Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

New Evidence For Bva

Rate this question


qwiksting

Question

Hello to all, I was wondering if someone could help me out with some advice. I submitted a claim to the VA in 2007. I have esophagitis, with a hiatus hernia. Also GERD. I returned from Iraq in 2005, was discharged in 2006, went to the VA and began getting treated and diagnosed, (upper GI)and then treated with omeprazole and some kind of nasty thick liquid stuff. The Doc called for a endoscopy, so I waited for an appt. which never happened. So the next time I went in for an Appt. Doc wanted to know about the endoscopy, so he pulled up something on his computer, and it said it was put in as a routine procedure and was denied. This went on one more time till the Doc had to call Gastro to set it up himself. 2yrs into the process. Got the scope done and was discovered a Hiatus hernia and GERD with a small ulcer. Like I said earlier I submitted the claim in july 2007. In Feb 2008 It was denied, stating" that everything had resolved itself". I then put in an appeal with the VA, spoke with a DAV person who was helping me. I was given a choice as to where my appeal would go, and was advised that it should go to a DRO. Anyway,I think a mistake was made and it got sent to the Board of Veterans appeals in Washington DC. I don't understand the paperwork flow but it is what it is. So, today I had another Endoscopy done at the VA, and the findings are:

Moderately severe esophagitis seen in the distal third of the esophagus(530-10) Biopsy taken

34-37 cm level esophagitis

A hiatus hernia was found in the GE junction (553.3) 37-40 cm level

Erosive gastritis was found in the antrum (553.40) Biopsy taken

Normal body of the stomach, cardia, and funds. Two biopsies taken

Normal Duodenum

This looks similar to the first Endo that was done in 2007, when I filed my claim.

my question is, do I, or can I submit this to the BVA, and if I can how do I do it?

Thank you for listening and or helping me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Posted Images

Recommended Posts

  • 0

deanbrt,

According to the BVA's OWN 2011 Annual "Report Of The Chairman",

I consider you to be VERY FORTUNATE to have received timely appeal results.

http://www.bva.va.gov/docs/Chairmans_Annual_Rpts/BVA2011AR.pdf

"The average length of time between filing the appeal and the Board’s disposition was 883 days"

From my personal experience with my appeal process to the BVA:

Decision Date: 05/19/10

This case comes to the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board)

from a May 2000 rating decision.

Remaining issues from this decision that are under remand instruction

have yet to be settled -

so currently I am still in a holding pattern for almost

2 FULL YEARS, on remanded issues alone.

I - as many claimants in appeals status, have very few good things to say

in regards to the timeliness of appeals adjudication, at any level.

JMHO

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

What am I missing here? BVA 240 days....

And AOJ means?

"AOJ Agency of Original Jurisdiction"

'

"Certification of Appeal to BVA AOJ 585 days"s

Let me guess. These poor vets went DRO.....

Read the underlined......

The average length of time between filing the appeal and the Board’s disposition was 883 days.

The following chart demonstrates the average time intervals for particular portions of the appeals process.

* This includes the Board’s cycle time of 119 days. Cycle time measures the time from when

an appeal is physically received at the Board until a decision is reached, excluding the time the

case is with a VSO representative for preparation of written argument.

38 U.S.C. § 7101(d)(2)(E)

The number of members of the Board at the end of FY 2011: 64 members

The number of professional, administrative, clerical and other personnel employed by the Board at

the end of FY 2011: 471 employees not including 64 members above.

38 U.S.C. § 7101(d)(2)(F)

Number of acting members of the Board during FY 2011: 94

Number of cases in which acting members participated: 11,613

38 U.S.C. § 7101©(2)

Number of acting members of the Board in terms of full-time employee equivalents: 15.4

Time Interval Responsible Party

Average Elapsed

Processing Time

Notice of Disagreement Receipt

to Statement of the Case

AOJ 257 days

Statement of the Case Issuance to

Substantive Appeal Receipt Appellant 41 days

Substantive Appeal Receipt to

Certification of Appeal to BVA AOJ 585 days

Receipt of Certified Appeal to

Issuance of BVA Decision*

BVA 240 days

Average Remand Time Factor AOJ 427 day

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

257+41+585=883

If you get it to BVA it goes quick. My personal belief is the DRO route is a killer. My opinion. The trick is to get to BVA as soon as you can. No other claims until you know it is there and read what I underlined in my last post. Using a VSO may cause you to lose months if not more while BVA waits for them to review things. Lastly, there is one man on this site that could make all the difference in your life and his name is Hoppy....

Processing Time.

Notice of Disagreement Receipt

to Statement of the Case

AOJ 257 days

Statement of the Case Issuance to

Substantive Appeal Receipt Appellant 41 days

Substantive Appeal Receipt to

Certification of Appeal to BVA AOJ 585 days

Receipt of Certified Appeal to

Issuance of BVA Decision*

BVA 240 days

Average Remand Time Factor AOJ 427 days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

"Remaining issues from this decision that are under remand instruction

have yet to be settled -

so currently I am still in a holding pattern for almost

2 FULL YEARS, on remanded issues alone."

That reads to me that BVA remanded back to the RO, in which case you are in for a wait. That is not BVA but the RO. If that is indeed the case my guess is that your wait is tied to the Nehmer decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

deanbrt:

I agree with your assesments totally. As stated earlier in this thread my file is now with the VLJ and when something changes as to my status i will let the board know this information. It was 530 day's from NOD 09/16/2010 to 03/13/2012 CERTIFICATION to BVA. My total delay time from denial of claim to submission of my NOD was only 3 day's. As stated earlier the major delay's are times waiting for hearing's either at the dro level (such as mine)or at the bva level and also VSO'S holding up review,s at both varo and bva levels of appeals. All this waiting already compounded by the fact that the raters and dro's never READ or COMPREHEND the evidence in front of them has really convinced me that the DRO REVIEW routes are a total complete waste of time. After all this if the VLJ has remanded any or all your claim you still wait in another line to get re-adjudicated all over again by the same idiot's who more times than not wrongfully denied your claim the first time. I DIDN'T SIGN UP FOR THIS BS. LOL.

calie:

There will never be enough excuses to why your claim's took 10 years, and still today no FINAL adjudication. You are an exception, no doubt. I really admire your patience and stamina.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use