Jump to content

Ask Your VA Claims Questions | Read Current Posts 
Read VA Disability Claims Articles
Search | View All Forums | Donate | Blogs | New Users | Rules 

  • tbirds-va-claims-struggle (1).png

  • 01-2024-stay-online-donate-banner.png

     

  • 0

Nvlsp (National Veterans Legal Services Program)

Rate this question


whip2482

Question

Hello everyone,

I am new to this site, so I appreciate the time I have to talk with some very knowledgeable people.

My first question is:

Has anyone had any encounters with NVLSP? If so, was your claim successful?

I was contacted last week about a settlement they want to help me with and I am a little skeptical since they contacted me and I had never heard of them. The said they received my claim from the DAV and work on behalf of the veteran through the DAV. All services are pro bono and I have no financial responsibility win or lose.

Thanks for any info you can give me.

I look forward to hearing some good news.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
  • Moderator

Yes, I had them represent me. The fact that they contacted you probably means:

Pros:

1. You had a recent denial at the BVA

2. NVLSP identified what they refer as "errors" at the BVA that they can easily win.

3. They will represent you at no cost to you.

You were probably referred to them by the DAV. They can help you, but, again, you get what you pay for, tho its much better than just going with a VSO. They probably found something incorrect, such as an inadequate "reasons and bases" for decision, or something like that. They only want cases they KNOW they can win, but that does not necessarily mean its good for the VEt. They are experts and wrote the VBM.

Cons:

Dont expect them to go to bat for you with anything except the most winnable cases, and, even then, you will probably be pressured to "settle" because that means they collect fees and, well you may not get much. They dont really seem to want to go to court.

Dont expect a large settlement.

If you can afford another attorney, then that is probably best. They talked me into settling for almost nothing and that put a "w" in their column but I have to now go back and get back on the hamster wheel to really get what they should have fought for me, but wont, because there was a higher chance they would lose. They are intent at keeping their "w" ratio very high, even at the expense of Veterans.

The good news is that, if your claim is accepted by NVLSP, you have about a 90 percent chance of a win. (But, you would likely get a lot more from a more aggressive law firm, as NVLSP is not that aggressive..they only want "sure" wins, and they will only fight for that one thing..not the rest of it.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0
  • Moderator

I can not intelligently answer a "time frame" without knowing more. If you recently signed up with NVLSP and you had a BVA (recent) denial, my experience has been:

The NVLSP will file with the CAVC in your behalf..some sort of appeal, but only AFTER they have agreed to your case and you have signed and returned POA.

After this happens, and your case reaches CAVC you will be assigned a "docket number". The CAVC "really does" go by docket number and does not make up stuff like "some claims are more complex and take more time", like the VARO does. So, your claim will be done in docket number order with the exception of circumstances where the CAVC grants a need based "advance on the docket".

If you have no advance on the docket, and you have a docket number, then you wait.

In probably 6-12 months (you can check on the CAVC site to see what docket number cases they are on, then do the math), you may get some movement.

CAVC cases are "single judge", "panel" or "en banc"...If yours is an "en banc" then there is some legal precedent the CAVC thinks warrants every judge to hear and decide..kind of like a jury. The more judges...the longer it takes.

Ok, so, often the government will "settle" and offer you a settlement. Expect to be pressured into accepting the settlement by you NVLSP lawyer..it means he gets paid, but you may/may not. If its a remand, (often) then you may get 0, as your claim could still be denied by BVA./RO after remand.

Now, its back to BVA, and after the BVA decides it again (after instructions from CAVC), its back to the RO. The RO will send you an "implementing decision", and, if everything goes well, then you get your retro. Time frame for all this: Possibly less than a year, but not likely. More likely, 1-3 years, reminding you the VA delays your case at every stage of the game.

All this said, listen to your NVLSP lawyer, he knows way more about your case than you do, but remember, he is guessing also.

If you lose a "single judge" decision, the NVLSP can request a panel decision or even EN Banc (rare).

If CAVC thinks your case is straight forward, then you can likely expect a single judge decision (likely) that wont be "precedential". This means you are probably not "plowing new ground", and the mere fact NVLSP is representing you, this probably means your are not doing anything different than established case law. They dont like to take chances "plowing new ground"...legally. They just want to generate attorney fees and then keep their "w" very high. Its like the NFL. If there is 30 seconds left, and they are ahead 3 points, dont expect them to pass. They kneel on the ball every single time.

Edited by broncovet
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 0

NVLSP refers court work to accredited VA attorneys who work the case at the Veterans Court. Some of the attorneys are top notch, others are brand new. Some have years of experience, some have minutes of training.

NVLSP will give them a summary of your appeal, and in my experience, they are pretty good. However I have seen a couple pro bono attorneys lose cases that I think should have been won because they were too scared to vary from the script.

