Jump to content

Ask Your VA   Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
 Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • homepage-banner-2024.png

  • donate-be-a-hero.png

  • 0

Question About Eating Disorder Sc

Rate this question


Guest crazy

Question

My SVO has informed me that the VA frowns on Non-purging Bulimia or compulsive overeating as a SC condition, secondary or otherwise without EXTREME evidence. I feel as though my Psychiactric Practitioners opinion should support such a claim as she has diagnosed this condition related (secondary) to my depression. Is there anyone out there that has had any experience with this situation. I would greatly appreciate input.

semper fi

Edited by crazy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 10
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Recommended Posts

crasy

I have been trying for many years to get my compulsive overeating service connected, on account of being force fed in basic training, 5 minutes or less to eat, a meal eaten that fast, is not very healthy for a person. I also have tried to get it secondary to my PTSD, but keep getting denied, as the VA doesn't recognize it in their regulation, my Doctors feel it should be service connected to, and yes they are va doctors, but the va has their rules and that is what they go by, but I keep appealing, and will until I win or die, then wife will have to take over. there are a lot of private research on kids who eat their meals fast, develop poor eating habits for life, if I knew how, and could afford it, I feel their should be a class action suit, against the Military for their quick 5 minute meals in basic training, as i never ate fast before going into the army, but I do, yet to this day.

Les(In MN

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Jim S.

I'm with you Frosty69: Why is it that the VA gets to choose what part of an illness it chooses to allow for dissability purposes? It's like AO, PTSD, and others, it took a combined effort to get these SC for the VA to pay up.

Over eating is not something a person chooses to do, like the VA and others would imply, It's an excape mechanism and a feel good mechanism, no different than a alcoholic, a drug user, or a person who eats to little or purgess their food.

Do you realize that for some, the only difference between and overeater who's obese could be an overeater who purgeses and is Anorexic?

My bad eating habits started in boot Camp and were reinforced on board ship, Not everyone could fit in the galley during meal time, so it was eat fast and get out so someone else could sit down and eat.

Have you ever watched the movie "Major Pain" Their was a scene where he takes the beutiful co star out to dinner and they show the star wolfing down his meal, If you don't call that an eating disorder, then I don't how you can call starving yourself as one.

Jim S.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • HadIt.com Elder

Les:

I agree I eat to fast and I think I caught the habit in Army when they made us eat very fast and everything on the tray also.

Good luck on your claim

Veterans deserve real choice for their health care.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i think that the key here is the reason behind the compulsion. my frustration comes from the fact that anorexia is recognized and when you tip the scales the other way it is considered 'willful misconduct'. i dont necessarily want a high rating, I would be happy with a 0% so that the va would not use being overweight as an excuse for not rating a secondary bi-lateral knee condition. the scales of justice would not recognize the fact that when you have a bad knee already and favor it while suffering through years of difficult work.....your other knee is bound to pay the price. the va c&p ortho guy seems to be injecting his prejudice against being overwieght into the exam rather than being fair and objective. I am not ignorant and realize that weight is a contributing factor, but were it not for the initial knee condition, my circumstances would be quite different. sorry about the rant....had to get that off my chest.

take care

rob

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • RICHKAY earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • pacmanx1 earned a badge
      Great Content
    • czqiang1079 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Vicdamon12 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Panther8151 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use