Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Back Injury And Nerve Damage

Rate this question


ArNG11

Question

Wanted some opinions on how to pursue a claim for a back injury that I am service connected for and was given a 10% for L1 and 10% for partial paraliys of lower left extremity.still within NOD period. By regs all Ive been able to find is about and entitlement to 40% maybe 60% with the nerve damage to this injury. I am a little stumped on the muscle and nerve ratings. VA only mentioned connection for L1 from an older MRI I submitted but mentioned no others. Wanting opinions on course of actions and possible avenues to have my injury rated fairly.

Specifics.

Lumbar MRI

disk dehydration lower thorasic spine. Notably L1-L2 and L3-4. Prominent Schmorl node herniation along inferion end plate L1

Small disk protrusion T11-T12 effacement of anterior CSF space and central canl space narrowing. Minor disk bulge L1-2 minimal narrowing proximal foramina

L2-3 far right lateral disc protrusion into nerve root foramen contributing to a mild narrowing/stenosis of the right foramen at L2-3

L3-4 broad bulging disc mild face degenerative change. Significant central canal space narrowing suggesting mild aquired central stenosis. Mild stenosis right foramen. Small protrusion out laterally resulting in moderate stenosis of left forament likely some mass effect on the exiting left sided L3 nerve root.

mulilevel degenerative disc disease of mild to moderate degree. Central disc protrusion at t-11-12 significant central canal space narrowing. Boderline mild central stenosis on degenerative basis L3-4. small protrusion out laterally on the left resuliting in moderate stenosis of the left foramen. likely mass effect on left side exiting L3 nerve root. small far right

lateral disk protrusion L2-3 resulting in mild narrowing/stenosis of the right foramen at that level.

mild to moderate mid throasic scoliosis curve to the right

mild multilevel degerative disc disease

tiny right paracentral disc protrusion suggested t5-6 and t6-7

mild disc dehydration upper, mid and very lower throsic spine.

any info and opinions gladly welcomed

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I can tell you from my experience is that whenever you muscles in your back rips they will not heal properly and will keep ripping and other muscles will begin to rip. These rips will cause the joints in the spine to become loose and be able to move around a lot more freely. This is the cause of Osteoarthritis, where the cartilage in the joints deteriorate over time. When this happens o'boy you best be ready for the worse pain. People don't understand that whenever you lose height in your spine the nerves become impinged and actually twisted because of this. This is why surgery will not help...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

How long your MRI report is will not correlate to how your back injury will be rated! You are letting a lot of detail in the MRI report de-rail you from objective analysis of your situation.

If you are rated 10% for a lumbar spine injury that would correlate to range of motion greater than 60 and not greater than 85 or evidence of arthritis in 2 major joint groups (thoracic and Lumbar, assuming you are SC for arthritis). The 10% rating for nerve issue would be consistant with mild or moderate imparment of a nerve (depending on nerve).

What you need to see is a reported ROM to compare to the schedule and you need to read the nuerologist opinion to see if the nerve issue is rated in accordance with the evidence. If you have SC for IVDS you need to look at how much "bed rest" was perscribed by a physician (which they almost never "perscribe bed rest" anymore).

If your C&P exam does not have the ROM testing (all three measurements) when you NOD you can state that a full an accurate C&P was not completed.

Your rating wasn't a fully developed claim was it? If it was the VA rated on the record at hand and had no "duty to assist" in developing the evidence for your rating.

Edited by 71M10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I can tell you from my experience is that whenever you muscles in your back rips they will not heal properly and will keep ripping and other muscles will begin to rip. These rips will cause the joints in the spine to become loose and be able to move around a lot more freely. This is the cause of Osteoarthritis, where the cartilage in the joints deteriorate over time. When this happens o'boy you best be ready for the worse pain. People don't understand that whenever you lose height in your spine the nerves become impinged and actually twisted because of this. This is why surgery will not help...

Sorry I know this is nit-picky but torn muscles are but one of the causes of osteoarthritis. However you get it, after years and years it really is a complete and total debilitating pain!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

No not taking it personally. The advise is fine. No it was not a FDC. Back injury is all that was stated when I filed. Made a mistake of listening to a non experienced VSO rep. But I am learning and I think to some degree I can use this to my advantage and turn it around. I just want a fair rating. For the time being ill keep getting evidence and reading the regs. I had a feeling the way I was rated was combining separate rating criteria. They ignored the "or's in rating qualifications besides evidence as well.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Sorry I know this is nit-picky but torn muscles are but one of the causes of osteoarthritis. However you get it, after years and years it really is a complete and total debilitating pain!

You are correct its ONE of the few reasons. Osteoarthritis happens in more 60+ of age. If you get it in your 30s and 40s then its called Traumatic Osteoarthritis which is most likely caused by a traumatic injury but not all the time. Yes there are those who have it in their 20s, 30s and 40s without it being traumatic and this is because its comes from a gene that can be detected on certain tests. I am thinking this is why the RO did a blood test on me earlier this year to see if it was genetic. I have traumatic osteoarthritis with about 6 impinged nerves throughout my spine. 4 are known and two was just found on Wednesday at L5-S1 level after waiting in pain for a year. It wasn't good news because the doc told me that since my feet are numb and has been numb that its more likely permanent. He did say there is a chance that the ESI that are being done might help but its gotten worse instead of better. Hopefully next Tuesday's injection will be at S1 and will kick it out. I know it may take two years to heal or it may never heal. Just take the pain away from my legs is what I want at the moment.

arng11 check your pm on here...

Edited by rpowell01
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I was an early adopter, back injury in 84, arthritis on exray in 88. The VA called my injury a "bone condition" even though the exray report (they didn't show me) showed multi level arthritis. I was 23 and was so ready to be done with the Army I never questioned the rating or the 0%, because they said if I needed medical care for it in the future, they would be there to help me. So I delt with the back issues and flare ups (2-3 times a year) until I was in rough shape in 2006. I really couldn't afford the co-pays for physical therapy so I called the VA (they promised). Was promplty told since I was 0% I couldn't enroll for any care through them, not even just service connected care because they would have no way of preventing me from being treated for other things as well(was getting smoke blown on me big time). Found Hadit and VAWatchdog and filed for an increase and got my records and found out all types of things the Army and VA never told me. Now I am 100% with two appeal's pending that will put me SMC S, and one that may provide a 10% rating all the way back to 12/1987. I would have been a whole lot cheaper for the VA just to have given me the physical therapy!

I do wonder, if I would have been told about the arthritis in 1988 and the VA would have actively pursued treating and managing this chronic condition, would I possibly be able to live without being in constant pain today?

Edited by 71M10
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use