Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Can Someone With More Brain Cells Than Me Read This?

Rate this question


JHawks

Question

Mr.. Hxxxx,

I have actually looked at your file and saw that it is being worked and actually in draft form. The individual that completed the draft simply added the chapter 35 contention (this is not an issue) if you qualify it simply means that they will award this additional benefit. I am only allowed to give you the information that is available and that is all. Some cases are being worked by our newest raters and has to go through a more experienced rater before the final decision is made. The newer rater just felt that Chapter 35 benefits may be appropriate. So, as I said be patient and wait for the rating. They are looking at the bilateral carpal tunnel--they just left off that it was secondary and the Chapter 35 is provisional.

Janice

70% SC Disabled Vet

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Mr.. Hxxxx,

I have actually looked at your file and saw that it is being worked and actually in draft form.

J - the above is good to see, it will be nice when it is finally completed and a decision is promulgated.

The individual that completed the draft simply added the chapter 35 contention (this is not an issue) if you qualify it simply means that they will award this additional benefit.

The newer rater just felt that Chapter 35 benefits may be appropriate.

So, as I said be patient and wait for the rating. They are looking at the bilateral carpal tunnel--they just left off that it was secondary and the Chapter 35 is provisional.

J - As I posted somewhere, if a claimant is 70 % or higher SC'd - VA is to infer additional benefits that the claimant MIGHT be eligible for,

things such as IU / Chapter 35, etc...

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Do you believe the rater is looking at 100% if they changed the contentions of my claim to include Chapter 35 as part of my claim?

I do believe they are at least considering either IU or 100% scheduler.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Carlie :-)

If they think that chapter 35 is an inferred issue (something to consider) then they are considering 100% rating, because Chapter 35 is granted to 100% scheduler P&T rated vets only.

But remember this doesn't mean you will get a 100% rating, just that the new rater has noticed that 100% is a possibility and therefore they have to note that chapter 35 would have to be considered too.

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I'm going to go out on a limb on this. One must be either 100% or TDIU to be considered for Chap 35, as it is a benefit of being P&T. In order to be P&T, and considered/inferred for Chap 35, you must be 100% or TDIU. I personnally feel there's a good chance the rating will be, at minimum, 100% or TDIU, and may or may not include P&T. That's just my guess!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

hawkfire27, Chapter 35 can't be an inferred issue until the claimant "is" rated 100% or TDIU. So, to me, the rating will be either 100% or TDIU. jmo

pr

I agree with Carlie :-)

If they think that chapter 35 is an inferred issue (something to consider) then they are considering 100% rating, because Chapter 35 is granted to 100% scheduler P&T rated vets only.

But remember this doesn't mean you will get a 100% rating, just that the new rater has noticed that 100% is a possibility and therefore they have to note that chapter 35 would have to be considered too.

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use