Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Received 5103 Notice For Remand - Questions....

Rate this question


justrluk

Question

Good afternoon,

Well, I finally received the notice to respond with more support for remanded items from my appeal. I started digging through my copy of my c-file to see if there were any documents the VA asked for that were already in the file. Much to my surprise, I found reports from my STRs that were from the '80s (which the VARO said did not exist in previous decisions, this appeal, etc...) that support my issue that a condition started surfacing while on my initial enlistment. This supports my contention that the issue did NOT pre-exist service, but brings something else to light: if the records are in my hands as part of my c-file, is it a CUE that the VARO never saw/used them?

Also, the latest documents needed by one treating physician are not in my c-file. She is also currently claiming that I owe her $$ from a claim she didn't file timely with TRICARE and was therefore not reimbursed. I assume she will not release the requested treatment records until I pay her the $400.00 she claims I owe. Do I try to get the VA to get the records knowing it will take months, or try to get them myself? I cannot afford to pay her the cash she is demanding (we've been going around and around since 2011), but the remand mentions her by name as having records that will support my claim. HELP!!! I want this over with, but not so much as to sacrifice all the years of work to get to this point only to have things denied because of one doctor's bad billing practices/claims filing.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 17
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Danger. Danger Justrluk. Nobody who is tightly screwed down should ever be telling you to go off your meds to provoke the disease/injury you seek a rating or increase on. Better to show disease controlled by medication and have a documented medical record showing symptomatology and chronicity/continuity. The potential for this to backfire on you is phenomenal. By law, you would be required to inform them of what meds. you are on---or aren't. By either lying or omitting the truth, you have endangered your claim by fraud. That a VSO would suggest it is unsavory. The idea is to win legitimately, not by subterfuge or deceit. We won't discuss the danger to you personally (and medically) for doing it. That's a no brainer. If that is Mr. Service rep's secret weapon, your legal strategy is in deep doo doo.

I recommend my guys take copies of all the medrecs they can assemble with them to the C&P. I know full well VA says not to but note that they do not forbid it. Doctors are inherently self-critical and insecure. If there is anything about you s/he can read about to inform them about your illness/ injury, trust me they will gobble it up. They, too, know they are supposed to do it by Braille, but none of them can look away when an opportunity to plagiarize comes along. They reason that a hippocratic mind must, by doctor law, use anything to get to the bottom of an etiology. If it means peeking, so be it. Doctors hate to be wrong.

I "cheated" and did this on my AO porphyria claim C&P. The QTC doctor didn't even blink. All he did was ask if he could keep the records.

Edited by asknod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

asknod,

I hear you and thought this was a stretch. I WILL NOT do this dishonestly because the least I can do form myself is keep whatever dignity I have left. I have diaries that show periods of flare up that occurred when the VA stopped my Humira (three times since 2010) and the inability to walk without a cain from the car to my building. Horrible... no sleep either due to pain from arthritis. I just don't know how much I will be able to present, but I can narrate a summary I'm sure. I have tallied numbers of days, but since they don't all occur within the same one-year period, don't know how much I'll be able to use. I can only show the pattern and let the rest takes it's course.

Thanks for shedding some light on my integrity!

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Also (just thought of this question), I thought when I filed a waiver of VARO consideration this applied to the new evidence I would submit in support of my appeal. My VSO told me this only applied to material I submitted at the time of the hearing. Which is correct?

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Just for follow up: I was notified of a pending C&P exam for last Saturday. I show up prepared and with documents for psoriatic arthritis and neck, but when the C&P NP starts to interview me, she asked questions re: GERD. I filed a claim in 2010 which was denied, then filed an appeal but asked it be dropped. The VLJ brought the issue up during my hearing and in the remand ordered the VARO to issue a SOC. I thought they would just write the document, but a C&P for something already denied??? Now I'm really confused. Also, this wasn't the C&P for the REAL issue, so now what??? Wait some more for the PsA C&P! What a mess. I figure the best I'll get is 10% (if I'm lucky). I guess you can't push a wet noodle that far...

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Rating was included in the colon resection rating, but still acknowledged as service connected. This is at least a positive outcome. No C&P for the remanded issues yet, though. No SSOC for GERD either.

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use