Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Writ Of Mandamus

Rate this question


grent

Question

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

Berta put it pretty well but Hadit has lots on Writ if you search for it.

Sorry about the spelling I am tired and not going to fix it.

Pete

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally in this case I would put some pressure on the lawyer before filing a Writ.

Also this s from a prior post I made to someone:

"Posted 25 August 2008 - 10:37 AM

BVA has put more people on their ombudsman staff-

their new number is 1-202-461-8069

and their email is still the same bvaoombudsman@va.gov "

It is possible that the BVA has the file by now.

When the VARO sends s a letter indicating potential transfer to the BVA, much can happen before the records get there.

I was thrilled when I was told my CUE was being transferred to the BVA last year.

But it wasn't transferred. It is being considered under Nehmer.

I Used IRIS to find that out as the VARO never told me it was not transferred.

Another thing-

Before a file gets physically sent to the BVA a I-8 must be prepared as well as a 646.

I am concerned here as to the 646 as this might be the hold up.

The 646 is a form used by your POA.

Is the DAV or some other org listed as POA on the potential transferred claim or is the lawyer?

Only one entity can hold POA on a claim and maybe this is the problem.

It took my former POA a lot of stalling the last time I had something to be transferred to the BVA.

I think the POA hemmed and hawwed deliberately -as the RO had made some critical errors regarding that claim and the POA knew it.It took months for the POA to prepare a 646 form to get it transferred.

Have you used IRIS for a status?

If you ask IRIS you should ask them to verify who is listed as holding your POA on the transfer to double check if that is correct.

If I were you ,before even attempting to file a Writ- I would first contact IRIS for a status of the claim (ask for email orsnail mail reply instead of phone call so you have documentation of what they state) and then contact the lawyer again by phone, email or snail mail.

My advise in the link hasn't changed- every administrative remedy must be attempted before asking for the writ.

Whether my writ helped in 1998 or not I don't know. My claim was resolved after I filed it.But it was resolved due to overwhelming evidence that VA had ignored for years.

The good part of filing it was I heard from many lawyers who got my contact info from the CAVC docket.

But they were not happy to learn this was a Mandamus writ yet after hearing a little about my claim, a few said said they would rep me at the court if the claim ever got there.

If your lawyer is unresponsive to you- time to dump them and get a better lawyer.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

http://www.va.gov/vaforms/va/pdf/VA646.pdf

If these are prepared by any rep or VSO on your POA, they put a copy of the filled out form in your POA file.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use