Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Something Strange At Va

Rate this question


Guest anfrnkie

Question

Guest anfrnkie

something strang has happend at va with my claim, yesterday i got a ssoc, i checked and sent in to va i asked how my claim is going i was told my claim has been sent to washington,i asked at the bva as i always stated do not send to bva,va said no it was sent to washington as they pick claims at ramdon and mine was picked i can.t understand what this means need help with this one, thanks franj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • HadIt.com Elder

A few claims are routinely reviewed at a higher level to see if it was done right. Unfortunately it appears to be claims that were granted as opposed to denials.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest anfrnkie
A few claims are routinely reviewed at a higher level to see if it was done right. Unfortunately it appears to be claims that were granted as opposed to denials.
pete i still don,t get why would they send a ssoc then it goes to washington,? they tell me it is not at bva so where could it be and what are they doing to it ?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

there is a congressional team and they do what are called STAR reviews, they order so many C Files per RO and they check them for accuracy, from the initial claim thru the point the file is now, they are checking the personnel at the VARO to see if they are doing the claims properly.

If that is the review process yours got caught in be happy, it should cut a lot of the BS out of the system, if it was approved and then DC asked for a quality audit then it could be in a different office entirely, the STAR review is a good process, I just wished they checked more files per office than they do, we might get better decisions on initial claims, and there may be fewer vets dying before their claims get adjudicated.

100% SC P&T PTSD 100% CAD 10% Hypertension and A&A = SMC L, SSD
a disabled American veteran certified lol
"A journey of a thousand miles must begin with a single step."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest jstacy

That is a good point to bring up. Kind of like a resturant inspection. Hey Joe, Star is coming to inspect. DO we have those perfect cases we made to show them.

That is what you are up against. Corruption in its finest form. It needs to be an independant panel made up of disabled Veterans who Know the system and who answer to no one that deals with the VA.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also the Knight Ridder investigations last year in the Washington Post reflected an average of 41 % error rate in Remanded VARO work.

The fact is that although there are checks in place-such as the Star system- nevertheless-

only about 39% of VARO employees by their admissions in a survey done by the IG are able to fully do viable claims work.

Add that with the documented fact of the figures uncovered by Knight Ridder in the Washington Post last year- as to the error rate- and seems to me-the chances of a veteran getting anyone to properly handle their claim is less than 20%.

I bet the odds at a race track or the state lottery might even be better than that.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My C-file is also in washington for random review. This only happened after my claim was approved.

On the one hand, I'm glad they are reviewing my file. If it is thorough, my claim is a good example of VARO literally breaking several laws to repeatedly deny me benifits. Other than it finally being approved at 100%, I doubt the regional office would have chose to have it reveiwed. They called CUE on themselves and awarded me an EED to my original claim, though I did not NOD or appeal that denial. (ignorant as I was)

On the other hand, they should also reveiw denied claims. These are the corner stone to veterans problems. This is where the truth lies. Also, I was schedualed for re-evaluation in may. It hasn't happened yet because my file is gone. I will be awarded P&T at some point (brain damage being permanant and all) and this delay is costing my daughter. She starts college in Aug. Not to mention that they have been unable to adjust my dependants status.

Time

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • jERRYMCK earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use