Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

I Guess I Won Something!

Rate this topic


Philip Rogers

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Phil

Why did it take them almost ten years to award "K"? How high did you have to go in the appeals process? I know "K" is less than $100 a month but ten years worth is OK. Your VA savings plan. Now you get "S" and what will be the next challange?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

carlie - it is probably the "k" award, based on the amount. The 100+60 shouldn't take long tho, cuz I brought the info WAC-Vet75 gave me, down to the RO, while they were working on my claim/CUE, for that. Shouldn't be long, unless they deny.

pr

pr,

I would agree it's most likely the "K" award.

I don't think the VBA has burnt up enough time yet (lol)

for it to be a decision on the 100 & 60, SMC yet.

Edited by Philip Rogers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

carlie - it is probably the "k" award, based on the amount. The 100+60 shouldn't take long tho, cuz I brought the info WAC-Vet75 gave me, down to the RO, while they were working on my claim/CUE, for that. Shouldn't be long, unless they deny.

pr

PR, just in case, concerning the 100% plus 60%, I'm making some records for my children AND Grandchildren... knowing how long the system works, all of us fighting for the 100% plus 60% may be LONG gone, if it goes through the whole system, RO-BVA-CAVC! :angry:

Old soldiers never die.... we just fight new wars!

Proud to have served, U.S. Army WAC

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

john999 - because my testosterone levels were low, they used a hypogonadism diagnosis to shoot down the "k" award. I got a "fair" but not great IMO, from my civilian urologist and submitted it, but kinda forgot about it since then, as I had a SMC case at the CAVC, I was more concerned about. I had been wondering what had happened to it and I guess that's what I just won. At least, the money is right, for that. Should know, tomorrow, for sure.

pr

Phil

Why did it take them almost ten years to award "K"? How high did you have to go in the appeals process? I know "K" is less than $100 a month but ten years worth is OK. Your VA savings plan. Now you get "S" and what will be the next challange?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Okay, finally received the decision letter and a SSOC dated two days later. They called a CUE on the ED and hypertension decisions and awarded the SMC "k" award retro to 2001. As for the 100+60 SMC "s" claim they still denied it, explaining that the additional 60% must be determined using the combined ratings chart. They also denied my 20 yr old claim for HB/A&A. It looks as tho I'll need to go to the BVA, on the 100+60 denial. Fun, fun, fun!!!

pr

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yippee, sounds like they had to go CUE themselves!!!!!!

I have been looking for this all week and just found it .It might help someone here if they have similar past denied SMC issue they want to file CUE claim on.

"M21-1, Part VI  March 18, 2003

Change 102

Erratum 

decision, and reasons and bases numbered item as the primary issue.  An example of such an issue statement might be "1.  Evaluation of psychotic disorder currently evaluated as 30 percent disabling; Competency to handle disbursement of funds."  Although each of the two issues would be separately justified within the same reasons and bases item, the sentences dedicated to the facts would be shared by both.  If the primary and inferred issues are each itemized in separate issue, decision, and reasons and bases paragraphs, discussion of a common fact-pattern may be confined to the reasons and bases of the primary issue. 

      a.  Special Monthly Compensation (SMC).  Consider entitlement to SMC as an issue in every case where there is a severe degree of disability involving the loss or loss of use of an extremity or sensory organ or any other functional loss providing entitlement to SMC.  If SMC is not granted, the reason must be indicated. 

      b.  Aid & Attendance or Housebound.  Whenever a single 100 percent evaluation is assigned in compensation or pension cases, consider entitlement to aid and attendance.  If aid and attendance is not payable, consider entitlement to housebound benefits.  In pension cases use rating code 19C in the rating conclusion when both aid and attendance and housebound benefits are denied. "

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use