Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Va Games, New Claim Treated As A Reopen Instead Of A New One

Rate this question


ArNG11

Question

So in an interesting turn of events, the VA has got me curious. Long story short. I filed a back claim some time ago and I managed to get service connected. Ofcourse, I got lowballed and I requested an increase and claimed some secondary issues in this instance my hips. C&P exam done, osteoarthritis of hips acknowledged, but denied as no relationship to secondary injury from IVDS and deformity of L1 disk. Got an increase of 10% as if to offer me some cheese. Back to the no relationship... Well ofcourse not, my back injury was from being ejected from a HUMMV and falling on my back and left hip, that would be a primary cause of trauma but ok. So I filed a new claim specifically asking for service connection to my injury from falling out and landing on my hip and back. I didn't claim the back as I am service connected for that and have an appeal on the bogus rating. I specifically filed a new claim for my hips and knees and left finger. I know I don't want to get on the bandwaggon of what ebennefits states however, I chuckled. My status on ebennies is now a claim for reopen on the hips. Well I never filed an initail claim on the hips, i filed as a secondary issue, and I was denied as the marvelous C&P doc opinied that osteoarthritis of the hips is not caused by IVDS of L1 but of old age or traumatic injury. Well I'm only 39. That doesn't sound right. Hmmm you mean like a traumatic injury such as being ejected from a moving vehicle, say it isn 't so. Really, wow, I would have never made that connection. :dry: Ah this will blow up in there faces or possibly mine but nope I don't think so, I much rather this grenade blows up in their hands.

Anyways no surprise. I am really astonished in a sense but not really . I mean if they want to give an earlier effective date then sure I'll take that, however, this ploy has me ever so curious. But I am sure this is a funny ploy to deny the injury to the hips again. The claim states that it is a reopen for the hips and a new claim for injuries to my knees and the finger. Finger. Ah how I would like to give them the finger right about now. Nah I think I am going to recite the regulations and CFR but sure I can play this game as well.

If I specifically file a claim for my hips and knees without asking for a reopen of secondaries why would the VA do it now? Games. Stupid games.

How many times I wonder if these shannanagans weren't allowed and nipped in the posterior, how effective and timely would claims be processed. Hell you might even seem some deserved justice for veterans and dependants that get denied benefits.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Answers 4
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

Top Posters For This Question

4 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It sounds like someone looked at your file and saw the other injury. You might be getting the benefit of the doubt. I have read elsewhere that the VA is required to pursued inferred claims or claims not already filed but found while looking at other issues. This might be rare, but It could be what happened (just a guess, though).

Limbo is status quo for the VARO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I know how you feel, and I too am only 32 and medically retired from the navy at 30. I had two knee surgeries on my right knee while active. The VA granted me 0% SC last year, so I put an for an increase as I never had a C&P exam for this issue. So Feb 14 I go in for the C&P, and what did the VA do, no increase for the 0% but instead list it as a new condition of Painful Motion of the Knee, Granted 10%, WTH! So recently I put in for another FDC, and I put for my 0% R knee to be increased, Reopened the Left Knee which was denied at first all together, and put in for the Bilateral of both knees. I too, my right Hip is 3 inches out of alignment and the VA Chiro says due to the Bad Knees, Back and flat feet. I reopened the Back claim, as the VA again when I was retired did not perform a C&P. The Doc said that I was 6'3 well built and should not have issues as I was so young. Well guess what the same Doc said that I had no testicular issues, even though the month before I had Testicular Surgery due to an Bacteria I contracted in OEF. So a few months ago not only did the VA grant me 40% for the Testicle, but also SMC-K for loss of a Reproductive Organ. I hurt my back in OEF while active, and kept getting X-Rays, so the VA gave me MRIs and guess what happened next, L1, L3 and L5 crushed, Neck and Back Nerve damage causing swelling of the limbs and tingling, Bulging disc and DDD. So know the VA waited to long, that now I have a hole the size of a quarter in one of the Vertebrae. Now the Ortho Surgeon will not perform surgery as their is a great chance I could be paralyzed. I am sorry that I rambled, just tired of the Govt Screwing us over. God Bless, Good Luck and keep us posted.

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

""So a few months ago not only did the VA grant me 40% for the Testicle,''

so they give 40 percent for a testicle, but only 10 for erectile dysfunction. I guess they dont care because they are the ones doing all of the xxxxxx.. they are xxxxxxx us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Guys I really don't know where this is going to go but I will keep you guys posted. I just wanted to post what direction the VA is going with on my claims and maybe warn members here to keep an extra watchful eye on the shannanagans the VA is pulling.

Mr. A

:ph34r: " FIGHT TILL YOUR LAST BREATH " :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      First Post
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • stuart55 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Lebro earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Sparklinger earned a badge
      First Post
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use