Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Confused, Ticked Off, Etc.... Intro

Rate this question


wdroberson

Question

  • Answers 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

MMPI

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Multiphasic_Personality_Inventory

jmo... I would fear that in the wrong hands at VAMC or VARO, the results of such a test could be used against a vet with PTSD. We have seen too many misdiagnosed issues connected with PTSD since PTSD first appeared in the The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) circa 1980. The MMPI found it's origins in the 1940s.

Again, I am not that familiar with the revised MMPI, and I can understand how it can weed out the fakers, however, I am trying to understand how it could single out PTSD from the rest of the many MH disorders?

Still looking for a connection. Maybe..

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027151

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Still looking for a connection. Maybe..

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10027151

The trail has led me to...

The Keane PTSD Scale

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8827664

P.S. all this seems so dated???

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Psychometric testing is not always 100%. The people answering the questions can become confused by the test and the surroundings. However, the test are graded with more objective criteria than the alternative which is relying on doctors who do not even describe the questions or criteria they use to make a diagnosis.

I have read so many case studies that involve very superficial reporting by shrinks making disgnoses that I belive that psychometric testing is the only way for the field of psychiatry to have any chance of improving upon the diagnostic process. I have sucessfully obtained opinions rebutting reports written by C&P examiners who did not rely on psychometric testing and who wrote reports riddled with vague criteria and factual errors clearly exposing that they did not even read the records.

Just my somewhat educated opinion.

Hoppy

100% for Angioedema with secondary conditions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Psychometric testing is not always 100%. The people answering the questions can become confused by the test and the surroundings. However, the test are graded with more objective criteria than the alternative which is relying on doctors who do not even describe the questions or criteria they use to make a diagnosis.

I have read so many case studies that involve very superficial reporting by shrinks making disgnoses that I belive that psychometric testing is the only way for the field of psychiatry to have any chance of improving upon the diagnostic process. I have sucessfully obtained opinions rebutting reports written by C&P examiners who did not rely on psychometric testing and who wrote reports riddled with vague criteria and factual errors clearly exposing that they did not even read the records.

Just my somewhat educated opinion.

Thanks for the insight, Hoppy.

C.B.

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I can't understand why the VA does not give every vet they think has an emotional problem the MMPI except they are cheap bastards. The MMPI is the Gold Standard psychological test. How can a shrink tell you have PTSD with a 15 minute exam?

Thanks, John. I now better understand what you are saying.

Good Luck, William,

Bob

Edited by Commander Bob

"it shall be remembered"...

"We few"

"We happy few"

************************

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They need to be able to link your symptoms of re-experiencing to the stressor you listed on your stressor letter. The stressor needs to be allowed by the VA before they will schedule an initial C&P for PTSD. Get a copy of the C&P and make sure it says it was an "initial PTSD exam". Sometimes they schedule a mental health exam excluding PTSD. It will say what type of exam it was right on top of the report.

Edited by wdroberson
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use