Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Wriisc

Rate this question


mpara

Question

Greetings all!

Has anyone out there been to the War Related Illness and Injury Study Center (WRIISC) that can share any information? I have a Vet who is seriously considering attending for Gulf War Illness related conditions and am trying to help gather as much information as possible. Her concerns include:

  1. What is the average duration of stay?
  2. How effective are they in educating and assisting Veterans dealing better with their illnesses?
  3. Has anyone had their service connected disability percentage adversely effected by participating?
  4. Are they actually acknowledging and dealing with conditions better than standard VA Primary Care physicians?
  5. Can a Veteran receive any compensation while attending to offset lost income while participating?
We would appreciate anyone out there who can answer any of the above or who may have any other insight or concern regarding participating in this program.

Thanks much

“We can't all be heroes, because somebody has to sit on the curb and applaud when they go by.” - Oklahoma's own Will Rogers

I personally don't mind doing the clapping - Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

My husband went to the WRIISC in DC several years ago. He stayed 2 nights. It was very positive in that they were very supportive and kind and treated him with respect. They did test he wouldn't have otherwise gotten at the time (brain scans & sleep tests) - the only down side, he did not come away with any new treatments - however, this was about 3 yrs ago . There is a LOT of new studies and info . I have been thinking about seeing if he could go back for a follow up. He was happy he went and would go anywhere there is any hope to help him feel better.

The sleep study ruled out sleep apnea - that info helped his Dr in diagnosing CFS, and supported his claim for CFS (he was finally granted by BVA - still waiting for rating)

They are not there to help your claim, but there is a good chance their findings can be used to support your claim. They are definitely not there to do anything that would adversly effect your claim. They stay out of claims - but again, good chance you will find information you can use to support your claim.

I do not think you can get compensation for time off work. But, the vets hospital sets up the dates and pays for the flight there. The WRIISC pays for the flight back. Meals while you are there are included. So there is not cost to you - except time off work.

3 years later, with all the new studies and reports from the IOM , Boston University etc... I would think they are even more educated and helpful than when my husband went. I know it was scary for him (and me) before he went, just not knowing what to expect and how you'll be treated. After going, he was very happy he went. Just to have someone acknowledge what you feel is real - that is huge, even if there aren't treatments yet. Again, they are very nice, respectful and and courteous., and he would go again if given the opportunity.

Hope this helps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks so much Vetwife for such a great response! Great information for sure.

“We can't all be heroes, because somebody has to sit on the curb and applaud when they go by.” - Oklahoma's own Will Rogers

I personally don't mind doing the clapping - Me

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use