Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Need Help (Berta)

Rate this question


Didto_69

Question

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Yes Berta i have a rep. from American Legion they are preparing a written argument in support. you know how that is. we should not have to doc. shop for a medical opined.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree and feel it is grossly unfair that many vets have to spend money for IMOs just to overcome some lousy C & P exam.

The C & P docs leave out or overlook so much it makes me wonder how good their medical skills are when they treat VA patients.

Broncovet -=not a genius -just a careful reader and well seasoned claimant myself.

I had a vet here once who was really ticked off (local vet) and threw his IMO on my table and said I paid 2 thousand for that crap!

I read it carefully -it totally supported his claim.

I think the claims process can become so emotional that we have a hard time interpreting stuff the VA states.I myself have always had a blind side regarding my claims.I don't know why I missed stuff when I filed them.

I missed adding HBP due to IHD to my AO claim.Then I figured VA will catch it and rate it anyhow.Plenty to support it in the stack.

Then I realized that would be too much to expect.

One of these days I will get the decision on that claim. They said it was ready to rate as of April 16th 2011.

The Nehmer claims seem to be going slow lately.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree Berta..., as you know my claim has been there for almost 2 years and after the decision they gave me in July I totally agree with you. I just hope now with all of the new info they get it right. According to the 800 number my claim is at the raters as of August 23rd. We will see how long this takes now.

Coachchas

Berta...

I would like to know where you got your "genuis" license, because I would like one, too. It is incredible that you got that aggravation stuff out of that.

While my 2 cents wont mean much, I would add that AMC is:

1) mostly operated by the RO

2) is the best example of why they call the VA a "bureaucratic mess"

3) Is a "black hole" where Veterans claims go in but cant escape, similar to a "roach motel".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing I have always done when sending them additional evidence ( I hardly ever used a 21-4138 but started to use it as cover sheet) is to list the evidence enclosed with a brief description of it.

I always use colored yard sale stickers and denote it as Exhibit A, B , C etc.in the list and make sure each piece f evidence enclosed is marked the same way and then I always total the enclosures.

I get lots of address stickers from some orgs I belong to or donate to and put one on every page I send along with my C file number on every page.

In the cover letter I try to briefly explain the claim in the simplest way I can ,since it has already been filed, telling them how the enclosed evidence warrants an award.

I make sure the strongest evidence is listed first.

I have some med recs here that have been copied so many times that they show Exhibit numbers in many places on them.

Often a med rec that might have prompted one award becomes significant again for an additional award somewhere down the road.

I have an ER Certificate for example dated in 1988 for my husband who had collapsed on the job (he worked at VA) and was rushed to the ER) that helped me succeed in FTCA, 1151, direct SC death, is part of my CUE claims, and is now the initial piece of evidence on my evidence list I sent for my pending AO IHD death claim.

BTW-I think my genius license expired years ago Broncovet!

Although I successfully proved malpractice to the VA, there was a edical entry I didn't understand and overlooked as to it's significance.

Also the autopsy which I felt I understood held a word I didnt look up because I thought I understood it.

Then my daughter in the Mil at the time insisted years after the FTCA that I re open the claim!

I didn't even want to think about doing that.

She ecen mentioned it again whenever she got home on leave and finally I sat down and reviewed the med recs again.

She was right. There was an additional misdiagnosis and it was for DMII.

I re opened the claim and it succeeded last year.

It took me about 8-9 months to find the doctor who made the entry I didnt understand.(He gave me a brief IMO)He had left VA for private practice.

And it took me mere minutes to look up the medical word in the autopsy I had failed to look up before and Bingo- that single word completely supported my re opened claim!

We cannot overlook ANYTHING! The VA does that enough as it is!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Dave119 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ShrekTheTank went up a rank
      Contributor
    • kidva went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use