Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Recently Sc'd : Could There Be Retro Pay?

Rate this question


autumn

Question

i was recently diagnosed with ms and service connected for it.

C&P exams have returned this disease started on active duty in 1986 and that i've had it since then, along with spinal disease, and mood-disorder(secondary to MS), for all these years. though they never admitted to this until recently. it was always something else : you folks know the drill.

is it going to be an up hill battle for retro or am i actually legally qualified for retro pay? the whole issue is confusing to me although i have the pva helping me. often times i just can't get a clear picture of this. and with years of mis-diagnoses and mis-med-treatments, i don't know who to trust in this matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

i was recently diagnosed with ms and service connected for it.

C&P exams have returned this disease started on active duty in 1986 and that i've had it since then, along with spinal disease, and mood-disorder(secondary to MS), for all these years. though they never admitted to this until recently. it was always something else : you folks know the drill.

is it going to be an up hill battle for retro or am i actually legally qualified for retro pay? the whole issue is confusing to me although i have the pva helping me. often times i just can't get a clear picture of this. and with years of mis-diagnoses and mis-med-treatments, i don't know who to trust in this matter.

autum,

When did you get SC for MS and at what percentage ?

I do not see retro going back to 1986, unless the grant for SC hinged on lost or misplaced

SMR'STR's, or the other way for retro back to 1986 would be Clear and Unmistakable Error (CUE).

A CUE claim can only consider the evidence and rating criteria of record at the time the prior decision was made.

It can not correct a poor decision that was made and can not involve a mis-diagnosis or a change in diagnosis.

CUE's can only consider legal errors.

If you can, post the Reasons and Bases Section of the Rating Decision

that granted your SC for MS. Do Not post personal info like your name, claim number, etc...

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

autum,

When did you get SC for MS and at what percentage ?

I do not see retro going back to 1986, unless the grant for SC hinged on lost or misplaced

SMR'STR's, or the other way for retro back to 1986 would be Clear and Unmistakable Error (CUE).

A CUE claim can only consider the evidence and rating criteria of record at the time the prior decision was made.

It can not correct a poor decision that was made and can not involve a mis-diagnosis or a change in diagnosis.

CUE's can only consider legal errors.

If you can, post the Reasons and Bases Section of the Rating Decision

that granted your SC for MS. Do Not post personal info like your name, claim number, etc...

ok, i'll post this. hope this is what you were asking. i don't think i put any personal info here ...

[2010: 1st c&p to establish an actual diagnosis as no VA dr would diagnosis me for over 20 years]

upon review of the veteran service treatment records, which show positive csf with oligoclonal bands, consistent with multiple sclerosis, the patient does have a current confirmed diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. this did have its onset in the service as manifested by the positive csf, later confirmed by MRI studies. the CSF studies, MRI studies, and clinical posture are all consistent with a diagnosis of multiple sclerosis which is also the diagnosis of several non-VA neurologists.

[2010: several imo's]

they support a CUE and states so

[2010: decision letter 30% for ms]

you are granted service connection for multiple sclerosis because this has been established as directly related to military service your service treatment records show positive csf with oligoclonal bands consistent with ms. post service treatment records show consistency of complaint and symptom manifestation. [...more med fluff..]

[2011: 2nd c&p for secondary issues, though that wasn't done. they are being re-ordered]

i have reviewed the claim file and records extensively. a number of competent neurologists have examined this individual, and they have all concluded that the veteran does have MS. they all agree that the onset of the disorder was in the 1980's while the veteran was still on active duty. [...just med stuff about why he can't do secondary conditions...] this veteran suffers from this disease and has now for over 20 years, and it is chronic, relapsing, and over time, gradually progressive.

Edited by autumn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It'll probably depend on when you filed your claim, unless you were discharged for those symptoms. jmo

pr

i was discharged for spinal problems and with dep (secondary to chronic pain due to spinal problems)

the MEB(med eval baord) dismissed the MS tests as being false positive and dismissed a few other things that were clearly pos in my mil med records. which the va now agrees to.

so, as for symptoms, yeah, i had them then, and the records clearly shows it.

oh well, its all confusing as heck to me some days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

You could win back to whenever you first filed for the symptoms of MS. You only needed to show 10% of the symptoms, then, meaning you didn't need to have fully blown MS but only needed some symptoms pointing in that direction. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar w/the symptoms of MS. If the spine stuff is related to the MS then it would be possible to go back to the original claim date. If you had them then and the VA missed or ignored them you could have a CUE and be entitled to an EED. The VA won't generally go back further than the date you applied.

pr

i was discharged for spinal problems and with dep (secondary to chronic pain due to spinal problems)

the MEB(med eval baord) dismissed the MS tests as being false positive and dismissed a few other things that were clearly pos in my mil med records. which the va now agrees to.

so, as for symptoms, yeah, i had them then, and the records clearly shows it.

oh well, its all confusing as heck to me some days

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You could win back to whenever you first filed for the symptoms of MS. You only needed to show 10% of the symptoms, then, meaning you didn't need to have fully blown MS but only needed some symptoms pointing in that direction. Unfortunately, I'm not familiar w/the symptoms of MS. If the spine stuff is related to the MS then it would be possible to go back to the original claim date. If you had them then and the VA missed or ignored them you could have a CUE and be entitled to an EED. The VA won't generally go back further than the date you applied.

pr

ok, sorta understand. puzzling in that, how could one file a claim for something the navy and va said i didn't have when in fact i did have it, as they now agree to. i sure would have filed for it when discharged from the navy if i hadn't been told i didn't have it. they said i was depressed so file for that which i did. oh well, guess that is why they kept telling me i didn't have when in fact i did/do. LOL what a trip! thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use