Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

800# Tip

Rate this question


Berta

Question

I have notes on the very few calls I made to 800# over the past 14 months.

I have the names of the reps and everything they told me,but come to find out,it was ALL the WRONG info.

Also I have 2 IRISes, my only IRISes over the past 16 months, and they too contain blatant lies.

You all know I was spitting fire when I got a ridiculous Nehmer decision the first week in December and I took action.

When VA Central called me, they said my C file (which I thought per 800 and IRIS ,was at Phila Nehmer for over a year per IRIS and the 800$ reps)

was being transferred to Phila right away and also they would obtain an expeditious medical opinion.

( I told the VACO caller that this expeditious opinion is about 23 years too late based on what my Nehmer EED should be)

( The EED is date of an ER med cert that called for cardio tests that never occurred)

I have no idea yet where my actual claims are.The first one was sent to wrong Nehmer VARO, then lost and then found per VA in 2010 and I sent a copy of it again with the evidence directly to the Phila VCSM (just in case it was missing again) and this second submission might now be lost too.

My tip is this- widows cant use E benefits so I have to click on the e -benefits thing to speak to a rep.

I started asking in last 2 calls for the rep's name and ID code.

If you call 800# have their name AND ID code and they give you false info, you can file a complaint that identifies who they are.

The rep I got the other day got very upset when I asked for his ID code.Then he gave me the wrong info on my CUE claim.

I questioned that and then he apologized and gave me the right info.(I think)He verified the C file and med recs had been transferred 10 days ago to Phila so I believe that as it confirms what VA Central said.

I have already requested the name of the doctor who will do this new opinion (which is a waste of taxpayers money and time because they have enough medical info already to rate the claim )

and I asked for the doctor's field of expertise because I also told VACO I am ready to get a forensic cardio IMO if needed if the opinion is wrong.

There already is a VACO medical opinion and a Peer Review from VA in my C file and 3 IMOs.

The veteran has not had any sustained improvement since his last posthumous C & P and he is still dead.

I did argue against this new VA opinion because I had muliple other VA opinions over the past 17 years that were all completely medically wrong.

There have been more Nehmer awards lately on some other sites,like VBN, but ours have trickled down.

I think the new Nehmer deadline might be 12-31-2011.

I also think mine might be the last Nehmer claim they do. It is a little unusual but not medically difficult.

Since VA wants these Nehmer claims off their back ASAP, maybe it is now my turn to string them out. :rolleyes:

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 2
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

2 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

PS- I apologise for that griping because I sure want to wish each of you a Wonderful Christmas and Happy New year!!!!!

I know MANY are waiting for the end of their long ordeals with the VA and I encourage all of you to hang in there and persevere!

Dont overlook submitting a single piece of potential evidence.

I have had countless denials over the past 17 years.I was told by lawyers ( for my FTCA case) and by many POA reps that my VA claims would never succeed.I had no support at all except from my daughter.

Although every award letter I got was wrong, still those claims did succeed anyhow once the evidence was actually read.

I wanted to give up once in the summer of 1996.I had received an SSOC that still is very painful to read.The VA tried to attribute my husband's death to something that was just unconscionable.With no medical rationale at all.It would have been considered as a slanderous statement in a civil court.I felt like they had beat me into the ground.

Within a few hours I recovered from that devastating statement,and called the VA Doctor who made the statement,raising Hell with him -only to find his actual statement was much different than the way VA manipulated it in the SSOC .Then I beat THEM into the ground. The Buffalo VA had withheld from the C & P doctor the most important medical evidence I had.They even withheld this critical evidence from VA Central doctors in 1997.

I spoke to this VA doctor again a few years ago.He agreed with the DMII claim I had filed.

I asked him if he could do a VA opinion for it but he said he knew I had knocked down 2 opinions he did already for VA on my other claim so they sure wouldn't let him opine again on my new claim.We both laughed at that.

It pays to get the actual C & P results when they are available because sometimes they are manipulated in the SOCs to the claimant's detriment.

NEVER give up on your claims!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Don't ever give up on your claims!

Please Never walk away from your claim.

And one can never have too much evidence.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Within a few hours I recovered from that devastating statement,and called the VA Doctor who made the statement,raising Hell with him -

only to find his actual statement was much different than the way VA manipulated it in the SSOC .

It pays to get the actual C & P results when they are available because sometimes they are manipulated in the SOCs to the claimant's detriment.

Berta,

I am in total agreement with the above and many, many times have compared the actual C&P

to the Rating Decision, SOC and or SSOC - and been angered at just how convoluted a decision maker

had changed and/or omitted some of the most essential parts of a C&P examination results.

Things of this nature do not happen by chance.

This - in my opinion, is done in an attempt to support a poor decision that is usually a denial,

or a lowball on the evaluation percentage.

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • ArmyTom earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • kidva earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • kidva went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • kidva earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • dennis simpson earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use