Rebutting Va's "presumption Of Regularity"...

[broncovet]

In other words, "Who's is telling the truth, the VA who says they dont have the document, or the Veteran who says he mailed it in"?

The VA is given a free ride here. The courts ALWAYS favor VA...and the Veteran is assumed to be a liar. (What ever happened to the "benefit of the doubt"? 38 USC 5107)

If you are in a dispute with VA, I humbly suggest reading ASK nod's analysis of the presumption of regularity, and rebutting it.

https://asknod.wordpress.com/category/presumption-of-regularity-2/

[ArNG11]

Yuppers the costs add up, however, the return on the small price ahead of time far outweighs the initial costs. The return is the valuable prize. Catching them in a lie or backing them into their own traps is priceless.

Create the paper trail it is hard to refute when its there in black & white, or black, white, and green.

[lotzaspotz]

Certified mail is hack proof. Ebenefits? Not so sure...

Edited January 24, 2015 by lotzaspotz

[ArNG11]

Ebennies is as good as and as reliable as, well I don't even know what. Hard paper and signatures is the way to go. I have all of mine. They're not in a organized folder yet but I have them all in sequential order along with the paperwork submitted with them.

[lotzaspotz]

As reliable as the meteorologist's weather prediction for next week.

[lotzaspotz]

They Can't BS their way out of a certified mail signed receipt. EBennies would only take a few keystrokes and that would be that....

[Chuck75]

I wonder if a screen capture of the E-Bennie pages showing the relevant information (before it gets deleted) would be admissible.