Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

Multiple Benzodiazepines

Rate this topic


Recommended Posts

Is it uncommon for a VA pysch to perscribe a long acting benzo like klonopin and a short acting, quick onset one like Xanax for an as needed basis?

I'm having the time of my life trying to get my Doctor to realize that the Klonopin is fine for most days, but doesn't touch a panic attack. Thus far she has been dead adamant against Xanax. It really doesn't need to be Xanax, just something with a much quicker onset time than Klonopin because if I take my entire daily dose (4mg) of Klonopin during a panic attack I might as well have taken a placebo because by the time it kicks in my mind is spinning so fast that I can't think straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 9
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • HadIt.com Elder

From my experience the VA is afraid of this class of drugs because of OD's in the past. My pain management doctor was dead set against my use of clonazepam. They believe that I will kill myself by accident. If I asked for xanax along with clonazepam they would slap my face because I take pain meds as well. I can understand why you want to take xanax for panic. I would never tell them I take four clonazepam at one time. In their minds they see you mixing the two drugs and ending up dead. Then they see their jobs in jepardy which is what they care about in reality. No drug is evil. It is the abuse of the drug that causes problems. The VA sees us all as drug abusers who are only being restrained by VA doctor's eagle eyes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

The VA is not afraid your Doctor is. I have had a prescription for xanax since 1991 and also tried clonopin. Not really helpfor for my problems. Am I addicted probably so but I have never taken more than my prescribed dose.

There are plenty of other meds the VA gives you that can kill you.

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Pete

You bet! Methadone is one of the worst and they prescribed it to me as well as morphine, and fentynal. The pain clinic doctors at my VAMC were the ones who hated all the benzodiazepines.

There is nothing wrong with Xanax. I have been getting clonazepam and valium and narcotics from my VA for years. I am not dead yet. I am careful with them because they make my apnea worse. Also, I hate rebound insomnia when I start to taper down if it start to hit the maximum dose. There is a difference between dependence and addiction. Most of us are dependent but not addicts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

I did 14 years on Klonopin. It was the only thing that stopped the panic attacks.

By accident my dose was halved by the druggist. I was a raving maniac for a week or do before I figured it out. The pills look identical in Hong Kong.

I decided I would try to get off the benzos. It took over a year. I only use them PRN now but my memory is shot.

The klonopin kept me pretty depressed: I tried suicide a couple of times on Klonopin. It's not a good OD drug unless you mix alcohol with it. Dont! And mixing Benzos is a terrible idea.

The shorter the half life of the drug the more addictive it is Xanax is very short.

Research shows panic attacks can increase up to five fold after only 10 straight days of short term benzo use. Stay away of you can.

Haven't had a full blown attack in 18 months since getting off high Klonopin dose.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Paxil is a good long term drug for panic. It has other side effects people don't like but compared to panic attacks they are probably worth it. If you are afraid to go out of the house due to panic try Paxil for six weeks and see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use