Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Number Of Vets Effected

Rate this question


Mikemmlj

Question

  • Answers 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters For This Question

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Exposed to what bud?

100% PTSD

100% Back

60% Bladder Issues

50% Migraines 
30% Crohn's Disease

30% R Shoulder

20% Radiculopathy, Left lower    10% Radiculopathy, Right lower 
10% L Knee  10% R Knee Surgery 2005&2007
10% Asthma
10% Tinnitus
10% Damage of Cranial Nerve II

10% Scars

SMC S

SMC K

OEF/OIF VET     100% VA P&T, Post 911 Caregiver, SSDI

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I think he means how many were exposed to ionizing radiation.

"Operation Tomodachi (トモダチ作戦 Tomodachi Sakusen?, lit. "Operation Friend(s)") was a United States Armed Forces
assistance operation to support Japan in disaster relief following the 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami.
The operation took place from 12 March to 4 May 2011; involved 24,000 U.S. servicemembers, 189 aircraft, and 24 naval ships; and cost $90 million.[1]"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Tomodachi

Thats right,,,, 24,000 men and women serving in the Military could have been exposed to radiation fall out from the Fukusnima Nuclear disaster..

VA awards very few radiation claims as it is.

Fukushima, in my opinion, might become the next 'Agent Orange'.




"Within weeks of setting off a geiger counter and scrubbing three layers of skin off his hands and arms, former Navy quartermaster Maurice Enis recalled being pressured to sign away U.S. government liability for any future health problems.

Enis and about 5,000 fellow sailors aboard the USS Ronald Reagan aircraft carrier had finally left Japan, after 80-some days aiding victims of the March 11, 2011, Fukushima earthquake and tsunami, and were about to take a long-awaited port call in Thailand.

But first, they were told they needed to fill out some paperwork.

"They had us sign off that we were medically fine, had no sickness, and that we couldn't sue the U.S. government," Enis told The Huffington Post, recalling widespread anger among the sailors who saw it as "B.S." but who also felt they had little choice.

On Monday, the two-year anniversary of the Fukushima disaster, Enis joined a lawsuit with more than 100 other service members who participated in the rescue mission and who have since developed medical issues they contend are related to radioactive fallout from the disabled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant. Rather than targeting the U.S. government, the federal lawsuit names plant owner Tokyo Electric Power Co. the defendant.

TEPCO, as the company is known, provided false information to U.S. officials about the extent of spreading radiation from its stricken reactors, according to Roger Witherspoon on his blog Energy Matters.

Among the lawsuit plaintiffs is Enis' girlfriend, Jaime Plym, who also served as a quartermaster on the aircraft carrier, a position that involves guiding the ship and spending significant time on deck. The couple had been looking forward to leaving the military and starting a family. Now, Enis said, they don't know if children will be an option due to health problems they've both developed since signing away government liability. They've both been honorably discharged from the military and don't know how they will pay for medical treatment.

Plym has a new diagnosis of asthma and her menstrual cycle is severely out of whack. Enis has lumps on his jaw, between his eyes and on his thigh. He's also developed stomach ulcers and lung problems, and is losing weight and hair.

There's a tradition of growing out your hair and beard after leaving the Navy, explained Enis, to make up for all the time spent with a buzzed head. He said at a press conference in New York on Monday that he's hesitant to comb or wash his head of black curls lest he speed up the loss.
fukushima navy

Former Navy quartermaster Maurice Enis described the health problems, including hair loss, that he's suffered since working in radioactive plumes after the Fukushima disaster. (Lynne Peeples)

It was more than a month after arriving off the coast of Japan -- and circling at distances of one to 10 miles from the crippled reactors -- when sailors aboard the carrier got word that a nuclear plant had been affected, according to Plym. "Even then, it was rumors," she said. And it wasn't until the USS Ronald Reagan had left Japan and sailors were scrubbing down the ship that they were offered radiation protection. Enis said the enlisted sailors were never offered any iodine. He said he later learned the "higher ups" -- officers and pilots -- had received the tablets to protect their thyroids from radiation damage.

Enis said no one collected samples of sailors' blood or urine for tests. Neither Enis nor Plym have been fully evaluated by a doctor.

In his series detailing the sailors' situation, Witherspoon highlighted questionable U.S. government decisions that followed Fukushima, such as the halt of a federal medical registry planned for nearly 70,000 American service members, civilian workers and their families who may have been exposed. The Department of Defense "concluded that their estimates of the maximum possible whole body and thyroid doses of contaminants were not severe enough to warrant further examination," Witherspoon reported.

Without the registry, Witherspoon added, there will be "no way to determine if patterns of health problems emerge" as a result of radiation exposure among military personnel stationed in Japan, or among those just offshore with the USS Ronald Reagan Carrier Strike Group 7.

Enis recalled one day that convinced him of a connection.

He described at the press conference retrieving the American flag that had flown atop the carrier to give to the people of Japan as a ceremonial gesture. The wind, he recalled, caused the flag to flap around his body as he brought it down by rope. Only later did he realize the flag and the rope were probably highly contaminated with radiation.

