Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Burn Pits And Airborne Hazards

Rate this question


pacmanx1

Question

  • Moderator

Registry for Veterans who may have been exposed

VA's Airborne Hazards and Open Burn Pit Registry will allow OEF/OIF/OND and 1990–1991 Gulf War Veterans exposed to burn pit smoke and other airborne hazards to document their exposures and report health concerns. Veterans will enter information through a web-based questionnaire and have the opportunity to obtain an evaluation.

As part of developing this registry, we are asking Veterans to review the proposed questionnaire (263 KB, PDF). Tell us if the draft questionnaire asks the right questions. Submit your comments by August 20, 2013, the new, extended deadline. Read the July 24 Federal Register notice to learn how to comment.

http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/burnpits/action-plan.asp

My intentions are to help, my advice maybe wrong, be your own advocate and know what is in your C-File and the 38 CFR that governs your disabilities and conditions.

Do your own homework. No one knows the veteran’s symptoms like the veteran. Never Give Up.

I do not give my consent for anyone to view my personal VA records.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 5
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Popular Days

Top Posters For This Question

5 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

THANKS Pete ...good info and I hope vets will take the time to prepare a comment on this .

VA reads every comment when we take advantage of this opportunity to have input into VA policy.

Sometimes the VA will follow up in the Federal Register ,with references to specific commenter's remarks..

Veterans, specifically those who can state some first hand accounts and the affects of the burn pits and other environmental hazards they personally have experienced, as well as veterans lawyers, vet reps and advocates can impact,in my opinion, on the way some of these proposed notices and potential amendments to all sorts of VA related issues that affect us all.

I am glad you gave the link not only to the Federal Register (they have had 299 comments all ready) but also the link at VA to the Registry.

I always edit and type my comments into a Office org Doc and then copy and paste into the comment section.You will get a verification that they received the comment ,with an ID number, or just look for it at the Fed Reg site ...might take a day or more before it gets posted there.....

It will take time for anyone to go through the draft questionnaire , to see what they feel should be changed, and I am anxious to read today, what other commenters wrote.

Edited by Berta

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To add, one of the first comments, from PGW veteran, Jeannette Haynes, really says it all...

Veterans are doing a good job there to comment on where they were, what they were exposed to, and how it has affected them.....

The detailed questionnaire also does a good job ( for the VA) by asking about post service occupations.. VA will look for any post service occupation that could have caused a veteran's exposure and disability to any non military cause....regardless of what type of claim they have....

Also a post service occupation such as farming, and the other occupations listed in the questionnaire , involve exposures to many types of burning and fumes but if a vet has COPD for example, and they were exposed to GW contaminants ,it will take a strong IMO to overcome any VA denials that hinge on post service employment ...an IMO that can successfully state the actual etiology of the COPD was during the Gulf/Iraq/Afganistan War and was excerbated by work situations after service.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does this include the Vietnam vets who was exposed to burning pit of general trash and old used medical trash and human waste from the potty?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No,this is for OEF/OIF/OND and 1990–1991 Gulf War Veterans.

Vietnam vets often used any empty containers they could find to wash their clothes in or use for barbeque pits, or for sh-tters.

Sometimes they used empty AO drums.

You raise a good point because maybe this environmental hazard issue in the Gulf would help support any Vietnam vet as well who has a disability directly due to whatever the VA decides might be attributable to burn pits, etc.

"old used medical trash" certainly is a concern too.....probably disposed of during the Gulf War far more carefully then it was in Vietnam.


No,this is for OEF/OIF/OND and 1990–1991 Gulf War Veterans.

Vietnam vets often used any empty containers they could find to wash their clothes in or use for barbeque pits, or for sh-tters.

Sometimes they used empty AO drums.

You raise a good point because maybe this environmental hazard issue in the Gulf would help support any Vietnam vet as well who has a disability directly due to whatever the VA decides might be attributable to burn pits, etc.

"old used medical trash" certainly is a concern too.....probably disposed of during the Gulf War far more carefully then it was in Vietnam.

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just remember pulling out a old 55 gal drum cut about a 1/3 up that was placed under the crapper and pouring in diesel fuel and setting them on fire. This was done every day when in base TO EVERY shi**** had to be burned.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use