Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Tennsee Ftca Vets Get

Rate this question


Berta

Question

Tennesee vet's malpractice claims get a set back.

“Veterans suing the federal government after receiving colonoscopies with potentially contaminated equipment have been dealt a setback in federal court.

Todd J. Campbell, chief judge of the U.S. District Court in Nashville, dismissed one of the veterans’ cases in an order Friday. The judge said the lawsuit failed to meet the requirements for the filing of a medical malpractice lawsuit in Tennessee.

Mistakes with rigging or cleaning endoscopic equipment at Department of Veterans Affairs hospitals in Murfreesboro, Miami and Augusta, Ga., between 2003 and 2008 created the possibility that waste and bodily fluids from patients were transferred to subsequent patients receiving colonoscopies. Thousands of potentially exposed patients were informed of the mistakes in 2009.

After administrative claims for compensation were denied, more than half a dozen of the Middle Tennessee patients sued in federal court. While the other cases are still open, Campbell’s decision does not bode well for them. The specific facts of each case vary, but they make similar arguments — so similar that the cases were transferred away from the various judges they had been assigned to and grouped together in Campbell’s court for efficiency’s sake.

The case dismissed Friday was a $3 million suit filed by Thomas Anthony Mayo. Mayo claimed he contracted hepatitis from one of the colonoscopies that has led to chronic liver disease. Mayo said the situation has emotionally devastated him and his marriage has suffered greatly because he and his wife can no longer experience affection and intimacy.

Campbell ruled that Mayo’s claims fall within the scope of the Tennessee Medical Malpractice Act, which requires litigants to submit expert proof of their allegations. Mayo had argued in court filings that an expert opinion isn’t required to determine that the VA’s mistakes led to his infection.”

http://www.tennessean.com/article/20110512/NEWS/305120039/Veteran-s-colonoscopy-suit-runs-into-trouble-in-court

When the VA denies administrative FTCA claims the only recourse is to file in a federal court. These courts abide by state laws as to malpractice claims and it is unfortunate that apparently none of these vets did not have expert opinions (IMOs) that would have supported their claims and depended solely on VA's admission of contaminated equipment.

If they had strong supporting independent medical evidence from an experet in the filed of the disability they incurred that directly associated the disability with the contaminated equipment -they could have won at the administrative level of VA under FTCA.

A good rule of thumb- if you feel you have basis for FTCA and/or 1151 get an IMO right away to see if in fact negligence occurred.

If you file under FTCA get a lawyer.

I didnt have an IMO for my FTCA case. But I did have an expert opinion.Actually I had two.

From the VA itself when they could no longer ignore how probative my evidence was,their expert opinions concurred with my charges.

I dont know if these vets, if they obtain any supportive IMOs now, could even use them beyond perhaps a Section 1151 claim.They cant go back into the federal court and you cant file FTCA against VA twice for the same thing.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 1
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

1 answer to this question

Recommended Posts

Hello All Hope All Is Well.

I am in these stages of preperation and I can assure all of you not many private Medical Physicians wish to tangle with the VA or Gov. Reasons of litigation and prying into ones business Iam finding out.

Secondly i have just gone for an IMO Orthopedic prepared all material and format that is required by rebuttal or to refute a Compensation examination as inadequate.

The Physician did provide the necessary answer that the examiner did not even consider any of my concerns clearly however when it came to secondary concerns he did not respond to those issues.

And Clearly stated he did not wish to represent that or portray that he is a consultant for the VA.He also stated in his written responce that he NOTED this case was dismissed with PREJUDICE from a BVA DECISION.

and wish me luck with my difficult situation .

I scheduled an appointment with an Neurologist when she walked in and saw a Folder 2 inches thick with material she said Iam sorry I can not help you was not even in theexam room 5 min when I scheduled the appointment I was very clear as for the IMO and that I am Disabled Veteran.

In Closing I am getting one hell of an education and plenty of material for an auto biography of SERVICE US ARMY and VA RULES REGULATIONS AND THE LAW.

Iam workin with counsel as to what can be published so that the VA can piss in the wind and kiss my arse and those VETERANS whom have been mistreated for decades by the SYSTEM Clearly No accountability and transperancy by employees

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use