After folding the flag, he went out to eat with his buddy. The two joked about growing extra fingers and toes, Enis said. Talk of a radiation leak had begun spreading onboard, despite being downplayed by officials. On a whim, the friends decided to get checked for radiation. His friend tested clean, but the geiger went crazy on Enis' hands.

"Instantly, we went from smiling to just being nervous and scared," Enis recalled. "No one told me at the time what was going on."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/11/fukushima-navy-health-problems_n_2855529.html

Recent update here:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2014/07/22/American-Fukushima-First-Responders-Fight-Radiation-Sickness-3-Years-Later

GRADUATE ! Nov 2nd 2007 American Military University !

When thousands of Americans faced annihilation in the 1800s Chief

Osceola's response to his people, the Seminoles, was

simply "They(the US Army)have guns, but so do we."

Sameo to us -They (VA) have 38 CFR ,38 USC, and M21-1- but so do we.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I was with the SOCPAC SOF aviation element involved. We opened up Sendai to allow distribution of water as well as supplying aerial refueling for the helos and various asset movements. Our crews and our STS guys with boots on the ground were checked with a geiger counter, but I believe everyone was cleared. I wish you all the best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Content Curator/HadIt.com Elder

I read online that the radiation recently hit the West coast http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2014/11/14/fukushima-radiation-california-coast/19012777/

I trust the Japanese to build great electronics, but not great nuclear reactors...

"If it's stupid but works, then it isn't stupid."
- From Murphy's Laws of Combat

Disclaimer: I am not a legal expert, so use at own risk and/or consult a qualified professional representative. Please refer to existing VA laws, regulations, and policies for the most up to date information.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

Well, this disaster was on the same scale as Chernobyl, but we aren't in an arms race with Japan, so it was not reported the same way as that disaster was. I would even go so far as to say that we could have more long term, negative effects from this due to the impact on the oceans then we have or will see from Chernobyl. If it matters to anyone, I would like to mention that the people of Japan are extremely appreciative. I know, this may seem small, but it mattered to me. I still have a small, paper fan which has an ink stamp of our flags, says Operation Tomodachi and says thank you hand written on it. Nothing flashy but I keep it with me coins on my mantle. An elderly Japanese man gave me at an airshow at Kadena. He came down to Okinawa just to come give them to us. He was from the region affected and his whole village was destroyed but he was at a hospital far inland when the tsunami hit. His English was broken, so I didn't get much in the way of details and it was always uncomfortable for me to receive praise for doing my job, but it was very touching and heartfelt. I remember that many elderly in Japan were volunteering for clean up at the reactor because, they said, they were nearing the ends of their lives and they would rather be exposed at their age than let someone younger shorten their lives. This moved me as well, based off the fact that I could NEVER see this type of self-sacrifice here in the USA. Very humbling experience for me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

I'm a surviving spouse of a Navy vet who was exposed to atmospheric ionizing radiation in his active duty years. My husband developed a "presumed" cancer long after his exposure. He kept excellent records; he applied for the IRR (Ionizing Radiation Registry http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/radiation/benefits/registry-exam.asp)to verify his military radiation exposure. When he died, I finally received adjudication that his death was 100% service connected. That brought several benefits including an award from Dept of Justice, VA DIC, DEA and CHAMPVA. Sad why I get them, grateful for the VA honoring the service.

My point is, there is a precedent for service connected disability (a long list of presumptive conditions) for atmospheric radiation exposure http://www.publichealth.va.gov/exposures/radiation/diseases.asp. The VA may not yet have those rules clear for Operation Tomodachi, but if you were there, save all records, get medical documentation now and in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Lebro earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • spazbototto earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Paul Gretza earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Troy Spurlock went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • KMac1181 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Our picks

    • These decisions have made a big impact on how VA disability claims are handled, giving veterans more chances to get benefits and clearing up important issues.

      Service Connection

      Frost v. Shulkin (2017)
      This case established that for secondary service connection claims, the primary service-connected disability does not need to be service-connected or diagnosed at the time the secondary condition is incurred 1. This allows veterans to potentially receive secondary service connection for conditions that developed before their primary condition was officially service-connected. 

      Saunders v. Wilkie (2018)
      The Federal Circuit ruled that pain alone, without an accompanying diagnosed condition, can constitute a disability for VA compensation purposes if it results in functional impairment 1. This overturned previous precedent that required an underlying pathology for pain to be considered a disability.

      Effective Dates

      Martinez v. McDonough (2023)
      This case dealt with the denial of an earlier effective date for a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) 2. It addressed issues around the validity of appeal withdrawals and the consideration of cognitive impairment in such decisions.

      Rating Issues

      Continue Reading on HadIt.com
      • 0 replies
    • I met with a VSO today at my VA Hospital who was very knowledgeable and very helpful.  We decided I should submit a few new claims which we did.  He told me that he didn't need copies of my military records that showed my sick call notations related to any of the claims.  He said that the VA now has entire military medical record on file and would find the record(s) in their own file.  It seemed odd to me as my service dates back to  1981 and spans 34 years through my retirement in 2015.  It sure seemed to make more sense for me to give him copies of my military medical record pages that document the injuries as I'd already had them with me.  He didn't want my copies.  Anyone have any information on this.  Much thanks in advance.  
      • 4 replies
    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use