NO ATTORNEY that works at the Veterans Court should charge you. If we substantially prevail (which 76% of the time means a remand, and less than 10% of the time means an outright win), we are paid by the VA from the Equal Access to Justice Fund.

My advice? Talk to at least 3 different Veterans Court attorneys before you consider hiring one. There are a LOT of good - and free - options.

Nothing wrong with NVLSP...just saying that they aren't actually your attorney, they just typically farm it out to attorneys in their network.

You have choices. Here's some links from the Veterans Law Blog.....

8 Things Veterans Should Know about the Veterans Court.

Choosing the Right VA Disability Attorney Means Knowing What Questions to Ask.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Tell a friend

    Love HadIt.com’s VA Disability Community Vets helping Vets since 1997? Tell a friend!
  • Recent Achievements

    • Ronald beecher went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      First Post
    • Tim Walsh earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • BirddogM578 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Our picks

    • Caluza Triangle defines what is necessary for service connection
      Caluza Triangle – Caluza vs Brown defined what is necessary for service connection. See COVA– CALUZA V. BROWN–TOTAL RECALL

      This has to be MEDICALLY Documented in your records:

      Current Diagnosis.   (No diagnosis, no Service Connection.)

      In-Service Event or Aggravation.
      Nexus (link- cause and effect- connection) or Doctor’s Statement close to: “The Veteran’s (current diagnosis) is at least as likely due to x Event in military service”
      • 0 replies
    • Do the sct codes help or hurt my disability rating 
    • VA has gotten away with (mis) interpreting their  ambigious, , vague regulations, then enforcing them willy nilly never in Veterans favor.  

      They justify all this to congress by calling themselves a "pro claimant Veteran friendly organization" who grants the benefit of the doubt to Veterans.  

      This is not true, 

      Proof:  

          About 80-90 percent of Veterans are initially denied by VA, pushing us into a massive backlog of appeals, or worse, sending impoverished Veterans "to the homeless streets" because  when they cant work, they can not keep their home.  I was one of those Veterans who they denied for a bogus reason:  "Its been too long since military service".  This is bogus because its not one of the criteria for service connection, but simply made up by VA.  And, I was a homeless Vet, albeit a short time,  mostly due to the kindness of strangers and friends. 

          Hadit would not be necessary if, indeed, VA gave Veterans the benefit of the doubt, and processed our claims efficiently and paid us promptly.  The VA is broken. 

          A huge percentage (nearly 100 percent) of Veterans who do get 100 percent, do so only after lengthy appeals.  I have answered questions for thousands of Veterans, and can only name ONE person who got their benefits correct on the first Regional Office decision.  All of the rest of us pretty much had lengthy frustrating appeals, mostly having to appeal multiple multiple times like I did. 

          I wish I know how VA gets away with lying to congress about how "VA is a claimant friendly system, where the Veteran is given the benefit of the doubt".   Then how come so many Veterans are homeless, and how come 22 Veterans take their life each day?  Va likes to blame the Veterans, not their system.   
    • Welcome to hadit!  

          There are certain rules about community care reimbursement, and I have no idea if you met them or not.  Try reading this:

      https://www.va.gov/resources/getting-emergency-care-at-non-va-facilities/

         However, (and I have no idea of knowing whether or not you would likely succeed) Im unsure of why you seem to be so adamant against getting an increase in disability compensation.  

         When I buy stuff, say at Kroger, or pay bills, I have never had anyone say, "Wait!  Is this money from disability compensation, or did you earn it working at a regular job?"  Not once.  Thus, if you did get an increase, likely you would have no trouble paying this with the increase compensation.  

          However, there are many false rumors out there that suggest if you apply for an increase, the VA will reduce your benefits instead.  

      That rumor is false but I do hear people tell Veterans that a lot.  There are strict rules VA has to reduce you and, NOT ONE of those rules have anything to do with applying for an increase.  

      Yes, the VA can reduce your benefits, but generally only when your condition has "actually improved" under ordinary conditions of life.  

          Unless you contacted the VA within 72 hours of your medical treatment, you may not be eligible for reimbursement, or at least that is how I read the link, I posted above. Here are SOME of the rules the VA must comply with in order to reduce your compensation benefits:

      https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/38/3.344

       
    • Good question.   

          Maybe I can clear it up.  

          The spouse is eligible for DIC if you die of a SC condition OR any condition if you are P and T for 10 years or more.  (my paraphrase).  

      More here:

      Source:

      https://www.va.gov/disability/dependency-indemnity-compensation/

      NOTE:   TO PROVE CAUSE OF DEATH WILL LIKELY REQUIRE AN AUTOPSY.  This means if you die of a SC condtion, your spouse would need to do an autopsy to prove cause of death to be from a SC condtiond.    If you were P and T for 10 full years, then the cause of death may not matter so much. 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Guidelines and Terms of Use