Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Is This An Early Effective Date Or Cue?

Rate this question


BasehorVet

Question

In late 10-2010 I submitted memorandum letter from the Department of the AF that was dated 8-2010, this letter was sent to me because I asked the AF Board to change military records to change my dd214 from JFL to JFL1, the AF Board allowed the request to go forward by saying that the even though the request was not timely filed (26 years after discharge) that in the interest of justice that they will overlook the time requirements.

Subject - Application for correction of military records.

Requested Action - The applicant is requesting to have his separation code of JFL changed so he can receive benefits that have been denied him by the Veterans Administration.

Facts - Applicant was referred to the informal physical evaluation board on 14 Dec 1984, for facet syndrome, lumbar spine, with low back pain. The IPEB found member fit for duty. Member requested a hearing with counsel at the formal physical evaluation board. On Jan 18 1985 the FPEB recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10%. The member non-curred with the FPEB and in his rebuttal to the Secretary of the Air Force (SAFPC) requested that he be given additional testing on his back. On March 25 1985 after review of the case file and proceedings from the FPEB the SAFPC recommended discharge with severance pay with a disability rating of 10%. Message was sent which established the discharge date of April 23 1985. Member served 3 years 11 months and 23 days of active service.

Discussion - Member is wishing to receive benefits from the Veterans Administration. Members dd214 form correctly reflects that member was discharged by reason of a physical disability and entitled to severance pay. JFL is the correct separation code for a person who was approved for a medical separation with severance pay.

I applied for my VA benefits while still on active duty so that I would be entitled the day after my discharge. 3 months later the VA denied my claim and now, since I have E-benefits, I see where they say that I was denied because their is no evidence in my SMR or elsewhere that I had any injury or disease during service. I have a Line of Duty determination that states my injury was caused by direct physical trauma to my lower spine while working as an aircraft mechanic in my files from the MEB investigation and over 2 years of physical therapy while on active duty. My final diagnosis was from the Chairman of the Orthopedics Department at Malcolm Grow Medical Center.

I have copies of my SMR's and Admin records that I made 26 years ago and every time in the past I tried to submit them, they would not accept them because they said that all the information was used to deny my original claim in 1985. I have been denied in 1985, 1990, 1999 and now 2009.

I am hoping that the following VA Memo regarding reconsideration of claims is in the works. VA Memo regarding reconsideration of claims

Current Diagnosis from VA med center - Major depression disorder due to uncontrollable pain (90 OXY's monthly), Chronic low back pain, MRI says herniated disc, 3 bulging discs, degenerative facet and spondylosis of entire lumbar spine. Just had C&P for hearing - hearing loss due to aircraft noise exposure, bilateral high range freq loss, bilateral tinnitus, seeing a ENT specialist this month for the discharge from ears, canal scarring and tympanic perforations first diagnosed on my initial hearing exam in 1985. Vertigo has been making my life even more miserable.

Basically, they claim that my records held no mention of a disability or injury incurred or aggravated during active duty upon discharge in 1985, Cue based on records available at the time they denied me 3 months after AF and DOD said 10% disabled and forced me out. Anyone would reasonably agree that I should have at least received a 10% rating for the disabilities based upon the appeal determination by the Secretary of the Air Force. I am not disputing medical opinion but only that I had a statutory benefit entitlement that was ignored in 1985.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 14
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • Lead Moderator

Not Well Grounded is a catch all phrase which means,

"Altho I never read your file as I am illiterate, I am denying you because I am the rater and I said so, and you are nothing but a peon Veteran."

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry about this next part, I guess I am just frustrated by the whole attitude from the VA that my SMR's were absent of any kind of injury or disease while on active duty and I need to get it off my chest from time to time. Frustration is not a word that sums up the 26 years of pain, relationship problems and employment interuptions. I didn't do anything wrong and I have never been able to claim that I am a service connected disabled Veteran because I am asked by others about how the VA has rated my disabilities and I feel the need to explain to them that the VA has not rated me because of errors. I choose not to bring it up my sacrifice because it is humiliating that the VA deems me to be a parasite trying to suck off the governments nipple.

