Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Summary From Primary Care Dr.

Rate this question


walt

Question

Good Morning ,everyone,and thank you again,

I had asked my primary care Dr. to do this and she refused saying what the reply shows My intentions are to include this communication with her in more evidence I am sending in support of my claim. Should I? Or should I contact her again and point out that the cfr says she MUST? Or should I not use it at all?.

my claim was in decision on 3 Nov.and was sent back to developement on 8 Nov.I have called 1000 number several times and seems as who I talk to as to answer I get.last one said it read.........Request for mental exam with medical opinion for claim of anxiety. Please furnish opinion whether veterans curent anxiety is related to anxiety condition while in service.They say sent to va medical center.They then ask for the as likely as not and all the other terms on several more conditions I have claimed.The person I talked with at 1000 number yesterday mentioned it going to Richmond Va medical center.I told him I had never been to Richmond.My claim is being worked at Louisville Ky and I go to Murfreesboro Tn for VA care. I live in Scottsville Ky.65 milis to Murfreesboro and 100 miles to Louisville.They say I am not going to have to have another c and p exam.Problem is I can not determine who they are asking all this of.The man yesterday at 1000 number said my primary care Dr....I am assuming it is the c and p Dr. at Nashville where I had my exam.but I called them and the lady there said they were done with my exam and had sent the results to Louisville RO.

As I have stated before I have an IMO from a local phy asst on the chronic anxiety and LBP and she is getting the family Dr. to write one. I am also getting one from an RN who is a personal friend of about !5 years and is very familiar with the chronic anxiety.I have a" buddy"letter from in service that has written a very good letter and I have submitted it already..Then too, I have an appointment with a phychiatrist on 6 Dec. for an IMO on the chronic anxiety.I have avery good letter from a Dr.That works at a pain clinic in Fl. He and I were stationed together as enlisted OR techs . He went on to medical school after.discharge in 1974.The have his listed twice. once as letter from john doe and again as statement from Dr. John Doe III Md. I do not understand why twice unless maybe they are sort of considering his an IMO also.I also have several buddy letters concerning the chronic anxiety and LBP As allways thank all of you very much.Hoppy I will message you later today.I wish all of you and your family a happy and safe thanksgiving.Your advice ,comments ,suggestions please .Walt

Walter A. Brazelton SR.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 7
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Hello Walt,

I hope you try and just let the VA do their thing without trying to pressure them. It kinda hurt me when I tried that approach of forcing evidence and reports down their throat. For example the Neurology dept wrote back to tell my PCP that he should try to determine what the etiology was for the Peripheral Neuropathy even when they had seen the AO reports from the post. I even called the Neurologist that sent it and faxed him the reports and his dept clerk hit the ceiling. It was like don't confuse me with the facts , my mind is already made up. It took me 3 more years of testing and meeting with doctors that finally saw the evidence and wrote favorable reports on my behalf , including an Ischemic Heart Disease IHD Disability Benefits Questionaire VA Form 21-0960A-1. My Podiatrist after reviewing records and environmental reports even wrote a favorable opinion using the 'as least as likely as not' statement linking the PN to AO/Herbicide.

My point here is , that I just quit being so Gung Ho and pushy with all the test , evidence and kinda did the force feeding with a baby spoon rather than with a pitch fork. And of course you always run into a doctor that is just not interested in anything to help you and will even write false statements to try and derail the Veteran. Being patient and choosing your battles , when to set evidence into play and lead him or her along with what you have and letting the doctors connect the dots on their own for you. I am still having problems with some but others have tried to help and have. So I just have to let the RO examine the evidence and then maybe go forward with the C and P exams. Then maybe from that with some needed decisions and then to the BVA.

Like John said spending money and getting IMOs is probably going to be needed and I have done that too. If you can get both VA doctors and IMOs helping you with connecting the dots exams and IMOs then that is even better. You sometimes have to counter with a hostile nexus from a VA doctor with one that will nullify it by another VA doctor or and IMO to trump their problemactic Doctor. That includes the weaker statements the VA doctors gave you and how to best combat them.

Anway please hang in there and be patient. The road is long and sticky but you have so many that have gone on without our help before us and we glean from those who have been victorious. Wishing you and your family a Happy Thanksgiving and above all....NEVER GIVE UP. God Bless, C.C.

Edited by Capt.Contaminate
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use