Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Check In Hand!

Rate this topic


Chuck75

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Six figures, sweet!!!!!!!!!! Enjoy what you have left of life, now.

pr

The Eagle roosted on my mailbox today. Just long enough to deposit a six figure retro check.

Paperwork was supposedly generated at the VARO last week, and has yet to catch up.

The post office must have fired the pigeons, because it's less than one hundred miles as the "crow flies" to the VARO.

In the past, I've had VA letters from the RO that were dated up to five days before the postage machine stamp on the envelope.

Without the details - -

They may or may not have used the correct rate (married)

The effective date may be off a bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 15
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

The fat "white envelope" showed up today (Good Friday, yet!) With the gory details of a Nehmer award. Check was in hand yesterday.

There is a six day difference between the stamped date on the envelope and the date on the award letter. Only two days from the envelope date to "in hand",

and the award letter actually was sent from Florida, not my area VARO.

The VA actually did get the EDD correct (Shock!). The married rate was applied. The correct current monthly payment was calculated properly.

There was some question as to what date they would try to use, since the correct date was dependent upon a claim application (A.O. Presumptive condition) that did not specifically mention IHD or heart disease. Later the VA specifically denied heart disease when a specific claim was made. They also awarded hypertension as secondary to IHD, which was also previously denied. A C&P examiner tried to claim essential hypertension, and the treating doctors records and statements refuted the C&P examiner's opinion. (Board certified specialist vs. RN examiner)

This means that so far, the individual SC'd condition totals add up to 150%, 10%-20% short of what things actually should be, wonder why? <G>.

Now that the major hurdle has been overcome, it's time to concentrate on the rest. Scars were SC'd at 0%, and an SMC duty related condition previously denied was not mentioned.

The VA did include the information form 21-8760 concerning P&T, but not the "certification of total disability" and DD 1172. (Always something)

Phone call to the infamous 1000 number actually went through first try, and the VA rep supposedly generated the needed certification, etc. while I spoke.

Supposedly, I should see stuff early next week.

Hadit was a great help and provided encouragement during the persuit of this claim.

I wish I could say the same thing about the state veterans affairs reps, and the other service organizations. (DAV, VFW, etc.)

Their ineptness caused or contributed to denials and the need to eventually get a lawyer. Someone once said that the VA starts actually doing what they should have done when lawyers get involved. I found that to be the case. The VA actually did respond within the 21 day Nehmer limit after receipt of the last letter from the lawyer, which basically said that you have everything needed, quit screwing around. Actually, a case can be made that everything was in place over a year ago, and The VA was technically in contempt.

Six figures, sweet!!!!!!!!!! Enjoy what you have left of life, now.

pr

Edited by Chuck75
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

It always amazes me when I hear Veterans resent lawyers or paying them. If I could have gotten a lawyer I would gladly pay them what they charge just to take the worry off and to get it right. Funny how the lawyers get involved and the effective dates are right and things happen quicker.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I don't resent the fact that lawyers get paid. Under the "old rules" they had to work "Pro Bono" as the law required a payment that was a 'pittance". 10 or 20 dollars?

On the other hand, I deeply resent that the veteran in essence has to pay to correct the VA's mistakes. The time required is totally ridiculous, and from that alone, the VA should be paying reasonable costs, not the veteran.

The anger is such that if the VA had done what it should have done, and complied with the law, I would likely have quit at this point. But, since they forced me to fight, I will not consider the fight over until all reasonable "issues" are resolved in my favor. Collectively, they result in about a 10% difference in the monthly payment.

It always amazes me when I hear Veterans resent lawyers or paying them. If I could have gotten a lawyer I would gladly pay them what they charge just to take the worry off and to get it right. Funny how the lawyers get involved and the effective dates are right and things happen quicker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use