Since all my SMR's were supposedly used in the original decision, the "well grounded" rule forbade me from being able to connect current health issues to those in the military. "That is not so easy since the VA depends on what "reasonable minds" would have concluded." I think any reasonable mind would have reviewed the following service medical records to figure out that they support the decision by the Secretary of the Air Force that I had a back disability:

01/27/82 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Hurt right hip fell on ice.

01/29/82 Emergency Care and Treatment Emergency room visit Patient C/O pain in right hip due to falling on ice. Patient has pain in lower back. Seen on 1-27-82 at emergency room and given valium. Low back strain.

01/29/82 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Low back pain

12/29/83 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Chronic lower back pain, with recent strain. No lifting over 10 lbs, no prolonged sitting or standing greater then 30 minutes.

01/27/84 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Low back pain. Narrowing of L4 L5.

01/30/84 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Consult back injury. Narrowing of L4 L5, Lumbar Syndrome, and evaluation for corset fitting.

01/30/84 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Lumbar Strain, no lifting over 10 lbs, no prolonged sitting or standing greater then 30 minutes.

01/31/84 Consultation Sheet Summary of Physical Therapy Clinic. Lumbar Syndrome, centered lower back pain - clicking noted. Tender LS region. ?Spondylolisthesis

02/17/84 Health Care Record Summary of Physical Therapy Clinic. Lower back pain, Lumbar Syndrome and renew profile.

02/17/84 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Lumbar Strain, no lifting over 10 lbs, no prolonged sitting or standing greater then 30 minutes.

03/12/84 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Lumbar Syndrome, no lifting over 10 lbs, no prolonged sitting or standing greater then 30 minutes.

03/22/84 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Bilateral Spondylolisis L5. No stooping or lifting over 15 lbs.

03/24/84 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit PARs defect L5 Slip, Bilateral Spondylolisis, lower spine, chronic lower back strain. Ultra sound therapy recommended.

03/29/84 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Lower back pain, needs permanent profile. Spondylolysis L5 Bilateral.

05/12/84 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Renew profile, lower back pain. AF Form 422 completed.

06/06/84 Consultation Sheet Summary of Doctor visit Lower back pain, After he hears "pop" pain is relieved.

06/06/84 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Facet Syndrome (No clear evidence of spondylitisthesis. Avoid lifting more then 20 lbs, no pushing or pulling, no climbing.

06/12/84 Health Care Record Summary of Doctor visit Permanent Profile consult, refer to ortho Malcolm Grow Medical Center

06/12/84 Physical Profile Serial Report Physical Profile Facet Syndrome (No clear evidence of spondylitisthesis. Avoid lifting more then 20 lbs, no pushing or pulling, no climbing. No aerobics.

07/19/84 Narrative Summary Cross Training of xxxxxx. Patient presents with most likely symptom of FACET Syndrome with myefacial chronic pain pattern. Cross training is recommended to career field in which the straining, pulling and pushing will be avoided. Should wear a lumbosacral corset to support his lower back and avoid types of exercise and past time activities which will include no straining of the lumbar spine. Patient had a series of low back x-rays. Came with a diagnosis of Spondylolysis, on examination of x-rays there is no clear evidence of spondylectic defect. Patient does have a suggestion of a partial defect on pars of the L5 level but there is no clear defect. Facets are all normal and disc spaces are normal without any signs of degenerative disc disease.

08/02/84 Report of Medical History MEB Medical History Report Hearing loss, broken bones, recurrent back pain, wear brace for back support.

10/11/84 Medical Board Report Summary Statement Facet Syndrome, lumbar spine. 24 year old male has facet syndrome which runs in intermittent course where he has discomfort for hours to days to weeks after a lifting or twisting mishap. Originally thoughts were given to cross training however patient is planning to separate from AF in April 1985. Not unfitting.

10/17/84 Line of Duty Determination Finding injury occurred in the line of duty

10/17/84 Line of Duty Determination Line of Duty Determination Low back strain, 1-27-82, approx 2200 hours patient was pulling liquid oxygen cart on the flight line when the listed injury happened.

01/18/85 Findings of PEB Disposition of PEB Facet Syndrome, lumbar spine, with low back pain. Is unfitting, degree of impairment is permanent, 10 percent rating. Hearing loss, minimal, row A column A not unfitting, impairment is permanent 0 percent rating. Member is unfit because of physical disability.

Edited by BasehorVet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use