Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Ao Nehmer Award Letter

Rate this question


Susan

Question

The letter arrived today. I posted in the Success forum because I just had to do that. Finally!! I am very happy with the win, but I feel that the retro is at least one third of what it should be. When I reread the letter I saw that it was "estimated amounts". I guess there could be more than the estimate. Also there is no mention of the funeral and burial benefit and I had submitted that information. There were papers and a pamphlet about DEA education benefits. One paper advised to check with the County VSO for taxes and other benefits. I will be sending the benefit info to NVLSP so that they can verify correct amounts. I have one year to disagree if anything is wrong. Since 1993 they awarded 30% for all years for Don except the year plus one or two months recuperation after bypass surgery. That year was rated at 100%. The one year was held out on DIC because for some reason the date shows that I applied in 2001 which is wrong because I filed in 2000. That date is questionable and looks to be a whited out zero to "create" a number one from a zero. And as expectted DIC ended in June of 2007 since I remarried in July of 2007. Once my divorce is finalized, I will be able to reapply for DIC.

Thanks everyone for the support and guidance I have received and especially to Berta and Chuck for their help and insight on Nehmer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Susan- at this point this is a SUCCESS but something seems wrong:

"estimated amounts".

That phrase from VA is something I have never seen before---- I wonder if they will pull that on me too.

I sent my funeral /burial stuff directly to the Philadelphia VARO ( who handles most if not all burial claims as well as some AO claims)

"Since 1993 they awarded 30% for all years for Don except the year plus one or two months recuperation after bypass surgery. That year was rated at 100%"

Did your husband receive SSDI at some point and was it solely for the IHD?

"The one year was held out on DIC because for some reason the date shows that I applied in 2001 which is wrong because I filed in 2000. That date is questionable and looks to be a whited out zero to "create" a number one from a zero. And as expectted DIC ended in June of 2007 since I remarried in July of 2007."

Under Nehmer I dont think it would matter when you even applied for DIC because I would think they should have used the date of his death for the DIC EED.I will check that in the Nehmer Trainng letter.

I would certainly appeal anything that seems wrong to you.

This stuff makes me furious. I know what it is like to get awards that contain errors.

"estimated amounts"

Boy I am sure disturbed over that one. Maybe they are trying to say there was not enough medical info to rate at the next level- but the fact is your husband's heart disease went from 30 % to 100% and it didnt happen overnight. They could have made a staged rating if they had enough medical info to do that.

I expect the same problem but spelled it all out as clearly as I could to the VA referencing the few med recs I had as to my husband's IHD.

I mentioned before that my husband's diagnosis of fatal and malpracticed heart disease came from me initially and not the VA.It took years but they finally concurred yet have never rated his 1151 IHD which became SC IHD last year.I had to file a NOD on that award letter because the IHD still remained unrated and contained multiple other errors.

Based on the medical evidence I had from VA, they need to stage a rating of at least 100% for the initial heart attack, then 10% for 4 years then up to 60% and then

determine when it became 100% again and enough to kill him.

Since the VA was aware of his IHD but failed to treat it or even tell us he had IHD-so we could get a real doctor to treat it-

I told them I wont accept the obvious SMC "S" award. I might be willing to accept an "estimated amount" if it seems correct but I am already prepared to get an IMO if it is wrong.

Will NVLSP be reviewing your claim?

(actually if they mean the 30% rating up to when it became 100% as an estimate, there could well be some med recs that might put that 30 into 60% at some point but maybe there are no records on that.Was VA his sole provider for heart disease care?)

I think this type of rating will happen to other survivors under Nehmer when VA did not have a fairly recent ECHO result and EKGS alone cannot fully determine the extent of IHD.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is from page 17 of the Nehmer Training Guide as to EEDS to include DIC claims:

EFFECTIVE DATES FOR RATING PURPOSES

The effective date for retroactive claims must be one of the following dates:

• The later of the following:

o The date VA received the claim, or a date prior to September 25, 1985, if the claim was pending or on appeal on September 25, 1985, or

o The date the disability arose

• The day following the date of the class member's separation from active service, if filed within one year from the date of separation

The effective date for Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) claims must be one of the following dates:

• The date VA received the claim, or

• The first day of the month of the Veteran’s death, if filed within one year from the date of the Veteran’s death

NOTE: If the class member’s claim for DIC for the death was either pending before VA on May 3, 1989, or was received by VA between that date and the effective date of the statute or regulation establishing a presumption of service connection for the covered herbicide disease that caused death, the effective date of the award will be the later of the date such claim was received by VA or the death occurred (38 C.F.R. § 3.816(d)(2)).

NOTE: 38 U.S.C. § 5110(g) and 38 C.F.R. § 3.114(a) do not apply to Nehmer claims.

"

The one year was held out on DIC because for some reason the date shows that I applied in 2001 which is wrong because I filed in 2000. That date is questionable and looks to be a whited out zero to "create" a number one from a zero."

That would give you the additional DIC.

NVLSP would be reviewing not only the accrued EED but also the DIC EED when they are aware of your award.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use