Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Fiduciary Adjustment

Rate this question


Sidney56

Question

I just checked ebenefits to see if they were doing anything with my dependency

claim, and as usual everything is still in the development stage. Now this is

even though I submitted the paper work going on 2 months ago, after they kept

asking for documentation on my marriage and son's dependency about 5 times. Last

time I sent the information by my VSO, fax and certified mail.

I also saw that "Fiduciary Adjustment" had been added to claims in the development

stage. Sent in a 4138 disputing the proposal of incompetence and asking for my wife

to be appointed if one was deemed necessary. Sent this in about 2 months ago also.

Still have not heard anything concerning it.

What is this Fiduciary Adjustment crap? Seems like they are up to their old tricks

of assigning a fiduciary without any notification or interview.

Also, if my wife is appointed as my fiduciary, what restrictions are imposed on how

we spend my OWN money?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

There are two questions here that you need to answer:

1) Should you "lawyer up"? While almost no one wants to pay lawyer fees, you need to understand there is a real possibility that you can hire a lawyer and not have to pay. There are at least two circumstances when you get a lawyer and it costs you zero...one is the lawyer represents you pro bono, and the second is that you win your case and the judge awards your lawyer fees to be paid by the VA. (This can happen through EAJA..Equal Access to Justice ACT).

2) If you should lawyer up, when is the best time to do so. I think if you do decide that the risks of "not hiring a lawyer" are greater than the fees you would have to pay, then the best time is "the earlier the better". Your lawyer may have to try to "undo" mistakes you make, and he may not always be able to do that.

I think, having read some things about the VA and fiduciary fraud, that it would be a good time, at a minimum, to see if you can find a "pro bono" lawyer.

I got a letter from a lawyer wanting to take my case and said the fees will be paid by EAJA.

Thanks broncovet for your input. You make some very valid points. I was actually pondering those points with my

wife and decided to come back online to see if there were any more responses and here you are stating those exact

questions that we were discussing.

I was waiting to ask Jim Strickland if I should go ahead and get a lawyer now or later. He told me that he had

a lawyer if I needed one. I'm not sure if it is "pro bono" or not. I would appreciate it if you would elaborate

on the EAJA a little more and I could speak with Mr. Strickland on the subject.

Does this lawyer that contacted you practice in a certain region?

I will be taking my NOD to the VARO tomorrow as suggested by Mr. Strickland. Whom do I give it to? Should I find

the American Legion VSO(POA) and have him/her deliver it or what? I have read here somewhere that I should get a

time stamp or something validating receipt of documents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

IMHO, a fiduciary case is way, way, beyond any VSO or "free advisor". I dont think you can possibly underestimate the devestating financial effect of a bad fiduciary would have on your family, and this is not something I would leave to either "chance" or even a lawyer with less than significant experience with VA law. I would go with a pro, and I doubt that you would regret it. At a very minimum, you can almost always discuss your issue with a VA attorney, and, even if you decide not to enlist his or her services, they will often point you in the right direction.

Frankly, I would highly consider Katrina Eagle, Bergman and Moore, Carpenter (Topeka Kansas), or Doug Rosinski first. These are all highly regarded VA law experienced attorneys that have won significant benefits for their (Veteran) clients.

You can even do your homework and do a search, at the CAVC website, and type in an attorneys name and find out how he has done with other Vets.

You may also have good luck with some of the "national" law firms who do pro bono work for Vets. You see, a large well known law firm is NOT going to want one of their attorney's on staff to do pro bono work, and then say...ok we represented you and you lost..now have a nice day...NO! Those law firms have BIG EGO's and would not want their good name attached and associated with failure! Those big name law firms have excellent research teams and software to "dig out" those loopholes and exploit them to the max.

While I am not an expert at all, I have read enough about this issue to know this is not childs play! The VA has been burned and burned badly, and those VA employee lawyers want revenge and would love to take a case to "weaken" or even reverse Freeman, so you need a "heavy hammer" to counter the VA huge resources...some 400 or so lawyers.

Do not even think of showing up at a gunfight with the VA with a knife or any thing less than HEAVY artillery...such as a very experienced, big name law firm in the category of those I mentioned. You need every advantage you can muster, so the sooner a lawyer enters your case, the more likely you are to have a positive outcome. It is high time to call in the "heavy hitters" to help you. The VA has made their position known: They plan on taking advantage of every Vet and family they can to the max on the issue of fiduciary.....that fishy smell coming from the fiduciary department at the VA is NOT dinner!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the seriousness of the matter broncovet. Believe me I do! A bad decision

would actually ruin my family.

I still need to get this NOD in ASAP though, correct. I see the ad for Bergman and Moore.

Is this how I contact them. I'm not sure if I have the time to seek council before they

make a decision.

It seems that this is a never ending battle. I thought after all the years I had won, but

now I see it was just a battle in a huge war.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sydney, I strongly recommend that you follow Mr. Strickland's advice to the letter. I am almost certain that the attorney he has in mind is Katrina Eagle. She argued/won the FREEMAN case. Discuss having an attorney with Mr. Strickland right away.

Your immediate concern is to get the appeal of the incompetency determination formally submitted to, and receipt acknowledged by, the VA. You need only say that (1)You disagree with the incompetency determination; (2) You want a hearing before any action is taken including the appointment of a fiduciary; (3) You want payments of your disability compensation to continue unaltered and uninterrupted. You really don't need, or want, to say anything else.

Make copies of your disagreement and attachments and take them to your VARO. Ask them to date/time stamped a copy for your records. I have heard of some veterans getting some static about getting a date/time stamped copy, but if you politely hold your ground and you should be fine. You really want to get this done right away! As many of us have learned, it is much less time consuming and successful to influence a decision before it is made than it is to appeal an already made adverse decision. Try to stay a couple of steps ahead of them.

Good Luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Lead Moderator

If you are at or near the deadline for filing a NOD BY all means do so! You can make it a generic NOD and dont have to give your reasons, something like this:

I disagree with the decision dated June 1, 2011 on ALL issues, and plan to contest the result with a hearing (DRO, BVA, etc). I further disagree with any possible deemed denials.

Then sign your name. Your attorney (or other representative) can explain your disagreement in detail, but the timeliness is critical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • alexpainter earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Lebro earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • catyvaz1 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      First Post
    • AFguy1999 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use