Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Doa

Rate this question


sbrewer

Question

  • Answers 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

Thanks Berta,

I just talked to my husband and he said it did not say DRO, so I guess we'll find out soon. I beleive when he heard from the SO Friday, that he said they would make a decision then.

What is Dept. of Adjucation?

sbrewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay so apparently it was DRO. He got his letter in the mail today. 0% for the left toe, but at least they somewhat admitted they screwed it up. Does a 0% mean anything?

The front of letter stated the following:

Monthly entitlement amount/ payment start date/reason for change

$112.00 Jan.1, 2006 This is a DRO grant with no change on amend

$757.00 Jun1,2006 No change on amend

He had been 10% for 26 yrs., so why does the first line say Jan.1,2006 and what does "this is a DRO grant with no change on amend"?

thanks,

sbrewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If it says on the rating sheet (if they attached that) "0" SC-it means they recognized it as Sec 1151 but cannot rate it-

This was my concern all along sbrewer-

How did this affect him- did he need a special orthopedic shoe? affect to balance?

tendency to infection from rubbing on shoes, does nhis job require standing for hours with resulting pain due to the toe problem---- etc etc-

I knew they should award "as if" SC under Sec 1151 but I could not determine of it was close to even 10% ratable.

I believe he might have other claims to focus on for SC- which would provide a compensatable award-

What a Zero "as if " means- if it gets worse it is already Sced-thus zero could change-

also if this "as if" disability ever should have a contributory cause to his death- long stretch -you never know-

it sets the stage for DIC under 1151-

A widow who killed her husband at close range and went to jail got DIC after her incarcination as the VA decided that the veteran's PTSD contributed to his death.

(by causing him to be abusive to her and -in self defense -she killed him)

One cannot discount any possible scenario regarding anything at all re: the VA.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks Berta for quick response. He was happy to get the 0 because they at least admitted fault. He is still in pain with the toe, however he also in the mail today received an app. for pain management. Oddly enough he has been doing his own research and b-12 deffeciancy can cause a number of problems including tingleing like neuropathy. He is a diabetic and his primary care dr. put him on metformin(please read attached article)http://www.umm.edu/altmed/ConsSupplements/VitaminB12Cobalamincs.html

She also started giving him b-12 injections and according to the neurologist she didn't do that right and only gave him 5 shots. He talked to the neurologist about it and all of a sudden she(primary care) precscribed b-12 tablet. Now we are wondering if he didn't just have a b-12 deffeicency all along causing all these problems which would mean unneccssary toe surgery to start with...He is currently filling out paperwork to change primary care dr. This is the same one that told him "she couldn't stand all these people coming there for government handouts". Instead of playing MD, she likes to pretend to be a pych, podiatrst, cardiologist, and neurologist. She also had him on Elavil for neuropathy-the neurologist immediatly took him off of it and said with his history of depression he should not have been of it.....She also had him on something for depression and the pych. took him off of it and said no to it.....anyway did you know what this meant.... $112.00 Jan.1, 2006 This is a DRO grant with no change on amend

thanks,

sbrewer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Now we are wondering if he didn't just have a b-12 deffeicency all along causing all these problems which would mean unneccssary toe surgery to start with...He is currently filling out paperwork to change primary care dr. This is the same one that told him "she couldn't"

YEAH!!!!!!!!!!

Thiamine , and B 12 - they treat numbness due to PN with this-

it is associated in the DMII training letter-the PN as well as foot problems- due to circulation-

had a vet who just lost his second foot to DMII- gangrene had set into the first lost foot while he was receiving VA medcial care-

YEAH-

I see what you mean! The diabetes caused a reason for them to treat him with the B 12 as it had already caused problem in his toe- and potential unneeded surgery------

That might be worth more than the "0"

If the diabetes caused this toe problem- what else could it have caused- that they didnt pick up on----

might be a long shot- but worth looking into!

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use