Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

What Does The Historic Va Court Ruling Mean For Veterans?

Rate this question


allan
  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Most of us are taking the "wait and see what the VA will do" attitude. If the past history is any indicator, I really do not see any real changes come from this. The VA goes its own way, and is famous for "snubbing" congress. Congressional inquiries rarely, if ever, produce any real results. If the VA can snub congress, why would they not likewise snub the courts?

Here is an example of Shinseki defying congress:

http://m.kitsapsun.com/news/2011/mar/12/tom-philpott-va-told-to-shape-caregiver-rules-to/

The VA is a train wreck, out of control. It will take a "new engineer" to have any hope of fixing the VA, as Shinseki is just along for the ride, and has no intention of following congress intent.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is ironic to note that a Judge has now ruled the VA has some serious problems. Now remember that Office of Inspector General has continously for over 12 years pointed out serious problems to Congress. At any House Veterans Affairs or Senate Veterans Affairs Hearings , the VA has always taken the stand of we are doing a fine job and we will change the areas you bring to our attention.

Ok fine, please tell me why is there over 1,000,000 claims backlogged? If the VA is taking the reports , the hearings and now another Judges rulings seriously then why is the Board of Veteran Appeals remanding ,,,,REMANDING OVER 80% of the Veterans Appeals back to the Regional Offices for mistakes , oversights or wrong decisions , illegal decisions by the Regional Offices which could have been done correctly the first time around.

It is the arrogance of the VA Regional Offices and the incredible incompetence of its personnel......... Howbeit that someone is giving the orders from alot higher than the Regional Managers ,,,,,,,,,,and I mean way higher, that some well meaning Regional Office personnel are made to be Whistle Blowers and can't do anything to change a corrupted wheel of government , sworn to take care of our Nations finest......its Veterans.

I think Bronco and Berta in the comments section, said it right ,,,,,They do not care about the Constitution ,,,,,or Due Process ... why should the VA care about the 38 CFR's , the M21's , or any other law that would award any Veteran his legal and well presented claim. Even if it is supported by sound medical evidence, the entire denial process ,,,is illegal but using up something most of us Veterans and their Widows and families do not have and that is TIME. Just look at the posters saying how long they have fought for their benefits. Years and Years......I know I am one fighting the gigantic wheel of VA Regional Office Abuse.

Remember,,,,,,, the old saying Delay Delay Delay ,,,,Deny Deny Deny ,,,,, until they Die , Die , Die. It is a proven tactic the VA Regional Offices know so well. The sad thing is that it works and the VA knows it works , so they are incredibly protective of it.

Forget whose in the White House. It is the Regional Offices that know how to fight anyone in the elected positions , whether it is Republican, or Democrats. The problem has not changed in the last half century. the VA is out of control and must eventually be totally dismantled and DESTROYED before any positive steps to help and I mean really help our Veterans can be started. The law says one thing , but the VA.......... they do whatever they want. As for me.......NEVER GIVE UP . God Bless, C.C.

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use