, but not required.
      • 11 replies
    • Carol Ozanecki- Blue Water vet Advocate called me with this news:

      https://www.stripes.com/news/lawmakers-launch-new-effort-to-provide-agent-orange-coverage-for-blue-water-navy-vets-1.525395

      Also there is a article in Pop Culture she sent to me----mentionig Blue Water vets buy I felt it was too political to post here. You can google it if you want to read it.

       

       
      • 10 replies
×

Important Information

{terms] and Guidelines