Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Bva Hearing 11/13 Headaches

Rate this question


mags1023

Question

I have my Video Conference hearing on Tuesday 11/13 at Bay Pines, so I will fill all in on how the proceedings go.

One of the issues I have on appeal is headaches and I got a letter from my doctor that states:

His headaches have a significant vascular component, although they are not classic migraine. He also gives history of at least 2 motor vehicle accidents where he sustained severe cervical strain and possible concussion. In my opinion his vascular headaches are being driven by his suboccipital neuritis by way of trauma.

Both of my auto accidents were while I was on active duty and I am hoping this is enough of a nexus for the VA to service connect me for my headaches secondary to my cervical spine condition. What do the experts on hadit think???

Edited by mags1023

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

Hi Carlie and thanks for responding. Yes,I have Bosely and Bratch as my rep and the attorney in the St Pete area seems very knowledgeable. I am just getting nervous, because I have waited so long and just hope I have enough evidence to convince the Judge. The C&P examiners have all tried to say my headaches are not caused by my cervical spine problems, but it is obvious because I started getting them right after my condition got worse. I even received an increase on my condition from 10% to 30% due to a decrease in my ROM.

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mags,

I have put both of your post in this thread together

to try and help out.

I have my Video Conference hearing on Tuesday 11/13 at Bay Pines, so I will fill all in on how the proceedings go.

One of the issues I have on appeal is headaches and I got a letter from my doctor that states:

His headaches have a significant vascular component, although they are not classic migraine. He also gives history of at least 2 motor vehicle accidents where he sustained severe cervical strain and possible concussion. In my opinion his vascular headaches are being driven by his suboccipital neuritis by way of trauma.

I wish letter stated something to the effect of,

It is my medical opinion that the patient has headaches which are at least as likely as not, secondary to his service connected cervical condition.

My medical opinion on XYZ (that shows medical rationale as to how/why

they are connected - related as secondary).

It is my opinion that these headaches the impact the patient's life by

XXXXXXXX

8100 Migraine:

With very frequent completely prostrating and prolonged attacks productive of severe economic inadaptability 50

With characteristic prostrating attacks occurring on an average once a month over last several months 30

With characteristic prostrating attacks averaging one in 2 months over last several months 10

With less frequent attacks 0

Both of my auto accidents were while I was on active duty and I am hoping this is enough of a nexus for the VA to service connect me for my headaches secondary to my cervical spine condition. What do the experts on hadit think???

Weren't the active duty auto accidents factored into the decision

that SC'd your cervical condition.

For a claim for secondary,the nexus would not be the auto accidents -

the nexus would be medical rationale to support the HA's as a secondary condition

related to the already SC'd condition.

I believe the evidence of the active duty auto accidents would be used under a

claim for direct SC of your HA's.

Hi Carlie and thanks for responding. Yes,I have Bosely and Bratch as my rep and the attorney in the St Pete area seems very knowledgeable. I am just getting nervous, because I have waited so long and just hope I have enough evidence to convince the Judge.

The C&P examiners have all tried to say my headaches are not caused by my cervical spine problems, but it is obvious because I started getting them right after my condition got worse. I even received an increase on my condition from 10% to 30% due to a decrease in my ROM.

What did the C&P examiners state was the reason/s for your HA's ?

Did the decision that increased your cervical from 10% to 30% mention

ANYTHING about HA's in the Reasons and Bases Section ?

carlie

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

I wish the IMO spelled out all the connections to service in simple and direct language. You can't assume the VA will make these connections. You have to have your doctor dot all the I's and cross all the T's.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry it took until now to post, but I just got back from Tampa. Thanks to all for the comments. Yes, I presented my Dr. with a letter that stated all that John and Carlie pointed out and hoped he would sign it, but he just provided me with the letter I quoted here. I think it was enough, but we'll have to wait and see.

Now on to the board. I was scheduled in the afternoon of the 13th (1230) and my letter stated that it could take several hours as they had many scheduled for that afternoon. My lawyer and I met in the cafeteria at the Bay Pines Regional facility at 1115. We signed in at the office that took care of appeals and told them we would be in the cafeteria. To my surprise and pleasure, the Bay Pines rep came by our table at about 1200 and said we were next and that we could go in to the holding room right next to the Video Conference room. We were in session at about 1220. The Video conference room was set up nicely with a large screen and the judge is the only person you can see on the other side. It was like watching TV only you got to talk back to it.The administrative Judge was very pleasant as we presented my case. My lawyer (Dan Smith), who works for Bosley and Bratch, did a great job of presenting my evidence and prompting my testimony. The Judge seemed very engaged and she said she would ask her questions after we completed my case. My wife was also in the hearing room and she testified on my behalf. Once we completed, the Judge only asked me a couple of questions, but they were very specific and I feel like she believed we had proven that my back should be service connected and that my headaches are secondary to my cervical spine condition. She stated that it could still be several months until I receive a decision. We were out of there just before 1300.

I was a little nervous going in to the hearing, but felt comfortable after the first couple of minutes. My lawyer did tell me that the Judge was one of the most congenial he had seen and that some of them are very contentious. I guess I was lucky, now I just hope to get good news when the decision is rendered. Overall, I would say if you are going to a board, have all your evidence lined up. I highly recommend representation and I am very glad I hired Bosley and Bratch to represent me. They have supported me all the way through the process and they don't know if they will receive a dime. I truly feel that they are not concerned with the money aspect and are there for the Vets! I'll update this when I receive my decision. Please feel free to ask me any questions you might have.

s/ Mags

We kept our promise and served honorably. Now it is time for the VA to keep their's!

I am not an attorney or VSO and offer my opinions free of charge. Any advice I provide in my posts is from experiences I have had with the VA or I have the knowledge that others have encoutered. I accept no liability for this advice should you chose to follow it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

mags,

Sounds like a good video hearing.

If you want to check out some of the judge's prior decisions

you can do a fairly simple search at the link below.

My guesstimate is you will hear some answers in between

3-12 months.

http://www.index.va.gov/search/va/bva.html

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
    • karlduerr earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use