Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Chapter 35 Dea Benefits.

Rate this question


hawkfire27

Question

SO here I sit, amazed at the letter I am looking at.

In June 2009 I applied for chapter 35 Education benefits for spouse. I was denied.

I sent in a NOD which was deniedd, and then sent in a FORM 9 Appeal with Travel Board hearing.

Well for the last two years I have been looking forward to a travel baord hearing date to be set. Everytime I call the VA they tell me there is an appeal and I just need to wait for the hearing date to be assigned. Well that's just fine right???

Wrong!

Apparently I never even needed to file an appeal. I just need to reapply for my education bebenfits.

My VSO at PVA Albuquerque just informed me that if I am denied, I can reapply, as the effective date is not the same for DEA education bebenfits as it is for compensation or pension. I t is the date of disability or the date of marriage which determines the effective date, so there is no need to appeal it.

It is also not treated like a compensation claim, or shouldn't be anyway.

So here I am with a letter from the Muskogee Education Office stating they are currently working on my claim, and all it took was a letter from PVA asking for reapplication.

Anyone else experienced this?

We are a Vietnam vet and vet's wife, we are not lawyers or VSO's we're just learning as we go.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Has your spouse applied?? It's their claim and she/he needs to apply, not you. Be sure it goes to the regional office that handles educational claims and will probably need to submit copies of marriage license, birth certificate, divorce papers(if any previous marriages), along w/copy of your award.

As for the date, for DEA benefits, it can be date of marriage, if marriage took place after the award of the P&T. You'll have to check the rules here otherwise, as they've been posted many times.

pr

SO here I sit, amazed at the letter I am looking at.

In June 2009 I applied for chapter 35 Education benefits for spouse. I was denied.

I sent in a NOD which was deniedd, and then sent in a FORM 9 Appeal with Travel Board hearing.

Well for the last two years I have been looking forward to a travel baord hearing date to be set. Everytime I call the VA they tell me there is an appeal and I just need to wait for the hearing date to be assigned. Well that's just fine right???

Wrong!

Apparently I never even needed to file an appeal. I just need to reapply for my education bebenfits.

My VSO at PVA Albuquerque just informed me that if I am denied, I can reapply, as the effective date is not the same for DEA education bebenfits as it is for compensation or pension. I t is the date of disability or the date of marriage which determines the effective date, so there is no need to appeal it.

It is also not treated like a compensation claim, or shouldn't be anyway.

So here I am with a letter from the Muskogee Education Office stating they are currently working on my claim, and all it took was a letter from PVA asking for reapplication.

Anyone else experienced this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure why you would want to do that. If your claim gets denied again then you have to file a NOD again and then ask for a hearing again and then wait again. Maybe I just don't understand what you are saying. I had been patiently waiting for my hearing when out of the blue i received a letter stating they had reversed their decision. I'm not sure that would have happened had I reapplied with a new claim.

Edited by crawsfire
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use