Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Help Understanding C&p Exam Results

Rate this question


cwk05

Question

I just received copies of my C&P Exam results in the mail and would like some feedback.

I currently have two pending claims. One for entitlement to service connection for anxiety disorder secondary to the psoriasis and the second for an increased rating for psoriasis currently evaluated at 30%.

1st Exam: Mental Disorder Exam Results

Diagnosis #1: Anxiety Disorder, with Generalized Anxiety, due to residuals of psoriasis.

Diagnosis #2: Mood disorder, with depressive features, due to residuals of psoriasis.

Medical History:

Patient has been in psychiatric treatment with a civilian psychiatrist since May 20, 2007. He has been treating him for OCD and GAD. In a letter dated 1/24/2011, his psychiatrist indicates that the patient's symptoms of anxiety and depression have increased due to his psoriasis which covers a large part of his body. "The itchiness causes sleep deprivation, which amplifies the frequency and severity of his anxiety and depression." He also reports that it affects his ability to teach because he loses concentration. He is irritable and unapproachable to his students. He is embarrassed about how he looks and does not participate in many activities. His psychiatrist also indicates the patient is having panic attacks at home and work. He is treating the patient with Zoloft 100 mg qd and Ativan 1mg prn.

In today's exam the patient reported that his doctor recently increased his Zoloft to 125 mg qd and increased his prn dos of Ativan to 2 mg. The patients psoriasis is affecting every aspect of his life from work, to family, to friends and leisure activities.

Symptoms:

Level I: Depressed Mood, Anxiety, Chronic sleep impairment.

(Not sure why he did not check off Panic Attacks that occur weekly or less often?)

Level II: Disturbances of motivation and mood.

Level III: None

Level IV: None

Other Symptoms:

The patient has symptoms of feeling self conscious about his psoriasis. He is embarrassed when his skin starts bleeding. Once he has a flare up he gets very anxious, irritable, and depressed.

Occupational and social impairment

Occupational and social impairment with occasional decrease in work efficiency and intermittent periods of inability to perform occupational tasks, although generally functioning satisfactorily, with normal routine behavior, self-care and conversation.

Current global assessment of functioning (GAF) score: 60

QUESTION #1:

Any idea what percentage I might qualify for, if any, based on this examination?

I've been seeing a private psychiatrist for 3 years regarding the anxiety created by the psoriasis. All records were sent in to RO. I see him once a month.

2nd Exam: Increase in service connection for psoriasis

  • Physical Exam: multiple scattered erethymatous scaling plaques and lesions on scalp, front and back of ears, right bridge of nose, all 4 extremities, both axilla, groin, buttocks, some nail involvement is noted as well in feet.
  • Exacerbation of skin symptoms has caused increased anxiety as his is a teacher and cannot conceal facial, ear lesions.
  • 10% of exposed head and neck and hands affected 50-60% of body affected.

My VA Derm. stated an increase to more than 50% over the last year.

QUESTION #2:

Would I qualify for an increase from 30% to 60%?

Thanks for any feedback

Edited by cwk05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

I can only base it off my own paperwork but from reading the forum the rating is based of your doc notes and the gaf number can change throughout the day. I recieved 50% with gaf scores of 50 and 55. But like I said I think they base things off of your doc notes, im guessing your in the 30% range but like I said you never know.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use