Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nod Or A Reconsideration

Rate this question


hmcquade

Question

Would like some input. I have discussed the fact my claim for PAD secondary to my SC DM II was denied based on no nexus, lack of medical support of the claim.

I was going to file a NOD, a DAV SO at the Saginaw VA Hospital advised me to file a reconsideration with new medical evidence to support a Nexus, he stated it would be process faster than a NOD.

If I file a reconsideration will I get retro pay from the original claim date or will it be a new claim? I have one year from the date of the denial to file.

I am trying to get this all sorted out in my mind and make the best decision.

Thanks,

Hugh

Edited by hmcquade
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Recommended Posts

  • 0

WHO sang the song., IT FEELS LIKE THE FIRST TIME? WAS IT FORIEGNER?

Thats what they are singing at the RO when you fail to file a NOD . Because they know they got you. Unless you have the duckies to spend to go get an IMO, or can find something to CUE them, you got the shaft. They shall pull out the old reliable

" you previously were denied for assholism back in 95, the evidence you submitted is not new or material, therfore cannot be reconsidered, denied ."

Yes I believe it was Foreigner, and I agree with you. I did a NOD many years go on my Denial for SC Tinnitus, I won and at the same time proved the VA made a CUE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gee, Carlie. You have to watch these kids all the time. Motions for reconsideration are like cotton candy. Nobody at the VSOs seems to know that. I've seen a lot of guys time out on that and have to refile. Some even waste a few years trying to do a Freestanding Claim and find that out at the BVA. The VlJs must get a good chuckle out of it over Happy Hour across the street at Gordy's Bar and Grill.

a

I think it's more out of institutional lazyness that VSOs and their NSOs push denials to "reconsideration claims." Doesn't the POA of a claim file have to do a lot of work if there's an appeal? As pro-vet as any of them may be, there are only so many hours in the day. They can help get ten vets aimed in the right direction with an initial entitlement claim complete with the bluster about how much they're gonna fight to make it right, etc - and then there's little to do after that. Or they can help one vet who's claim decision is all discombobulated in the same amount of time...if not more.

I'm not saying there aren't good NSOs out there. It just seems like a hit-or-miss proposition, and so far I feel like I missed.

Now if I'd found hadit a year earlier, maybe I wouldn't be in the position I'm in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I can say this, when I filed my NOD for the Tinnitus denial, I did all the work, all the research, a lot of calls to the DAVSO, but in the end I was the person who gathered, organized, and presented my case to the Lawyer. The DAVSO was sitting there at the hearing and so was my wife. The DAVSO said very little, I did all the talking, and my wife had a chance to add her opinion.

I can say this, the DAV supervisor has never responded to my letters I mailed to him. A business person or a SO should always answer concerns addressed to him/her. I hope they read our messages on this board,

Hugh

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Gee, Carlie. You have to watch these kids all the time. Motions for reconsideration are like cotton candy. Nobody at the VSOs seems to know that. I've seen a lot of guys time out on that and have to refile. Some even waste a few years trying to do a Freestanding Claim and find that out at the BVA. The VlJs must get a good chuckle out of it over Happy Hour across the street at Gordy's Bar and Grill.

a

ask,

Yea buddy !

I can just see those VLJ's laughing it up over cocktails and burgers :-)

Carlie passed away in November 2015 she is missed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I've been representing Veterans at VA Regional Offices around the country for 7 years, and NEVER have heard of a Reconsideration of a Ratings Decision.

This concept has been popping up a lot the last year, and so I wrote about it on the Veterans Law Blog:

http://www.attiglawfirm.com/move/reconsideration-va-rating-decision-appeal/

I have asked every VSO that says there "IS" a Reconsideration process to point me to the CFR cite that allows it, or to the VA Procedures Manual (M21-1MR) that lays out that process, and nobody has ever been able to show it to me.

I suspect that what VSOs are calling a "reconsideration decision with new evidence" really a "reopened claim with new and material evidence", and that VSOs are talking Vets into doing this to boost the VSOs numbers (on paper) showing how many claims that they handle, but I'm just speculating from what some VSOs are telling me.

If you have New and Material Evidence, and it is DURING the one-year appeal period, file a NOD. NEVER try to reopen a claim that is still appealable - it's the surest way to LOSE your earlier effective date.

The ONLY way to protect your original filing date for past-due benefits purposes is to file a Notice of Disagreement within 1 year of the Notice of Action Letter delivering the rating decision.

Chris

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use